The guidelines are very clear in stating that genres should not be repeated as keywords. Yet, this problem continues to happen. Recently, I have audited and corrected 96 "thrilller" (Yes, three l's) keywords and 80 "mistery" (yes, with an "i" instead of a "y) keywords as well as many, many other key

I previously raised most of these keywords in an earlier "question" post. The consensus appears to be that these keywords should be banned. Accordingly, I propose that the following keywords should be deleted from the IMDb system and permabanned: Useless/Spam Keywords - Please Delete and Ban availab

Dear IMDb staff: Here are a few more random keywords that should be deleted and blocked from the system. Subjective Keywords to Delete and Block freaky (7 titles) drive-in-classic (190 titles) Genre Keywords to Delete and Block bestdocumentary (1 title) documentary-feature-film (9 titles) feature-do

It would seem that these keywords are not valid, since they replicate information that can be easily searched via the database. As a secondary reason, the keywords do not in any way involve the plots of the titles. (I realize that not all keywords involve plots, so this factor is not dispositive.) A

Dear IMDb staff: your help is needed to permanently ban several racist keywords that are racist against Asian people. These keywords are mostly the work of a single troll. When the keywords are deleted, the troll typically adds them right back. almond-eyes almond-shaped-eyes asiatic chinaman chinawo

According to the keywords guide (https://help.imdb.com/article/contribution/titles/keywords/GXQ22G5Y72TH8MJ5?ref_=helpms_helpart_inline#), a keyword should never be plural. Therefore, can a staffer merge the existing occurrences of the keyword mermaids (https://www.imdb.com/search/title/?keywords=me

neil patrick harris character tony shalhoub character Not how character keywords are intended to be used. Perhaps they could be deleted when possible.

Dear IMDb staff: Here are some more keywords that should be deleted and blocked from the system. All of these appear on Adult titles, and they are all poorly formatted keywords that should be deleted and blocked. I suspect all these keywords were generated by the same contributor. Poorly Formatted A

The following keywords should be deleted and blocked as poorly formatted: a (6 titles) o (3 titles) s (5 titles) x (3 titles) y (2 titles)

When a particular sex act or other intimate detail is an important plot point, as in the Netflix show Sex Education, it seems to me it should be possible to describe it with a keyword. So why are some such keywords being rejected as not following guidelines? There is nothing about this in the keywor

Hello IMDb staff, These proposed keyword edits have been posted in other threads, but I am consolidating them here to make sure they are not overlooked. All mergers and auto-conversions should occur in the direction of the arrows. First, these keywords need to be re-merged and set up for auto-conver

Since these two IMDb keywords are vague-sounding - as a film's box office cannot always be conclusively proved - I propose that they both be deleted.

By all logical means neo-noir is a subgenre, however respective keyword is indexed as "plot-detail".

I just discovered another trove of bad keywords, all of which were mass-added to female wresting titles, just like a previous batch of keywords like I raised in a previous post. These keywords are all bad, and for a variety of different reasons, including plural keywords, useless keywords, keywords

Dear IMDb staff: Here are a few more random keywords that should be deleted and blocked from the system. Subjective Keywords to Delete and Block great (4 titles) heart-warming (6 titles) heartwarming (30 titles) Genre Keywords to Delete and Block musica (13 titles) children's (1 title) Vague and Gen