According to the keywords guide (https://help.imdb.com/article/contribution/titles/keywords/GXQ22G5Y72TH8MJ5?ref_=helpms_helpart_inline#), a keyword should never be plural. Therefore, can a staffer merge the existing occurrences of the keyword mermaids (https://www.imdb.com/search/title/?keywords=me

It would seem that these keywords are not valid, since they replicate information that can be easily searched via the database. As a secondary reason, the keywords do not in any way involve the plots of the titles. (I realize that not all keywords involve plots, so this factor is not dispositive.

Dear IMDb staff: your help is needed to permanently ban several racist keywords that are racist against Asian people. These keywords are mostly the work of a single troll. When the keywords are deleted, the troll typically adds them right back.  almond-eyes almond-shaped-eyes as

Since these two IMDb keywords are vague-sounding - as a film's box office cannot always be conclusively proved - I propose that they both be deleted.

Hello IMDb staff, These proposed keyword edits have been posted in other threads, but I am consolidating them here to make sure they are not overlooked. All mergers and auto-conversions should occur in the direction of the arrows. First, these keywords need to be re-merged and set up for au

Dear IMDb staff: Here are a few more random keywords that should be deleted and blocked from the system. Subjective Keywords to Delete and Block great (4 titles) heart-warming (6 titles) heartwarming (30 titles) Genre Keywords to Delete and Block musica (13 titles

When a particular sex act or other intimate detail is an important plot point, as in the Netflix show Sex Education, it seems to me it should be possible to describe it with a keyword. So why are some such keywords being rejected as not following guidelines? There is nothing about this in the keywo

Reference number 220520-014837-630000. I submitted some keywords but I noticed that the submission was declined and was wondering what was up. The movie is publicly available for viewing on Tubi, so it seems like it should be verifiable, if that's the issue.

I just discovered another trove of bad keywords, all of which were mass-added to female wresting titles, just like a previous batch of keywords like I raised in a previous post. These keywords are all bad, and for a variety of different reasons, including plural keywords, useless keywords, keywor

2004 archived keyword page for Giant from the Unknown (1958) Today's archived keyword page for Giant from the Unknown (1958) Giant from the Unknown (1958) keywords Giant from the Unknown (1958) had more keywords in 2004 than it does now. Can any keywords that were deleted from this title be

Dear IMDb staff: About a week ago, I deleted the following keywords from The Shining (1980) under contribution #221105-183753-517000: cannibalism cult cult classic cult director home home sweet home The keywords are already back on the title, presumably re-added by the same contributor

The following keywords, listed in several categories, should be banned. Subjective Sexualization Keywords The following keywords all involve the subjective sexualization of women or girls. Most of them appear to have been created by the same user. They have no place on IMDb and should all be perm

Someone continues to delete keywords soon after IMDb accepts them on a variety of obscure titles. It's unclear how this person is even finding the keywords, much less why he's deleting them.https://contribute.imdb.com/contribution/210107-092506-677000https://contribute.imdb.com/contribution/210109-1