Data Issues & Policy Discussions

Dear Sir or Madam, I am writing to suggest an idea of limiting rating and reviewing of motion picture on your app. I know that you support the freedom of speech and want to have many ratings and reviews on your app but there are tons of movies and shows that are just underrated or rarely overrated.

Is there any way to stop first weekend reviews? It hurts movie theaters significantly when a movie like Lightyear is being review bombed because of a same-sex kiss. That's just one example. I've had multiple patrons tell me they didn't want to watch a movie because of reviews, only to love that same

I was thinking of having political views as a section but that’s too abstract. But I don’t see the point of having publicity listings, video and screen clips, and star sign. It seems like too much info compared to a religion section.

Plot Keywords often contain spoilers. Example: transsexual showing up on "The Crying Game" effectively hints at the entire point of the movie. There are plenty of other examples It seems like it would be best if spoilers were not on the main page?

Perhaps there could be a section in the cast list that contains spoilers? While recently finishing the first part of Stranger Things 4, I had an extremely huge and important plot point ruined for me because the cast list carelessly lists every actor's character names. Information which is typically

On the Goofs, Trivia, and Quotes pages, in addition to "Is this interesting?" and "Share this", I think there should be an option for "Flag as spoiler", so that the information in question doesn't appear on the movie main page and is marked as spoiler on its appropriate page. A similar feature in th

Could IMDB please create a category for Virtual Reality projects (instead of Video Game)

Now to delete or correct credit on tv shows is so hard Because sometimes there is 100-200 episodes and you must go one by one and correct/delete it To add credit to all episodes there is function, but to correct not, only one by one I think to correct is always more important then add Because you ca

This is an example of a recurrent problem that IMDb is well aware of, but has been unable to solve: the presence in the Attributes listing (that users must consult before they enter a new one) has been constructed by successive additions, and never revised under a criteria (for instance, always use

when submitters describe where a goof is located by saying "if one was to look closely", it may not be sufficient enough so may I suggest submitters rephrase it to " the goof can be found approximately one hour, thirty-two minutes, and ten seconds", or rephrase it to "if one were to pause the film a