Taylor's profile
Employee

Employee

 • 

1.7K Messages

 • 

33.3K Points

Tue, May 18, 2021 6:23 PM

INTRODUCING: Updated IMDb.com Title page experience

INTRODUCING: Updated IMDb.com Title page experience

We are excited to announce the launch of IMDb’s newly refreshed movie and TV show pages! The renewed page is meant to make your IMDb experience easy and enjoyable, and its design represents the diverse interests of global entertainment fans. The refresh reflects IMDb customer feedback and research designed to enhance entertainment content discovery and navigation.

Please note, we are gradually launching the new design to a selection of IMDb customers. If you do not yet see the design, we expect to make it broadly available in the weeks ahead. Thank you for using IMDb!

For more information, check out this Help article.

Responses

4.6K Messages

 • 

137.8K Points

1 m ago

@Taylor, Employee

Taylor, Employee
Wed, Dec 2, 2020
Title pages — new version available for sneak peek
https://community-imdb.sprinklr.com/conversations/imdbcom/title-pages-new-version-available-for-sneak-peek/5fc7eae5ce4ce1357af24f6d

3.3K views  |  217 comments  |  -31 downvotes   | 116 followers

[ Closed ]

Add a link on the above to this new message ? ?

This looks better than the previous update 😊


Hotel Transylvania: Transformania (2021)
Releases July 23, 2021
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt9848626/

 
Where is ...
Reference View| Change View  ? ?
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt9848626/reference

https://www.imdb.com/preferences/general

Contributors
[x]  Show reference view with full cast and crew (advanced view)

Reference View does not have ...

Kathryn Hahn ... Ericka (voice)   character link  ? ?

- - -
  
Add "Character" to Search bar top of page ? ?
with ..

"All"
"Titles"
"TV Episodes"
"Celebs"
"Companies"
"Keywords
"Advanced Search"
- - -

  

IMDb Used to have helpful Character names
to see all that played Superman, Batman, James Bond
Can you bring that back ? ?

  
Wayback Machine
  
James Bond (Character)

nic_b, Employee
Tue, Nov 14, 2017
Today we are modifying the display of Characters across IMDb.
After in-depth discussion and examination, 
we have decided to simplify the display of Characters on IMDb
https://community-imdb.sprinklr.com/conversations/data-issues-policy-discussions/updates-to-characters/5f4a7b258815453dbacbd7f4

.

(edited)

1 Message

 • 

60 Points

Absolutely hate the new design.  Yes,  it takes up more space and is harder to find information.  I'd rather scan (by actually reading) what I'm trying to find and get taken to  pictures when I click on something - smaller pictures. Looks like you shrunk everything I come to site to find and filled pages with too much what I hesitate to call "style" over substance.  Why did you do this?  Is there any way users can switch back to old design?  Big fail.

Geodacius

36 Messages

 • 

648 Points

Epic Fail.

3 Messages

 • 

88 Points

Complete and utterly horrible. Why do they do this to us?

1 Message

 • 

74 Points

I agree. The 'new improved' version sucks. 

1 Message

 • 

60 Points

Hate the new version. I have to scroll three pages to find a release date. 

2 Messages

 • 

108 Points

Despise the new format of IMDB. I removed my cookies in Firefox (old version 48.0.2) and got back the old beloved version of IMDB. I keep getting the old version, then the new version, but when I could no longer get the old version, removing cookies, the IMDB cookies, seemed to restore the older BELOVED version finally!

I will now start checking out Tmdb, since it has a friendlier format, if I find that the NEWER HATED version of IMDB returns to my Macbook Pro on old v. Firefox.

Too bad IMDB thinks destroying their user base is a good thing.

I HATE the new version of IMDB. It is despicable. Who is the idiot that thought it was better?

I - AM - NOT - ALONE!

3 Messages

 • 

188 Points

Thanks for the tip about TMDB. I had never heard of that site but will certainly give it a look!

6 Messages

 • 

132 Points

Plus 1 for the tip about TMDB. Would never have heard of it if I hadn't been sufficiently motivated bythe new IMDB layout to see how I could register my dislike.

8 Messages

 • 

140 Points

Glad I saw the mention of TMDB. Hadn't heard of it before. Sad that something as great as IMDB continues to change itself in ways that I want to find another place to be my first look for info.

1 Message

 • 

60 Points

@ACT_1 Its disgusting and ugly

1 Message

 • 

78 Points

@ACT_1  I must whole-heartedly concur.  I HATE this new design.  Is there a way for us to view the page as it USED to be? 

11 Messages

 • 

184 Points

@ACT_1 I just now saw this and clicked on some of the links. This makes the statement that @Col_Needham said this tested well among users as design was being rolled out even more ridiculous. Same complaints, same lack of interest by IMDB to listen.

4 Messages

 • 

96 Points

1 m ago

Is this a new version of imdb.com?  I don't like it if it is. The only thing different that I see is that the information for the different sections takes up more screen space. It was better when it was shown more condensed with more info showing on the page. What's up with this? 

Note: This comment was created from a merged conversation originally titled imdb.com website

1 Message

 • 

62 Points

I agree. It's a complete mess.

It's not pleasing to the eye, you have to scroll further to see the cast, and sooo much more. Whoever wants to see videos and pics before checking out the cast - especially, as you say, it takes up half the screen.

1 Message

 • 

60 Points

agree - hate it

3 Messages

 • 

120 Points

It's appallingly bad, who greenlights these changes? Clearly someone who does not use regularly.

14 Messages

 • 

440 Points

I agree as well. I'm seeing two different layouts depending on which browser I use but both have the information sorted in mostly the least useful order possible and one version uses what appears to be roughly twice the space to do so. Was there an actual poll asking users about their preferences? Every time I've been presented with a beta version of the new layout I submitted feedback but that's not quite the same thing as taking an actual user poll.

Also, to add to what DannX68 mentions, what is the point of massive video and photo sections when there is a link to both videos and photos on the bottom/side (depending on the version) of the trailer?

This change is very much in line with the "enhancements" Amazon (IMDb parent company) makes on their main site that make using it a less and less enjoyable experience each time. It's fortunate that Google now shows most of the important information on the side of the search result as I'd rather not visit IMDb if this is what I'm going to have to deal with going forward.

6 Messages

 • 

134 Points

@jamerkk I went looking for alternatives, seems that TMDb is the one most used/recommended. Took a look and it looks a bit more bare as far as info goes, but at least looks like an actual WEBSITE. I imagine with more users it could replace this.

Geodacius

36 Messages

 • 

648 Points

Thank you for this, I will be checking them out.  I opt out of this mobile oriented market nonsense.

3 Messages

 • 

88 Points

I hate this. They should have at least offered us the choice of which format we would prefer. This is garbage.

3 Messages

 • 

102 Points

@Redrusty66 Thank you for providing an alternative. This version of IMDb is not accessible for me.

2 Messages

 • 

108 Points

@Redrusty66 Thank you for telling us about Tmdb, I mentioned it in one of my comments because of you, plus I checked it out some.

@ACT_1 Thank you for mentioning and giving links to Wayback Machine.

It may be possible to use Wayback Machine to access the older and BELOVED version of IMDB. Just choose an older date/year on one of the calendars, then search in old IMDB (from Wayback Machine, see link below).

Apparently IMDB is bound and determined to eventually change to the newer and DESPISED IMDB version, so Wayback Machine may be a work-around.

Highlight COMPLETE link below and open in new window, opens IMDB in Wayback Machine:

http://web.archive.org/web/20190101000000*/http://www.imdb.com/

(edited)

4.6K Messages

 • 

137.8K Points

2 Messages

 • 

70 Points

1 m ago

What happened to the parental guide in the new website format?  I cannot find it anywhere.  Thanks.

Note: This comment was created from a merged conversation originally titled parental guide

Employee

 • 

4.3K Messages

 • 

142.6K Points

@rustyi  The Parents Guide is in the same place as before -- at the bottom of the "Storyline" section.  Perhaps you checked a title which does not have such a guide?  You can find one on https://www.imdb.com/title/tt9620292/ 

Note that you can always easily access all (available) subpages from the "All Topics" menu near the top right of the new title pages.  See the red highlighting below:

Hope this helps. 

11 Messages

 • 

264 Points

Hate, hate, hate this new format! IMDb needs a new link across the top, Choose Format, letting members keep the style they like. The new style wastes space and seems designed for the less-literate. The old style takes up less server space. What does Amazon have against saving money? Please use your influence as site founder to pass this near-unanimous hatred of the new style to Amazon

(edited)

1 Message

 • 

60 Points

1 m ago

Really enjoy the new look. So much infact, that I would love for it to stop nagging about "Welcome to the new version of this page."

Like, I know, stop telling me ;-)

So a X or something to close that banner would be nice.

2 Messages

 • 

92 Points

Jeaz,

I respect your opinion to differ from mine.   But I disagree,   the new look, layout , and design{S} are/is  an assault visually and performatively to users of the site.  I also noticed this is your only posting.  (This is my second posting, under this name ) I was a daily user till comments went away   and still a daily viewer.  But  who would spend that much time to make a profile on a new site that (that annoyingly imbd  makes you visit to complain, but does not actually matter ,or really monitor)  You seem like a bot , or a plant  comment. 

schitlipz

22 Messages

 • 

508 Points

I'd give you a thumbs up, but this place doesn't make that thumb thing visible all the time.  And yeah, I had to  "join" this comments section to vent... solely about the new design.

That's how terrible the new design is:  People who would normally not sign in to anything new at all, simply must do so if only to tell them they made a mistake.

I got a feeling they won't listen.  If they make it this difficult to give them feedback, then they don't want any.  Maybe it's time to move along.  A previous poster mentioned TMDB.  Looks interesting.  Not like the old IMDb, but more charming than the new IMDb.

20 Messages

 • 

360 Points

@schitlipz  ok, that's a sign... i somehow landed on there today... and thought wtf is this... i have to check it out. AND i need to know who owns it. if it's amazon i'm off..

2 Messages

 • 

72 Points

1 m ago

How can you turn off dark mode? It's VERY hard to read on my monitors in dark mode. There should be an option to keep the new layout but switch it back to light mode!

4.6K Messages

 • 

137.8K Points

@lburtts
Joined Wed, May 19, 2021 
- - -

See my message above about

Reference View| Change View

Try that ? ?

.

2 Messages

 • 

72 Points

Ahh, you are talking about checking this box --

-"
This does indeed change it temporary to light mode with the 'Advanced View' style, which I don't care for - and not the new view as I specified in my message.

2 Messages

 • 

96 Points

Thanks for the tip though, it's still better than the new title page.

4 Messages

 • 

100 Points

@ACT_1 @lburtts  Ahhh this "advanced view" is soooo much better, even though this wasn't what you were looking for, thanks for the tip!!

11 Messages

 • 

194 Points

1 m ago

I ABHOR the new page - it's clunky, super slow to load, and adds extra steps and/or clicks to every interaction I did with the old layout.  Please provide a way for users to use the old layout! 

1 Message

 • 

64 Points

Agree. It's not bad on a portrait screen but it's much much much worse than the old layout on anything wider than a phone. Please add a way to opt out. 

4.6K Messages

 • 

137.8K Points

1 m ago

Old samples to look at (͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Look up others ? ?

Vote for the one you like best ? ?

Can not make an official IMDb Poll of this here ;-(

Pulp Fiction (1994)
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0110912/

reference view with full cast and crew (advanced view)

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0110912/reference

  
Wayback Machine IMDb

http://web.archive.org/web/*/https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0110912/

http://web.archive.org/web/*/https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0110912/reference

Message Boards
http://web.archive.org/web/*/https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0110912/board/

- - -

Jun 7 2021
OLD page ? ?
http://web.archive.org/web/20210607143712/https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0110912/

 

Jan 1 2020
http://web.archive.org/web/20200101123521/https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0110912/

Jul 9 2020
http://web.archive.org/web/20200709054121/https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0110912/reference

  
Jan 2 2019
http://web.archive.org/web/20190102015157/https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0110912/

Apr 11 2019
http://web.archive.org/web/20190411070222/https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0110912/reference

  
Jan 4 2018
http://web.archive.org/web/20180104063522/https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0110912/

  

Jan 1 2017
http://web.archive.org/web/20170101195809/https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0110912/

Mar 22 2017
http://web.archive.org/web/20170322174605/https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0110912/reference

  
Jan 3 2016
http://web.archive.org/web/20160103080634/http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0110912/

  
Jan 2 2015
http://web.archive.org/web/20150102231133/https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0110912/

Jul 20 2015
http://web.archive.org/web/20150720001402/https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0110912/reference

  

Jan 1 2014
http://web.archive.org/web/20140101062032/https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0110912/

Apr 24 2014
http://web.archive.org/web/20140424072617/https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0110912/reference

  
Oct 2 2003
http://web.archive.org/web/20031002143431/https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0110912/

  

Message Board
http://web.archive.org/web/20040628063531/https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0110912/board/threads/

http://web.archive.org/web/20031105062846/http://www.imdb.com:80/title/tt0110912/board/nest/3100381?d=3340163

.

(edited)

6 Messages

 • 

132 Points

Easily the older version

1 Message

 • 

66 Points

@ACT_1 the version 2016-2020 was probably the best. not perfect, but pretty good. ~(20 years in UX design)

2 Messages

 • 

80 Points

1 m ago

Why am I getting some kind of strange new layout on many pages. I think it is horrible. How do I get the original layout to pages back. Examples of new       https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0364845/    https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119116/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0 

Note: This comment was created from a merged conversation originally titled New Layout

3 Messages

 • 

70 Points

This layout is indeed terrible. The new cast information is just horrible to browse and for example the trivia pages seem unfinished. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119116/trivia/?ref_=tt_ql_trv

Employee

 • 

4.3K Messages

 • 

142.6K Points

@Koza Thanks for the feedback. The trivia page design has not changed for 10+ years. If you are seeing something different, please see https://help.imdb.com/article/imdb/general-information/why-is-imdb-displaying-differently-on-my-browser/GF2ZAR69V859XLHF 

3 Messages

 • 

70 Points

This was my second choice for the problem but didn't get around to checking it out yet. But yes, problem solved on that part, thank you.

15 Messages

 • 

270 Points

Col_Needham - I know your comment is from 19 days ago, but I've been reading these comments for DAYS now. All of us commenting HATE the new design. I know, I know, IMDB has paid for the changes and they won't want to go back. But we're all here to tell you the new design is TERRIBLE. You're being their mouthpiece, whether you are an IMDB employee or not, but don't think you're going to change any minds. LOL  We HATE the new design. We've told you all the details of why we hate it.

4.6K Messages

 • 

137.8K Points

@ApplePie

Joined on May 31, 2021
Col_Needham ...  whether you are an IMDB employee or not...
- - -

IMDb staff member Col Needham
Founder and CEO of IMDb.

https://www.imdb.com/name/nm1000000/

  
Registered Wed Oct 17 1990
https://www.imdb.com/user/ur1000000/

To contact me or to report a problem with the site, please use our help desk at

http://www.imdb.com/contact

Joined Tue, Dec 11, 2012
https://community-imdb.sprinklr.com/users/5f495568917fbb5af045ca7b

.

(edited)

15 Messages

 • 

270 Points

All right, I did NOT mean to insult you. I had no idea you were the Founder and CEO of IMDB. All it says is IMDB staff member. After all, you don't seem to care whether we are upset about the changes that were made so that made you *seem* to be 'just' an employee. I'm sorry!! 

schitlipz

22 Messages

 • 

508 Points

Now that's funny.

:D

7.9K Messages

 • 

181.3K Points

Well, he founded IMDb but then eight to ten years afterward, he sold it to Amazon.com, Inc., and managed to secure a private contract that allows/requires him to remain the chief executive officer of IMDb. I don't remember whether or not IMDb ever had a board of directors, but for the longest time, the identities of folks who serve on it, if it exists, have not been publicly disclosed. I'd imagine that Amazon as a company has significant sayso over some of IMDb's and BoxOfficeMojo's affairs, but I figure it mostly only provides electronic data storage support and liability support, maybe "human resources" support, like engineering support and actuarial support. I lean toward doubting that there is anybody working for IMDb whose performance, work, role or office is not valued in some way by the CEO of IMDb. I don't know whether or not the CEO can create or abolish offices at will, as would be the case in a sole proprietorship.

4.6K Messages

 • 

137.8K Points

IMDb does not consider this a reliable source for information

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IMDb

Anyone can add data there... 😜

.

20 Messages

 • 

360 Points

@jeorj_euler  & @ACT_1  what do you think, how much of the actual information ( not reviews.. information like actors, plot summaries, episode plots..) are contributed by users? 50/50? 10/90? maybe i am often landing in niches but i find myself missing A LOT of information. ( for example https://www.imdb.com/title/tt10316624/fullcredits/?ref_=tt_cl_sm cast and crew?)
[i find it unfair that important people are not credited and write it down as i'm watching - parallel to working.. - & .. i'm asking myself if it's worth contributing/doing that at all - putting any weight on that. I am tending to think they probably have 'their' people anyway and if they don't, they probably don't care anymore given the changes in all its landscape...

4.6K Messages

 • 

137.8K Points

   

I asked years ago if the Studios, Producers, Directors etc.
could add all the correct cast & crew names here
IMDb could then flag that title as complete
  
Not depend on some Users watching TV or DVDs
or taking notes in a movie theater  etc.

.

7.9K Messages

 • 

181.3K Points

Most of the information on IMDb is contributed by film audiences, I believe. Some of it certainly contributed by filmmakers who obviously are going to be focused mostly on their own work and their own circle of colleagues. From what I've observed over the years, the people who are credited in one thing or another are really only focused on the IMDb pages that have anything to do with them or their bodies of work and don't care at all about anything else on the site.

15 Messages

 • 

248 Points

The major studios and some production companies seem to update their content (first entries, local release date etc.), but any contributor can change nearly anything if it's provable. The final decision lies of course on the IMDb staff that approves those contributions. I often needed to add titles that are not entered by the filmmakers or distributors simply because they don't know about it or how to enter sth. or don't care because they think they don't need to because they're not from the US. But IMDb has been grown into an international source of information about movies and series.

I often add or correct data or names. Often the names and characters are written down from the end credits, but sometimes, when you watch a movie you recognize some irregularities with the spelling (a name appears in a scene on screen but has been spelled differently in the end credits). That's where the user contributions come in. Also there are often character names missing, simply because the officials who entered the actors' names didn't really know them yet at the date of entry. And not only with the user contributions often come misspellings or wrong entries, just because the contributors didn't research them for correctness.

But I think, and that's what IMDb is all about, there can never be a completion flag of an entry, simply because someone is adding or correcting something that someone else had missed. And if that correction or addition ist indeed accurate, this would be the best case scenario.

So when you see a movie with less entries than f.e. The Avengers, it could be that there is not more to add just because there was less staff involved, but it could mean too that the movie was entered by an inofficial entity like me or any other contributor that isn't affiliated with the filmmakers.

4.6K Messages

 • 

137.8K Points

Wobblesocks
Joined Thu, Jun 17, 2021 
https://community-imdb.sprinklr.com/users/Wobblesocks

Thu, Jun 17, 2021 
Hello,
Could someone please tell me who has been responsible 
for the accuracy of the content listed on the IMDB pages?
There are numerous typos, mis-spellings, bad grammar, anachronistic references,
and other amateurish text and information spread across many pages.
Who edits this information to make it correct,
or is the standard going to continue to be at a grade school level?
https://community-imdb.sprinklr.com/conversations/data-issues-policy-discussions/editing/60cb860896d975337b037731

- - -
  
Michelle, Employee
Hello Will -
In short, the information in IMDb comes from various sources 
and our data goes through consistency checks 
to ensure it's as accurate and reliable as possible.
For more information I encourage you to review the following Help Article.
  
Where does the information on IMDb come from?
https://help.imdb.com/article/imdb/general-information/where-does-the-information-on-imdb-come-from/GGD7NGF5X3ECFKNN

In the meantime, can you clarify where specifically on the site you are seeing these grammatical errors (ie. Plots, User Reviews, Trivia, etc.)?

.

7.9K Messages

 • 

181.3K Points

By "filmmakers", I'm referring not only to filmmakers (like executive producers, scene directors, cinematographers and post-production) but also to studio representatives, publicists and casts, just about anybody involved in a production.

20 Messages

 • 

360 Points

[ @ACT_1  jesus christ ... I am amazed. what profession are you in? you constantly have examples and past threads at hand ... ]

20 Messages

 • 

360 Points

@samofnine so how would you define/explain the premise of this site? now?
maybe i'm just too naive, idealistic or misunderstood all this time.. i thought the first and foremost objective is to be the most comprehensive archive?
i seriously imagined nerdy, obsessive people (imdb -staff) to research and check content all day ... (and envied them so so much.)

15 Messages

 • 

248 Points

It's still the resource for people who want to know about movies and series, and also a place where everybody can vote and review titles. It just took a step back with the new layout. You need to klick and scroll more and can't copy text like before, and I hope that the plot outlines for different languages are coming back sometime in the near future. Col mentioned something earlier.

When you add a new movie you have to provide proof of its existence so the IMDb staff can check it out and greenlight the entry. If you want something to be deleted because it's obsolete or faulty, you have to provide an explanation. But often they can't verify it unless you can provide a link that proves it. So, unless it's provable on the IMDb end you have no chance to add, change or correct content.

And sometimes I found out that there are more people with the same name that are indeed the same person, because the person who entered the nth name didn't really knew that this person did something before or was mentioned in another capacity. Also the different english spellings of names from another character system like chinese or russian. Often there are many versions of a name, falsly spelled or interchanged - you go crazy looking for them. That's why I am for an original spelling in their language and an alternate name list like the alternate titles of movies.

55 Messages

 • 

2.7K Points

1 m ago

What a horrible experience, this doesn't look like IMDb anymore.

10 Messages

 • 

352 Points

Yes, horrible, looks like an actor/actress fan club thing.

Champion

 • 

4.1K Messages

 • 

108.7K Points

1 m ago

What sequence of choices on the Contact Page do you recommend for reporting bugs or issues? I chose this

IMDb Contributor
- I need help and haven't submitted an update
- Titles
- Other title issues

But I doubt a non-contributor would go down that path. I don't see a clear path down the IMDb Fan fork either.

Here's my feedback, and I'll post this url to the form for the screenshots I'm including.

IMDb URL of the title page: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1221127/

Explanation of the problem: My site preferences specify English as my Title Display Language.
On this page, I get the French title.


When I look at the release info page, French is coded as the "original title", which is fair, since this was staged in France.
But _on_ the release info page, the title displayed at the top is the "worldwide title".


Neither page gives me the "worldwide English title", which is listed among others. Is it ignored because of the attribute "DVD title"? If so, why? And why would the title page differ from any of its subsidiaries?

Also Known As (AKA)

(original title) De la maison des morts
Czech Republic Z mrtvého domu
Europe (English title) (DVD box title) From the House of the Dead
Germany Aus einem Totenhaus
Japan (DVD title) Yanâcheku: Kageki 'Shisha no ie kara' zenkyoku
World-wide (English title) (DVD title) Janácek: From the House of the Dead
World-wide Z mrtvého domu - From the House of the Dead

11 Messages

 • 

194 Points

@bderoes There is also no option to give feedback on the layout, design, features, or anything to do with the new format. I think they must have known that a large percentage of power users of the site were going to hate it. I hope I'm wrong, but they haven't been receptive so far.  

Employee

 • 

4.3K Messages

 • 

142.6K Points

@bderoes  We will flag the CS option issue to the team, thanls. 

The issue you highlight is a very specific issue with the AKA titles which has now been fixed on https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1221127/releaseinfo (your assumption was correct -- the DVD title is not enough to change the title at the top of the page; the old software has bugs in this respect which we are not replicating as we move pages over to the new technology). 

100 Messages

 • 

2K Points

Col what does it to you if you read 90% of the people in here that contribute to your site saying they don't enjoy the new look at all? Just wondering.

4 Messages

 • 

94 Points

It means nothing to them. We're stuck with it whether we want it or not. Our only choices are to get used to it or find a suitable replacement for IMDb.

43 Messages

 • 

1.1K Points

@Col_Needham fire all your UX team, a 7 year old could design better than this.

7.9K Messages

 • 

181.3K Points

Why would he ever fire the UX team? He is clearly more than satisfied with their work.

2 Messages

 • 

70 Points

19 Messages

 • 

314 Points

😅

And let's drink a New Coke while we watch.