@rubyfruit76 

I changed the title and the made edits in the intro, maybe it fits better now. ;D

The rest I'll consider tonight (CET)

@RaviNathan:

I won't replace snubbed with overrated. "Snubbed" sounds much more dramatic.

P.S.: Overrated in the title sounds boring.

@rubyfruit76 

I wonder how a fittin conclusion might look in relation to the snubbed movies.

Please, would you explain your idea about the conclusion further.

Ok, I changed the title. Do you think the impression ist better, or should I change the "snubbed" in the intro as well? :)

RaviNathan: I guess I will use contempt. Just looked into translation site. I think it's good and sound bad enough. ;)

My ratings for these films range from 1/10 to 2/10.

@cinephile 

At first thank you for suggesting, your suggestion is on the list. I allowed myself to shorten your text in some of the ten count of the conclusion, because it grew to long. I hope that doesn't anger you. I would prefer, if you find some shorter descriptions for some of them. I know it is difficult to pack fitting descriptions it into five words. I tried my best.

rubyfruit wrote (some postings above), that each of us could make 1 general conclusion for all ten movies. What du you think about it? Thank you anyway.

@Rubyfruit76:

What do you think about RaviNathan's comment with the christian propaganda? Might that be problematic?

I couldn't actually finish Pulp Fiction either, but since I failed to see it due to the disgust it caused me, I believe it was fair to rate it.

With Matrix 2 & 3, I can't remeber understanding much, and I couldn't tell one picture from the other. I understand that Pulp Fiction may be liked, but the other 9, I can't understand how they have more than a 5, which I consider generous.

The only thing I know is that I'm not anxious about Matrix 4

@Pencho15 

Hi and thank you for contributing to that poll idea. Do you have any conclusion? Please look at the list. There are several interesting ways to make one. If you really don't want to make a conclusion, I would keep the "N/A" for it. But any of these lists looks more interesting with some words of the contributor. ;)

@Breumaster​ 

Conclusion:

01 and 03 - Hate the way mindless violence is used for comedy

02 - One of the most boring spoof movies I've seen

04 - Found it uninteresting

05 and 06 - incomprehensible that brought nothing to the first and only interestinf part.

07 and 10 - Just empty action with undeveloped and cliched characters that made it impossible to relate to anyone

08 - Going only by this movie, I couldn't understand the appeal of the books

09 - Corny and predictable and failing at many levels to interest me in the topic.

@Pencho15​ 

Thank you, Pencho. I'll add it, but got to sleep now.

This right up my alley, lol... (BTW hey everyone; I've been busy with life xD)

1. Maleficent: How dare you?... I'm still angry.

2. Alice in Wonderland (2010): You have no imagination, do you?

3. Aquaman: Cheesy entertainment that's everyone's favorite?

4. Thor: Ragnarok: Just... eewwwww.

5. Twilight: Need I say more?

6. Frozen 2: You're trying too hard, but also not trying hard enough, somehow.

7. La La Land: BOREDOM.

8. Into the Woods: Hollywood Doesn't Understand Fairy Tales.

9. Pete's Dragon (2016): Disney is Depressing.

10. Titanic: How to Make History Pointless

@Brijesh 

Hi, Brijesh. I'm not really overwhelmed. I just do the same as always. I know about my lack of language skills. Ok, someone comes and tells me that's not good why. I say I'll stay that way. So people start explaining better. That's because I want to understand what the lack is at the moment. The best way to get better explanations is to block at first. So all people in consens try to explain it in the best way. That always works. I've done that in many polls and sometimes it needs to stay hard. Some of my best running polls got on their way with that. Just look at the discussion of my poll The Biggest Movie Losers. That was a hard way to go, but it was successful at the end. ;)

(In a time, my language skills were much worse than today)

@Brijesh 

I re-wrote the intro, because the word snubbing seems not easy to use. I shortened the intro and tried to get to the point better. Mayby now it's less misunderstandable. ;)

Thanks Breumaster. This is quite good. If I get 3 or more things get going at once, I feel overwhelmed myself. So, if your are fine, that is good enough. :)

If you could still share your thoughts on my original question that would be great. Otherwise I will think it over.

I am confused whether to choose high rated movies (rating above 8) that I don't like (my rating below 6) or not so high rated movies(6.5 to 8) that I dislike (my rating below 1-5). It seems I am one of that person whose ratings mostly matches with IMDb.

What would you prefer?

@Brijesh 

It is simple: There is a movie above 6.5/10  with 10.000+ ratings.

You choose one of them, obviously one you dislike and put it on your list

with a little text and therewith bash it. If you really have chosen the same

rating like all other voters together, this poll might be not your cup of meat. ;)

Your texts should be truely felt and match to the movies as you experienced them.

Ok. Though it will never be my cup of meat, I am vegetarian!! :D

Let me try. I am starting with these, probably I will need to search more to come up with the others. (Added more)

1. American Beauty (1999) - Sleazy attempt in the name of beauty
2. The Big Lebowski (1998) - Where is the humor?
3. Clueless (1995) - Clueless! That is how it was
4. Irreversible (2002) - What made me watch this? Haunting!
5. Captain Phillips (2013) - A captain who didn't lead
6. The Impossible (2012) - Impossible to feel the disaster
7. Wild Things (1998) - Who is with whom? Confusing, uninteresting.
8. Young Sherlock Homes (1985) - Shame on the name of Sherlock
9. Due Date (2010) - Even reading the title makes me go to sleep
10. Soul Surfer (2011) - Less surfing, No soul.

Thank you for contributing, Brijesh. I've put your suggestions on the list. Give me the missing parts, when you are ready for. Or before it becomes time to go live with it. (I don't know yet, when this will be.)

P.S.: Sorry for the cup of meat. So get your cup of fruit salad. ;)

It's fine, all in good humor!!

I have added other titles. :)

@Brijesh 

Hi, Brijesh. :D

I added the numbers you added.

Regarding Minority Report, I was 'butthurt' by two things:
-they made the interesting premise rely more on fantasy than on science fiction. How much more relevant could the movie have been if the predictions were based on data analysis?

-The focus was too much on the detective story. We get the impression that except for one instance of corruption, the system works pretty well. I would have liked to see how people handle a world where their thoughts and feelings are screened by the state.

As far as I remember, both faults are also present in the short story.

The Avengers - I just don't find Marvel humor very funny most of the time. The fights are not choreographed well, don't convey a sense of what's at stake, and don't make good use of the characters' specific traits or the situation. The heroes are too sleek, smug, and smooth-edged for my taste, and I find it hard to root for them as they nonchalantly destroy a big city.

The Revenant - torture porn elevated by vague mysticism, with a lead role that requires blood, sweat, and toil from Leonardo DiCaprio, but not much of his skill as an actor.

The Shape of Water - while more visually extravagant than the 50's creature features this was inspired by, this movie is just as devoid of any subtlety. The villain has no more ambiguity than the 'Creature of the Black Lagoon'. The references to older movies are plain and come without any further insight or a clever or funny touch of originality.

But I don't mean to offend people who like these movies. As you say, to each their own.

Everyone has movies he likes and others he dislikes.

No need to look down on another, because of different tastes.

Official critics do roast movies, too. But it will be interesting

to see the reactions of the voters, isn't it?

@albstein 

Hallo, albstein. :D

Thank you for contributing. I'm sorry, I'm a little late with it, but did totally miss you between all the comments on the page. Finally I've put your contribution to the list. I would find it better, if you made 1 statement to each movie, but I surely accept your whole in one conclusion. It's better than no conclusion. ;)

@ElMaruecan82 

Thank you for contributing, ElMo. :D

Your ideas are on the list.

*bump*

@jaf_ismael​ 

Hi Jaf, thank you. I wonder a little about Jaws. Mostly horror fans celebrate non-CGI-splatter-effects. Anyway ... as I granted I'll put your personal picks on the list. Thank you for the explanations. Your option supports diversity.

@Breumaster​ 

(maybe another title will do)

@Tsarstepan​ 

Tsar, the making of that idea is not of that neutral style we normaly do and that is fully intended. I use the harsh and rough words to show up the anger and negative feelings of the IMDb-users about the movies on their lists. So "scorned" and "bashing" are terms which should show the hate, beating and battering on those movies. I did this intentionally in an exaggerated way to make the voters see they should not be to serious in this issue, themselves. But thank you for the correction about "scorned". :D

Good grief. Now @riverotter is being unfairly caught in the antispam predator bot. Don't keep posting Riverotter until it's fixed. All of your posts here have been targeted (false positive as spam) by the antispam bot.

@riverotter :

May I suggest to re-arrange the list a little, or if not, keep the order and at least take another image from your list? Now we have 'Pulp Fiction' twice as image in the voting-list. If you are not ok with it, I'll do as you stated your list and still put 'Pulp Fiction' as the selectable option.