The ludicrous "new subgenres" continue to be deplorable

I deleted one today. Remember to include an explanation.

Hi @bradley_kent -

Can you post some of the recent 18-digit submission reference numbers associated with the sub-genre keyword deletions you referenced that were declined?  Our staff can then investigate further.

Cheers!

I can, of course, go into my contribution history to give you examples, but the problem continues in current submission as well.

The problem has been generated by the "blocks" on deletions put on the egregious and absolutely unnecessary "new subgenres/keywords."

Let me give you just one example:

The keyword "art" currently lists 5021 titles.  Adding the documentary genre to a search uncovers 5021 titles.  If "art-documentary" is to be an acceptable subgenre/keyword, you need to add it to 4238 titles.  This, of course, is all just redundancy and duplication.

Instead of adding these repetitive and unnecessary "subgenre/keywords," wouldn't it be a better policy to inform and reinforce the guidelines that place limits on the use of existing genres in keywords?

Some of these "new subgenres/keywords" are additionally absolutely ridiculous and reveal a lack of knowledge regarding dramatic/comedic theory and practice.  There are many examples, but here's just one to ponder: "satire-comedy."  Is satire anything OTHER than comedy? Absolutely not.  Another: "sitcom-comedy"? What's next: "situatonal-sitcom-comedy"? "comedic-comedy"? Ridiculous.  

By adding and supporting these "new subgenre/keywords," IMDb is revealing itself to be void of logic and intelligence.