Taylor's profile
Employee

Employee

 • 

1.9K Messages

 • 

35.4K Points

Wed, Dec 2, 2020 7:28 PM

Title pages — new version available for sneak peek

IMDb is working on updates to the Title page. The new version of the page is mobile-responsive, meaning all features are available on devices of all sizes, and has a modern look and feel — otherwise it maintains all the functionality of the current page, though some features have moved on the page.

The new version of the page is available to a limited group of fans during a beta period. During the beta, some features are still under construction, and you may encounter bugs.

UPDATE: now available!

  • Recently viewed
  • Related News
  • Awards & Top 250
  • More like this
  • Character” links are now included in the Cast section.
  • The Episodes section now includes a link to all top-rated episodes for TV series.

For more information, check out this Help article.

Responses

6 Messages

 • 

110 Points

6 m ago

The problem I am having is that the as you can see when you right click on the old IMDB site I have what is called Save Image As on the new IMDB site I do not have that option and a lot of other stuff is missing from the new site when you right click on the picture. I am working on creating a database for movies that I want and I am adding the image of the movie to this database. Is there a way this can be added back. See the two images below.

6 Messages

 • 

110 Points

6 m ago

The problem I am having is that the as you can see when you right click on the old IMDB site I have what is called Save Image As on the new IMDB site I do not have that option and a lot of other stuff is missing from the new site when you right click on the picture. I am working on creating a database for movies that I want and I am adding the image of the movie to this database. Is there a way this can be added back. See the two images below.

Note: This comment was created from a merged conversation originally titled Right Click on movie cover

Champion

 • 

4.2K Messages

 • 

109.3K Points

6 m ago

just reported this via the problem form:

went from main page 
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt13891906/
to company page:
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt13891906/companycredits?ref_=tt_ql_sm&mode=desktop&rtm=1
clicked on cast/crew link, got MOBILE version
https://m.imdb.com/title/tt13891906/fullcredits?ref_=ttco_ql_1
don't want mobile version

1 Message

 • 

60 Points

6 m ago

nice site but I noticed that you dont have the episode / film lenth on the top of the page like the old site. I just found that info very useful.

2 Messages

 • 

72 Points

6 m ago

You don't know that this looks horrible on desktop? I can't believe I even have to make this comment.

2 Messages

 • 

72 Points

6 m ago

I can't believe you need me to tell you how horrible this is. You can't just look at it on a desktop and see that it doesn't work?

Shameful.

4 Messages

 • 

92 Points

6 m ago

"urgh! what the hell is this piece of crap?" Honest reaction to IMDB's future page design. Like, "urrgh!" Whiteness, more bright than the sun, on scroll, after a pitch, 'dark side of the moon' black, on-page-open? smh. Fire the web designer, right now! Kidding, but not really. WTH? ... Using the same manerisms as Family Guy's Consuela...."no no no no no no".

Note: This comment was created from a merged conversation originally titled yeah..who? and more importantly, why?

Champion

 • 

4.2K Messages

 • 

109.3K Points

6 m ago

Is there some reason Keywords are not labeled as such?

3 Messages

 • 

80 Points

6 m ago

That turned into your misconception all the manner around with the weakest so known as source viable it really is located with a simple google search -a bot generated spam web page that uses a scraped old version of imdb statistics-
I simply said it wishes to be proved with a actual proof that you did no longer provide.

2 Messages

 • 

72 Points

6 m ago

I don't know how to recheck a movie which I have already seen on the new website version...

Note: This comment was created from a merged conversation originally titled Checkins broken

5 Messages

 • 

100 Points

6 m ago

This is terrible. The old version allows you to see everything all at once. This is like looking at it on a mobile device. Ridiculous change. No reason for it. I really hope there is a classic view or whatever option added to settings to keep it the current way because along with all the other crap the intrusive take over from Amazon has caused I may for the first time in 15 years need to find a new site for movie info.

And for the record I don't use the mobile version of any informational sites including this one because all you do is scroll around trying to find what you want instead of entire cast and stuff on page. It is not user friendly and will cause nothing but a bunch of extra scrolling and crap including extra clicks to find info. Stop trying to make it cool and all pretty and just leave it in the informative format it is now.

3 Messages

 • 

80 Points

6 m ago

Hello everyone!

I am sorry but i have been using the new version since the very first days and now i switched back to old version. i was patient, but always obfuscated. The new version is not good and i dont mean visually. In your way to make it responsive you have moved the info here and there without considering the way the info should be read, say, the left to right rule is not respected, among other primordial things, like the size of the date, or the genres. Obfuscated by the way the new version dictates my eye to look at the info: it feels like if reading a book and after the first line on top left of page, you would have to go look at bottom right of the next page to keep reading, and then back at the top right of the earlier page, and then to the bottom-left of the next one, and again to the top-left where you started.  The spacing of the info is not good: you have to offer us sections where the eye naturally displaces after page is loaded, ltr sections here and there which shows a CLUSTER of hierarchized info, info of a certain type here (float :left), and a certain less important type there (float:right). It is the way the user reads -ltr- (which is the way we 'cognize') what determines the hierarchy and the size of the info: the old version has it PERFECT: title, date, rate, time, genre, release; poster, video, resume, and then, on the right -which comes as a blindspot for the eye- the less important info (imdb rate, votes etc). It would be wise if the new version would not break this structure. My advice to you guys is to respect the old version logic as it is well-thought and helps us to displace quickly on each page!    

(edited)

3 Messages

 • 

80 Points

6 m ago

Hello everyone!

I am sorry but i have been using the new version since the very first days and now i switched back to old version. i was patient, but always obfuscated. The new version is not good and i dont mean visually. In your way to make it responsive you have moved the info here and there without considering the way the info should be read, say, the left to right rule is not respected, among other primordial things, like the size of the date, or the genres. Obfuscated by the way the new version dictates my eye to look at the info: it feels like if reading a book and after the first line on top left of page, you would have to go look at bottom right of the next page to keep reading, and then back at the top right of the earlier page, and then to the bottom-left of the next one, and again to the top-left where you started.  The spacing of the info is not good: you have to offer us sections where the eye naturally displaces after page is loaded, ltr sections here and there which shows a CLUSTER of hierarchized info, info of a certain type here (float :left), and a certain less important type there (float:right). It is the way the user reads -ltr- (which is the way we 'cognize') what determines the hierarchy and the size of the info: the old version has it PERFECT: title, date, rate, time, genre, release; poster, video, resume, and then, on the right -which comes as a blindspot for the eye- the less important info (imdb rate, votes etc). It would be wise if the new version would not break this structure. My advice to you guys is to respect the old version logic as it is well-thought and helps us to displace quickly on each page!    

Note: This comment was created from a merged conversation originally titled The new version is not good and i dont mean visually.

(edited)

2 Messages

 • 

70 Points

6 m ago

The new site in my opinion really has gone backwards.

How can it be removed so it more like the previous version

Note: This comment was created from a merged conversation originally titled how to complain about the new site

46 Messages

 • 

546 Points

6 m ago

Horrible. As every single change IMDb does.