Naxos's profile

3 Messages

 • 

80 Points

Monday, January 25th, 2021 12:50 AM

Closed

The new version is not good and i dont mean visually.

Hello everyone!

I am sorry but i have been using the new version since the very first days and now i switched back to old version. i was patient, but always obfuscated. The new version is not good and i dont mean visually. In your way to make it responsive you have moved the info here and there without considering the way the info should be read, say, the left to right rule is not respected, among other primordial things, like the size of the date, or the genres. Obfuscated by the way the new version dictates my eye to look at the info: it feels like if reading a book and after the first line on top left of page, you wd have to go look at bottom of the next page to keep reading, and then back at the top right of the earlier page, and then to the bottom-left of the next one, and again to the top-left where you started.  The spacing of the info is not good: you have to offer us sections where the eye naturally displaces after page is loaded, ltr sections here and there which shows a CLUSTER of hierarchized info, info of a certain type here (float :left), and a certain less important type there (float:right). It is the way the user reads -ltr- (which is the way we 'cognize') what determines the hierarchy and the size of the info: the old version has it PERFECT: title, date, rate, time, genre, release; poster, video, resume, and then, on the right -which comes as a blindspot for the eye- the less important info (imdb rate, votes etc). It would be wise if the new version would not break this structure. My advice to you guys is to respect the old version logic as it is well-thought and helps us to displace quickly on each page!    

This conversation has been merged. Please refer the main conversation:

Title pages — new version available for sneak peek

No Responses!