2 Messages

 • 

136 Points

Friday, April 17th, 2026

Solved

Sign in to access user reviews

Good evening,

today I noticed I can't read user reviews anymore on imdb.com :(. I don't have an imdb.com account. I also don't have an amazon.com account.

Is this a bug? Or is it a new change on imdb.com? I hope it's a bug.

Thanks in advance.

Regards

Andreas

Oldest First
Selected Oldest First

Accepted Solution

Official Solution

Employee

 • 

18.4K Messages

 • 

322.7K Points

22 days ago

Hi andreasmueller -

We're updating how you access user reviews on IMDb which will require you to sign in to view, write, edit, or report reviews. This will roll out to all users over the next few weeks. 

This extra step is part of our ongoing effort to keep IMDb's reviews a space for genuine, human voices.

I hope this helps clarify!

44 Messages

 • 

848 Points

@Michelle​ This comes a big, sudden surprise to me, and a very unwelcome one. Being able to read reviews is nearly as essential to me, and I think most casual users, as being able to see and read basic movie details like cast and crew, trivia, awards, connections etc.

Or will these features slowly but surely also be restricted to registered users? 

Please take into account that being able to interact with the review section, like writing, editing or reporting, has always been restricted to registered users, so this doesn't explain the change. 

A legitimate reason could be, that user reviews (should) convey genuine, personal views, which unfortunately can now be harvested and abused freely by A.I., and regenerated as 'new' opinions here and elsewhere. 

This is a very real problem for all online content of course, which I can imagine has far greater impact than just the user review section.

Is this your way of trying to protect our authorship?

With best regards,

Richard

(edited)

2 Messages

 • 

136 Points

@Michelle​ thank you for the information. Of course it makes me sad that it's not just a bug, but an intended change :(. I had hopes, hehe.

Have a nice day.

Regards

Andreas

2 Messages

 • 

70 Points

@Michelle​ 

This, "This extra step is part of our ongoing effort to keep IMDb's reviews a space for genuine, human voices," response is BS from Amazon. As always, Amazon prioritizes data collection, and its bottom line - over consumer experience (e.g. Amazon's Rufus AI disaster).

Amazon should stop absorbing actually useful services like IMDB if they're only going to kneecap them for consumers.

There's no legitimate user-facing reason for this change, other than Amazon's desire to collect ever more telemetry data from consumers.

Shameful.

6 Messages

 • 

120 Points

@Michelle​ The reason given for now requiring registration - just to merely SEE the reviews - makes no sense, as others have pointed out. So we are left to conclude what the real reason is: IMDb wants to collect personal information from more of their visitors so they can sell it to third parties. Also, marketers can learn things about us as individuals from knowing which films and TV shows interest us enough that we click to read user reviews about them. But IMDb will soon find itself losing more than it gains once people start spending less time engaged on the site as a result (or even no longer visiting for the minimal remaining information that can always be found elsewehere.)

(edited)

44 Messages

 • 

848 Points

I still hope it's about protecting personal contributors' content, but it's up to the staff to properly explain. As IMDb so heavily relies on data and opinions provided by users and insiders (IMBb doesn't feature any staff-produced reviews or other editorial content, as far as I know, unlike some other media sites), it's vitally important for them to retain user loyalty. 

Yes, users can provide IMDb links to external reviews, which may be of higher quality, but these are often hidden behind paywalls, or else will produce mostly dead links after some years, due to all these rampant takeovers, bankruptcies, layout revisions and 'old' content scrubbing.

I'd also like to remind the staff that comparable media databases, like AllMovie, The Movie DB, Rotten Tomatoes, MUBI, MovieChat, Letterboxd, MovieMeter, TVTropes, AllMusic etc. all feature publicly accessible user reviews - though these aren't meant to be quality endorsements. 

As for user preference tracking, I think most of us know by now that companies collect cookies anyway when you haven't even registered at a site, so? 

(edited)

8.9K Messages

 • 

180.4K Points

@Michelle​ 

Michelle:We're updating how you access user reviews on IMDb

which will require you to sign in to view, report reviews. 

This is not a good idea 😫

sign in to  write, edit  reviews.

Is OK 😀

- - -

https://community-imdb.sprinklr.com/conversations/imdbcom/imdb-name-page-redesign/6351563ae7100d725d54c0bb?commentId=63878b2b038ef261b8f4b7fb&replyId=6387e1b00693e36e8a570bfa

Col_Needham,Employee

Wednesday, November 30th, 2022

@ACT_1​ 

and Many that do not register!!

Correct, registered customers make-up only a fraction of our userbase. 

IMDb has over 200 million unique visitors per month

(and that's visitors not visits, the latter being significantly higher).  

.

(edited)

210 Messages

 • 

5.5K Points

@Richard_J

Reffering to your statement: 

"As for user preference tracking, I think most of us know by now that companies collect cookies anyway when you haven't even registered at a site, so? "

PS: Cookies are not registered if you for example  have sett up your browser to delete all of them every time you close your browser for example. Or if you look at the site in a private tab. Or if you every day before you close your computer for the day deletes all new cookies from the last 24H (thus keeping cookies for logins etc, but deletes all new cookies). etc, etc,etc. 

I personally use IMDb logged in anyway, but I know lotts of people who don't, including elderly people who don't have the capacity to logg inn, and people who don't want to logg inn etc.etc.

And the adds will still show for people not logged inn, so there would still be income from unregistered users also. 

6 Messages

 • 

120 Points

@Richard_JYes, cookies can be user-managed by those who bother to do it.  They affect what ads will appear on a page for you, but they also store a record of everything you browsed on the site.  So the problem here is that IMDb now wants your activity (all of it) to be connected with a personally identifiable individual, using the ability to see the reviews as a lure.  We all agree that requiring registration might be warranted for visitors who want to WRITE reviews, or request edits to the database, but why for mere visitors who don't go beyond looking at the reviews (and seeing ads)? There seems to be no benign reason for IMDb wanting to do this that could stand up to logical scrutiny. And, as I said, there are privacy implications when our personal information reaches third parties, whether they have some trusted affiliation with IMDb or not. 

8.9K Messages

 • 

180.4K Points

@Michelle​ 

IMDb counts how many Reviews are read

This number will drop way low

if Readers need to Register

(Fewer folks will be reading your ads!!)

.

(edited)

10.7K Messages

 • 

226.4K Points

I just noticed this. Such a disappointment.

8.9K Messages

 • 

180.4K Points

11,421,500 reviews

Something Very Bad Is Going to Happen

Review by MrCluckCluck

Apr 25, 2026

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt32937780/review/rw11421500/

https://www.imdb.com/user/p.ktldha7b5xxneth7v2glasqrii/

_ _ _

214,524,000 Users registered

Jackson-4652

Joined Apr 2026

https://www.imdb.com/user/ur214524000/

https://www.imdb.com/user/p.2sgtb3krtez24hsdqilyd5bjn4

_ _ _ _ _

41,808,900 Titles

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt41808900/reference/

The Hopeful Humanist Cafe

Episode 57 - BOOMPF ..."It's Create a Word Day!"

Podcast Episode  November 22, 2020

---

ACT_1:

Podcasts are added late and have no Cast & Crew

Why are they here??

16,203,686 Podcasts

https://www.imdb.com/search/title/?title_type=podcast_episode

_ _ _ _

Michael

April 24, 2026 (United States)

Jaafar Jackson : Michael

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt11,378,946/reference/

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt11378946/reviews/

1,143 reviews

_ _ _ _ 

4,176,610,910 Lists

https://www.imdb.com/list/ls4176610910/

dgranger

Created Sunday, April 26th, 2026

What is The Best Disaster Movie on a Spaceship or in Space?

.

(edited)

10.7K Messages

 • 

226.4K Points

I noticed that in addition to the matter of topic.

210 Messages

 • 

5.5K Points

22 days ago

@Col_Needham​  People are complaining on the Reddit IMDb forum also about having to logg inn to IMDb to see user reviews on titles, is this also a bug?  Note: This comment was created from a merged conversation Link : https://community-imdb.sprinklr.com/conversations/imdbcom/accessing-user-reviews/69e294effe47d80875ce8816 Title : Accessing user reviews

Employee

 • 

8.4K Messages

 • 

194K Points

@Kristin​ Please see Michelle’s reply above. 

210 Messages

 • 

5.5K Points

@Col_Needham@Michelle​ 

  1. That does not answer my question as to why you do this "undercover", and don't announce it like you usually do with other changes.

2. Also 

"This extra step is part of our ongoing effort to keep IMDb's reviews a space for genuine, human voices."

Does not explain why people have to log inn to READ, is it a big problem with computers reading reviews?

3.

As mentioned in my comment that was deleted on the original post, IMDb users on the IMDb forum on Reddit are RAGING at the moment. 

44 Messages

 • 

848 Points

@Col_Needham​ We're still waiting for a proper, comprehensive explanation. This will simply not do. Apart from just a commercial enterprise, IMDb has become the most comprehensive and authoritative worldwide media database anywhere, and as such by now an essential part of our collective cultural heritage. It's vitally important to protect its status.

(edited)

10.7K Messages

 • 

226.4K Points

I would speculate that there are worries about folks posting reviews generated by a transformer architecture software trained on data collected from reviews posted from other accounts, who might be employing "word calculator" aides to write theirs as well, which just contributes to model collapse. By placing all of this behind the registration wall, it becomes easier to track which review audiences are entirely-manual, partially-manual partially-automated and entirely-automated, even entirely-automated in "artificially-intelligent" way, and it also gives whatever deep-learning models being run by IMDb developers a competitive edge of some kind.

44 Messages

 • 

848 Points

@jeorj_euler​ Thank you! Yes, this sounds very plausible indeed, but why not be open about it? 

Still, as I pointed out above, I would really hate to see important features like these go behind walls on IMDb and similar sites. What's next? All IMDb Trivia and Lists inaccessible? Wikipedia on registration only? Would we have to register everywhere we look for information?

I've always believed that investing in constant, human monitoring (I guess now with the aid of A.I. as an indicative, though not decisive tool) would be the best way to go to keep sites safe and relevant. 

(edited)

2 Messages

 • 

70 Points

@jeorj_euler​ You are still conflating issues here. The pushback here is against credentialed viewing of IMDB data, not posting. They are (and should be) completely different permission models.

10.7K Messages

 • 

226.4K Points

Regardless of "conflating" issues, I do understand that the here pushback against credentialed viewing of IMDB data.

That part might be described as a no-brainer.

Somehow the situation is so severe that the IMDb site authorities don't even want to risk an anonymous bot being able to view IMDb data. Technically it could be brokered (and probably already is being brokered), but in such a case, it might not be difficult to figure out through which accounts the brokering is being facilitated, and to deliberately compromise the integrity of the data being viewed via those accounts. Which leads me to wonder if the way the IMDb website shows up is identical (to begin with lately) in terms of content, regardless of which account is signed in, where the accessing device is geographically located or which operating system and browser are being used. For all I know, some things (important enough things) are tailored to the disparate biases of the viewing audience, across demographics or even individually. So, in other words, IMDb probably has its own deep learning software, and the IMDb developers might just be trying to protect what it consumes from other bots. Still, this is just speculation on my part.

6 Messages

 • 

120 Points

@jeorj_euler​  There is no need to lean over backwards trying to imagine any reason other than the obvious one.  Previously, it was only if a visitor wanted to add or change information that registering was required. Yes, THAT was in the interest of security and insuring accountability for accurate contributions. But requiring registration just to look at reviews must be the initial stage of an effort to further monetize the site in one way or another.  So far, any visitor to the site can still see credits, background information, photos and trailers. But later they may wall off some of those other things as well. The wider tracking of interaction by registered users will then generate more information about the interests of each as an individual, who will now be personally identifiable to data brokers and marketers.  This may also be a trial balloon to measure how badly people want to keep using IMDb overall. If that's the case, then it could lead them to actually begin charging us just to see much of what used to be free.

10.7K Messages

 • 

226.4K Points

Indeed, and I've made observations in the past about the general pattern of how features are removed or modified, one feature at a time, as part of a broad plan for the site. If the bit just concerning viewing of reviews is part of more general plan to do similar with the whole site, I'd think it has to do with the "zero clicks" paranoia that the maintainers of some major sites have, such as when a large number of people don't bother to even visit a website because what search engine summarizer shows about a topic is perceived as sufficient by such a large number of people.

With regard to the bigger picture, we have for reference the way Instagram, Facebook and Twitter have trended toward being increasingly walled off to viewing by unregistered visitors, meanwhile some platforms that are fundamentally walled off are beginning to or at least planning to implement age verification "to comply with the law", usually European Union stuff that just winds up being imposed globally.

1 Message

 • 

66 Points

22 days ago

Why don't you keep reviews open for people who just want to read? I live in Ukraine, and my mobile carriers don't receive SMS from Amazon. Now I can't use IMDb for anything at all. Thanks a lot.

1 Message

 • 

62 Points

20 days ago

Register just to read some reviews is ridiculous.

2 Messages

 • 

70 Points

20 days ago

Hi, I'm new, but I wish there was a way to set up an account independent from my Amazon account.  Too close for my comfort.  I'd also like to voice criticism over the changes you've made to user reviews.  Locking them behind requiring sign-up will actively hurt consumers. Note: This comment was created from a merged conversation Link : https://community-imdb.sprinklr.com/conversations/imdbcom/change-login-info-to-separate-from-amazon-account/69e572cf5ebb560bf4ef9e4e Title : Change login info to separate from Amazon account

2 Messages

 • 

70 Points

15 days ago

How is it that I can no longer peruse all the User Reviews?  If I click any partial "featured reviews" it goes to the same Summary Review.  I prefer to scroll thru them to determine an overall perspective. Note: This comment was created from a merged conversation Link : https://community-imdb.sprinklr.com/conversations/imdbcom/users-reviews/69ebb299d75f1969360205d9 Title : Users Reviews