IMDb Web Title Subpages Redesign

@cinemacriterion​ -- good question. The current redesign is for mobile Web and Desktop. Thanks.

Hi, @bderoes​:

Items with the same release date are sorted by country code.

Cheers!

@ljdoncel​ 

Aha. Always dislike sorts that use un-displayed information for ordering.

@bderoes​ Also, that's only when there's a tie for the same release date.  The primary sort order is chronological, for example, see https://www.imdb.com/title/tt7405458/releaseinfo

BTW these are exactly the same primary and secondary sort orders as the previous version of the /title/releaseinfo page. 

Hope this helps. 

@Col_Needham​ 

I wish you had replied to this instead:

But specific to the Release info itself: I'm disappointed that an Expand All link is not near the top of each category (Release Date, AKA), as we have on the primary Name pages for Credits. Instead we have to scroll down and click the "nn more" link. I know my country will be alphabetized low on the list, so I'd like the ability to expand the list up top.

@bderoes​ The product and design teams will largely be handling this thread directly and they will see your comment, thanks. I was just clarifying the point on the sort order.  

@bderoes - thank you for your feedback about the Expand All design. The Web team considered various options, including your suggestion. In addition to incorporating customer feedback, the team went with the new Expand All design to make it simple to review different subpage sections at a glance, with an abbreviated list for each, and expand while browsing (vs. returning to the section title).

I shared your recommendation with the team. We will review it and other valuable feedback as we continue to redesign the site and experiment with new features and more. Please feel free to reach out again at any time - thanks. 

The re-designers are doing everything in their power to obscure anything that even remotely constitutes a comprehensive view of information. I'm getting bored, pointing this out every at single stage of the overall rollout of the new/current generation software platform of the website, but I will probably keep doing it. An interesting thing to note also, is that these people working at IMDb pretend not to understand the value of something like the Internet Archive Wayback Machine: "Why would you want to use that silly thing, when you can view the information live?" Haha.

@jean_morel​ -- thank you for using IMDb and your extensive contributions to make it the most authoritative source for entertainment content. I have shared your design and feature feedback with our team to review.

Specific to your language experience (French), you might want to confirm your content preferences and browser preferred language (country might be set to France, without a preferred language, etc.). You can also set your IMDb language to English (see the navigation bar feature next to your name or "Sign In") or desired listed language.

Please let us know if you continue to see language or other issues. Thanks, and please reach out again at any time.

@jean_morel​ It is NOT better.  It just isn't. I really don't understand what is going on with this site.  Redesigning page after page and making them sooooo much worse, makes no sense.  Who is coming up with this.  And with the announcements, I feel as if I am being gaslighted:

The refreshed pages are meant to make your IMDb experience easier and more enjoyable by providing improved access to TV and movie content on any device and when on the go. 

My experience has not been easier or more enjoyable in any way.  Furthermore, improved access to content is the exact opposite of what has occurred.

The redesign follows ongoing site improvements and reflects changes suggested by IMDb customers, as well as our own in-depth research 

If The IMDb Team were actually interested in customer suggestions, then maybe a quick scan over any one of the posts after posts after posts of not just negative feedback but also suggestions for improvement would be a good place to start.  I would love to know what kind of "in-depth research" resulted in this.

In the coming months, we will continue to update IMDb pages throughout the site. 

Please DON'T

We hope you enjoy these latest and upcoming improvements,

We DON'T

@BeeAKiddo​ -- Thank you for providing feedback about the new Title Subpages. I understand your general frustration with site updates, and we welcome specific feedback about improvements that you believe would be useful. Feel free to share them with me here, and I will pass them to relevant teams to consider as we continue to enhance the site, whether on existing updates or those still to come.

Thank you for using IMDb. Please feel free to reach out again at any time.

An absolute PITA to see if a release date is already there or not when attempting to contribute to IMDb due to having to drop down and now it causes more work. I use the "reference" page for a reason, because everything is condensed.

@jean_morel​ Hi Jean. Sadly I see my comments mysteriously disappeared. Guess free speech isn't what it used to be - just like the new IMDB

I'm not aware of any significant change in the censorship/filtering model of the IMDb Community forum on Sprinklr. Always has been the case that messages that are uncomfortably too far off topic or containing dangerously misleading misinformation would likely be removed, and of course, harassing, belittling and flaming, or plain gibberish and unsolicited commercial advertisements, are subject to removal. Criticizing anybody purely on account of sex, ethnicity, ancestry, nationality, color, "race", faith, age, sexual orientation, gender identity, ability/disability, health/disease or human qualities dimensions like those is obviously also not allowed, There is also some automation involved with regard to messages containing hyperlinks to obscure websites. In threads that are very large but also very important to IMDb's missions, sometimes clutter is removed, as in messages that don't really provide any value to the thread, including empty praise, empty condemnation and irrelevant information.

@raynor_pretorius  We can explain what happened here.  Yesterday there was a large failure in our ad serving systems affecting the entire site.  The failure was huge and intrusive placing fragments of ads on top of page content and changing colours & fonts.  This was quickly reported and was being tracked on https://community-imdb.sprinklr.com/conversations/imdbcom/bad-guys-trailer-stomping-all-over-imdb-pages-ho-hum-yet-another-badlybehaved-advert/63e50ce30a803f3817a443dc 

The errors were mistaken for deliberate design changes and people posted on this thread plus on other threads related to the design changes. To avoid the confusion which would persist once the ad issue was fixed, we cleared the official design threads of such posts.  These posts should have been made on the other thread and unfortunately there were too many to move. Your post was likely swept up in this, sorry. 

@Col_Needham​ Thanks

As I often select the title and search google with it, so it is very unconvenient.

Are there any way to capture the title of the song and store to clipboard?  (It is possible to use Edit and select correct/delete, however it takes much time than ever.)

I hope this design will be changed to be better one in near future.

@tozaki​ 

To select the text of the title of the song, start your cursor on the beginning of the line under the title.

Actually, on this page, https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0045152/soundtrack

the year appears right under, and selecting that too helps with the google search. 

Once selected, I'm able to right-click and choose the Search Google option.

@bderoes​ Thank you for your reply. It dose not work for me as I use Firefox.
Now I found it works on Google Chrome and Safari on Mac.

If someone who are respoisible for the design read this message, please confirm it.
And do not use <button> tag for important data, because the text cannot be selectable with Firefox.

@tozaki - I write to confirm whether you were able to mirror the soundtrack copy (title/year) on Firefox that you were doing on Chrome.

The feature works as @bderoes explained for me on Firefox like it does on Chrome (for you). If you are experiencing issues, please feel free to share an screenshots, specific steps, etc. to help resolve any problem you are facing (or identify an unknown bug). Thanks again for your feedback and using IMDb.

@Kevin_Powell  To make it clear, I repeat.

I cannot select the title of soundtrack in Firefox, whereas it is selectable in Chrome and Safari.

With Firefox, even I type Command+A (on Mac) to select all, the title part is not included to the text on the clipboard.

Here is a screenshot when I typed Command+A

You see the song title ("Fit as a Fiddle" and "Temptation") is not selected.

That's because the title is surrounded between <button> and </button> in html.  Firefox won't  select the text at button.

@tozaki​ - Thank you for reaching out about the inconsistent experience! I informed the team this morning about your issue, and we moved up work to prioritize a fix. I appreciate your willingness to share this error - please reach out again with any other issues or feedback. Thanks for using IMDb.

This may not related the design change of this time, I know there is other places title is not shown in original.

In reference view, if these is a movie connections, it shows the first 1 title of the related movie. That title is shown in English.  (In connections view, it is shown in original.)

For example, in https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0047243/reference/ , I see the following:

When I click the title or show more link, the title is shown in original "La fils de Gascogne".

@tozaki - thanks for the feedback about your experience on the "/reference/" experience vs redesigned subpages. On our end, the redesigned title page (https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0047243/) does provide a consistent experience for Connections (e.g., Le fils de Gascogne (1995) is displayed, and a click surfaces a title page with the same name)).

If you do see inconsistencies like you mentioned above on the "/reference/" page, please reach out with information. Thanks for providing clear feedback and using IMDb.

@Kevin_Powell  I think you understand what I meant.
If the reference in the connection at the new redesigned page is as expected, the behavior in /reference is a bug.

The same bug is also at /mediaviewer.
Despite of the setting, you see the English title at the are shown at lower position. 

See https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0047243/mediaviewer/rm1792544768/

It shows:

with English title instead of original French.

@tozaki​ - I write to confirm that the team released a fix earlier this week that addressed the localization bug that you spotted. The bug recently surfaced, and I want to thank you again for raising it here. We are happy it was caught and resolved so fast.

Please reach out at any time about any issue. And thank you for using IMDb!

@Kevin_Powell   Do you mean this fix has been released to public or just internal release?  I asked you because nothing changed either in the title in /reference view and /mediainfo view.

@czender​ You're spot on. 👍 When I first discovered the same thing with any celeb I clicked on, I felt not very happy. Clicking for additional information takes unnecessarily more time and energy than we could for many times back.

And what happened to the other subpages made me more like a sorehead. So yes, I do agree that we should have the option to choose between designs as you mentioned.

There is a fulllcredits page, for example,

https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0518178/fullcredits

Currently it needs extra 2 clicks to get this view.  I hope there should be at least a user preference to set this view is default in the Content Setting.

However, there is no such view for releaseinfo to see many AKAs etc. So their should be different view like older ones for those pages.

@tozaki​ I know there is, but it`s way too lenghty to get there

@czender​ Amen to that.

@czender​ - thank you for sharing your recommendations. I have shared your feedback with the team about, during a page load, about options to experiment with content detail display and preserve our intent to simply section title and category name browse. 

Appreciate your direct message. Please feel free to reach out again at any time. Thanks for using IMDb.

@bderoes​ - Thank you for your feedback about episode pages (and subpages) directing to the series page. I have shared your message with the team to review. We intend to follow up with a feature update that touches on your aforementioned recommendation to conveniently navigate to a series page from an episode subpage.

Thanks again for your feedback on the redesigned page. Please reach out again with any other comments or issues.

@bderoes - I write to follow up about the issue you raised about episode pages (and subpages) directing to the series page.

We applied a link on episode subpages to the series page -- e.g., https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0609119/technical. Please let us know if you continue to see the issue or identify others.

We appreciate your willingness to provide detailed redesigned page feedback to preserve a first-rate customer experience. Please continue to provide us feedback on any issue at any time, and thank you for using and contributing to IMDb!

@Kevin_Powell​ 

I'm getting the old version of subpages when using Chrome (recently updated to 109), so I can't see the change there.

But using MS Edge, I see the new design, and the update is welcome. 

However, I now find it strange that the episode title is not linked to the episode. I see that there's a "Back" link in the upper left corner, but "back" is unclear. It would be more obvious if the title itself was linked.

@bderoes - thanks for confirming the update, and you should see it going forward on all browsers.

I have shared your additional feedback with the team for consideration. You're correct - the "Back" button and poster do return you to the series page, but the series name itself does not. This was done by design, but your feedback is neither unsubstantiated nor isolated. It will be revisited by our product, UX, and tech teams. 

Thank you again for all your feedback - please reach out about any issue at any time. 

@robertdimucci661​ -- Thank you for raising the bug on your end and your contributions to IMDb! The runtime issue that you surfaced should be resolved ("The Young Rebel" technical specifications page).

Please let us know whether you continue to see the issue or discover others. We appreciate your willingness to raise bugs and make feature suggestions, and thank you for all your IMDb contributions that help it be the most popular and authoritative entertainment source. Please reach out at any time about any issue.

Wanted to add the link to the Elvis (2022) page:

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt3704428/soundtrack

I'm seeing the old version of the page right now (I've seen the new version before), so maybe they rolled back because they're fixing something.

@serguei_7368274​  Thanks for the bug report.  We have notified the appropriate team and this should be an easy fix. 

@serguei_7368274 -- thank you for raising this important issue. Like @Col_Needham mentioned, the appropriate team was notified this morning and applied a quick fix.

We appreciate your direct feedback to ensure IMDb holds a high bar for customers. Please continue to reach out to us about any issue at any time. And thanks for using IMDb! 

Thanks everybody for the quick fix! 

I agree with @cartman_1337​, especially questioning the value of restricting to the first 5 in a category - on ANY page. Perhaps we need a user parameter that states we want all data displayed on every page during the initial load. Or give us a link for that on each page, and make our choice sticky, so long as "sticky" doesn't depend on cookies/cache that will eventually get cleared to troubleshoot something somewhere (not necessarily on IMDb.)

Related suggestion: also have a parameter that condenses the vertical space on pages to a mode like "text only" on the special Name page for credits - essentially single-spaced.

Some titles have thousands of connections. That's a lot of scrolling. 

@Peter_pbn​ So? You have the "Jump to" button at the top, so getting to any section of connection types you want is quick in any case. And when you do get to that section, you generally want to see all the connections of that type that there are, right?

I forgot to report in my previous post that if you do expand a section and visit a link, the page does not remember that the section was expanded when you return to the page through browser history, but it tries to go to the same scrolling position it was, which usually gives you the bottom of the page upon return, which is also very annoying.

@cartman_1337 - Thank you for your detailed feedback and all your contributions to IMDb.

Regarding the Connections subpage and "expand all" option, I have shared your feedback with our team to review. Your recommendation is not isolated - it has been raised both on Sprinklr and within our team, and we will revisit it.

Specific to returning to the Connections subpage -- after selecting a listed title -- and the sections not respecting previously-selected views (e.g., "[#] more" or "All"), I have forward your details to our team. We agree there is an improvement opportunity.

Thank you again for taking time to share your feedback. We appreciate customers who help us improve IMDb. Please reach out at any time about any issue.

@bderoes - Thank you for your feedback regarding pagination (as a follow to @cartman_1337's post). I shared your suggestions with our team.

Please reach out again about any issue at any time - we value your continued input and contributions to help IMDb be the most popular and authoritative entertainment source. 

Hi @YNOTatTheMovies -

We appreciate the feedback. I have turned this post into an idea so other users can vote on it.

Cheers!

@Bethanny​ Thanks! Yeah, a website's name should not become an advantage/disadvantage for a review to be shown at users' first click due to IMDB's design on how that page is displayed.