Bethanny's profile
Employee

Employee

 • 

5.6K Messages

 • 

58.9K Points

Thursday, October 20th, 2022

IMDb Name Page Redesign

IMDb Name Page Redesign

Image

 

We are excited to announce the launch of IMDb’s redesigned Name pages! These pages are meant to make your IMDb experience easier and more enjoyable by providing better access to photos and videos, an upgraded view of an individual’s credits, and improved mobile navigation making it easier to view IMDb features on the go. These enhancements reflect changes suggested by IMDb customers, as well as our own in-depth research designed to enhance entertainment content, discovery, and navigation. More information is available in the FAQ on the help page.

We hope you enjoy these latest improvements, and thank you for continuing to make IMDb the world’s most trusted source for movie, TV, and entertainment content.

— The IMDb Team

 

English | Français | Deutsch | हिन्दी | Italiano | Português | Español

Oldest First
Selected Oldest First

1 Message

 • 

60 Points

3 years ago

The previous design had horizontal scroll on an actor's past credits, which showed their past movies/tv show in a larger icon. This made it easier to quickly browse to see where you might know them from.

New design has tiny icons. Would also love an option to revert to the old design.

10.7K Messages

 • 

226.1K Points

Just to note, Emilie here is describing the way the IMDb name pages looked on the last generation mobile rendition of IMDb. I also agree that the way the "known for" section used to look and function (on the presentations for both the mobile and desktop) was more suitable than what we have now with all the empty space within each box item in the particular section. I will have to create a script that condenses it in such a way that less scrolling is needed to view the items.

8 Messages

 • 

166 Points

Could that be written as a bookmarklet that you could share with us? A bookmarklet format would be the perfect method to resize or suppress images on the pages, and so simple to add and run. Thanks

10.7K Messages

 • 

226.1K Points

Usually I start with a bookmarklet and then adapt (copy and paste) the code into to a monkey script that would run automatically.

2 Messages

 • 

72 Points

3 years ago

So as far as I can tell, this updated format only occurs when you're looking at an *actor's* page, and not the page of a film. Why in the world would you take an effective interface, working perfectly at doing two jobs, perhaps even streamlining use of the site due to it's lack of complication. And then here we are now, changing half the site into a convoluted mess and leaving the previously successful code intact, just underutilized. What a joke. 

10.7K Messages

 • 

226.1K Points

Hi, Raphaelraven​. Welcome to the IMDb Community forum! Do you use title reference view? If not, then I'm confused about your statement, "this updated format only occurs when you're looking at an *actor's* page, and not the page of a film."

Employee

 • 

8.2K Messages

 • 

190.3K Points

@Raphaelraven

And then here we are now, changing half the site

It sounds like you are (perhaps accidentally) opted into the alternate view of title pages which is specifically aimed only at top data contributors who need to be able to compare the IMDb listing with the end credits of a title.  If you visit the Content Settings page, uncheck the box in the Contributors section and press the submit button, this will restore the title pages to the standard view which is compatible with the new name pages.  The title pages were updated in the summer of 2021.

The new name pages are part of a design & technology upgrade which is being launched gradually across different page types and is aimed at better scaling IMDb for the future.  Other pages which already launched beyond name and title include the home, what to watch, video, and photo pages.

You might find our update from Wednesday helpful, particularly the point around the “All credits” view -> https://community-imdb.sprinklr.com/conversations/imdbcom/imdb-name-page-redesign/6351563ae7100d725d54c0bb?commentId=63878b2b038ef261b8f4b7fb

Hope this helps.

1 Message

 • 

96 Points

3 years ago

If imdb reaaly cared about us users they would read the feedback here and realize with 99% negative feedback that there is something wrong with the new page layout and fire / replace the designers , in any other industry if engineers screwed up like this they would be fired !

2 Messages

 • 

70 Points

3 years ago

can i revert back to the old look of imdb. the new look is terrible.

Note: This comment was created from a merged conversation originally titled new look

1 Message

 • 

62 Points

3 years ago

Damn this new design is horrible.  It's just plain hard to use. 

The images in the list of projects are too small to be truly useful and destroy the readability.

Why do I have to click "view all" when I probably wanted to view them all to begin with?

Did you increase the size of the photos?  (Hint: People do not go to a movie database to view pictures, I go there for data).

"Known for..."?  Yes.... there's a list of credits below that which gives EVERYTHING they did.

What were you thinking?

12 Messages

 • 

190 Points

3 years ago

New version is HORRIBLE for printing name pages!!!!!! It almost triples the amount of pages, ex. a name page that would normally be printing at 5 pages is now showing printing at 15 pages because it expands the images and video thumbnails aggressively...at $.10 a page, $.50 to $1.50 is excessive!!!!!!

 

Too bad on not having the option to switch back to the previous version, I do recall back in the day users were able to view different versions, I guess out with the old and in the new, as they say, phooy!

 

Please make the previous version also available, as performer pages are needed for printing for CDs (casting directors) and producers, etc!

Note: This comment was created from a merged conversation originally titled New Version

Employee

 • 

8.2K Messages

 • 

190.3K Points

@bounce_out​ You might find our update from Wednesday helpful, particularly the point around the “All credits” view -> https://community-imdb.sprinklr.com/conversations/imdbcom/imdb-name-page-redesign/6351563ae7100d725d54c0bb?commentId=63878b2b038ef261b8f4b7fb

1 Message

 • 

62 Points

3 years ago

I think it would look better with a few tweaks. 

- Leave off the pictures, it makes it look too noisy.

-Change the Titles to blue instead of black.

-Put "TV Series" behind the title instead of on a new line- maybe in parentheses.

-Expand the listing by showing the episodes and making them links.  That will save a click and a popup.

A good layout example of this would be something like this.

https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0687189/fullcredits?ref_=nm_flmg_sort_text_view

Honestly, my eye can skim the old style a lot faster than the new "modern, clean presentation of information which works for casual users", as you call it.

Just my two cents. 

T.

2 Messages

 • 

70 Points

3 years ago

I’m a longtime IMDb user. Only now just made an account to make this comment. This new redesign is terribly structured, visually it’s confusing and makes a once simple to navigate website visually incoherent. The first thought to enter my mind was “how and where is the info I’m looking for?” Many apps and websites change over the years and make horrible updates that ruin a fine thing. Please, reconsider your update, there was no need for this. 

10.7K Messages

 • 

226.1K Points

Hi, Woods. Your feedback is appreciated. Did you ever find what you were looking for?

16 Messages

 • 

358 Points

3 years ago

Before your 'upgrade' where actors & actress were not jumbled up. I use imdb to search for actors & actresses by name & put them in my spreadsheet. Simple is better always.

. I don't like the way somebody changed the layout.

Note: This comment was created from a merged conversation originally titled How do I go back to what imdb used to be?

10.7K Messages

 • 

226.1K Points

But notice how the look of IMDb name pages is analogous to the look of IMDb title pages? (That is, sans application of title reference view.)

8 Messages

 • 

166 Points

3 years ago

 Is anyone from IMDb web design reading these posts?

The consensus is that we DO NOT LIKE the new format and

we want an option out!

Thanks

Employee

 • 

8.2K Messages

 • 

190.3K Points

@rhgrafix​ 

Is anyone from IMDb web design reading these posts?

Yes, the team is reading, and there are many replies (mostly from me) across the thread. You might find our update from Wednesday helpful, particularly the point around the “All credits” view -> https://community-imdb.sprinklr.com/conversations/imdbcom/imdb-name-page-redesign/6351563ae7100d725d54c0bb?commentId=63878b2b038ef261b8f4b7fb

1 Message

 • 

66 Points

3 years ago

Thank you for more than 20 years, apparently you only understand the value of something when you lose it :(

Suggestions:

1. Please open the old and the new design as options for a while at the same time and then see from the statistics which one is used more. This would solve the previously commented problem of only a couple of hundred complains and hundreds of millions of users are happy. 

2.  Or open the old IMBD for paying customers. That could make some money for you. 

2 Messages

 • 

92 Points

3 years ago

As others have noted, the redesign is a catastrophic mess. If your goal was to get me to create an IMDB account (and thereby get my email address) in order to complain about this laughably bad redesign, then job well done. Who decided that breaking out credits into past and upcoming was preferable to a simple, easy to read list of all credits? It takes more clicks to get the information than it did before. There are redesigns that are frustrating at first and take time to get used to and then there is this. This is bad. Someone needs to take a step back, acknowledge the valid criticism the redesign is getting, swallow their pride and admit this redesign was perhaps change for the sake of change or someone trying to justify their job at IMDB. 

10.7K Messages

 • 

226.1K Points

Well, the underlying JavaScript bloat that is shared in common by name pages, title pages (title default view) and the home page is vastly worse than designs themselves. I get the feeling that the developers aren't going incorporate any performance upgrades before it comes time to retire the last generation platform (as seen in title reference view, "all credits" view, filmosearch and various subpath pages to title/name pages) entirely, so invariably the actual catastrophic mess will be realized at that point. Maybe those of us concerned about this ought to request that there simply exist a "no JS" rendition of IMDb?

3 Messages

 • 

80 Points

3 years ago

I'm sorry to say that I'm not a fan of the newly-designed "Names" pages.  The new design seems far more complicated to use than the previous design--just not as user-friendly.  I hope you will consider going back to the old design--which I have enjoyed, very much, for years..

1 Message

 • 

60 Points

3 years ago

The new design is a nightmare ! I want the normal view back ! nothing is good on the new version ! I want the 90's look !!!

1 Message

 • 

62 Points

3 years ago

Dear IMDB Team, 

Please revert to the old format. The new one is very cluttered and without any charm whatsoever. 

How can you be like this? It used to be such a nice website and now it's very unwieldy.