
Employee
•
3.6K Messages
•
38.2K Points
IMDb Name Page Redesign

We are excited to announce the launch of IMDb’s redesigned Name pages! These pages are meant to make your IMDb experience easier and more enjoyable by providing better access to photos and videos, an upgraded view of an individual’s credits, and improved mobile navigation making it easier to view IMDb features on the go. These enhancements reflect changes suggested by IMDb customers, as well as our own in-depth research designed to enhance entertainment content, discovery, and navigation. More information is available in the FAQ on the help page.
We hope you enjoy these latest improvements, and thank you for continuing to make IMDb the world’s most trusted source for movie, TV, and entertainment content.
— The IMDb Team
English | Français | Deutsch | हिन्दी | Italiano | Português | Español
JPA
2 Messages
•
70 Points
1 year ago
Hmm, the new design is ugly and confusing. Never change a winning team - bad decision you made. I bet you spent a lot money for this! I think everyone wants to have back the old design/layout.
1
mark_moore
10 Messages
•
172 Points
1 year ago
The redesign is awful mainly because everything is bundled together. Please keep TV, movies, shorts, documentaries, etc separate. Perhaps an option to merge them would be welcome but it's now a joyless task looking up movies that someone has been in. What a useless idea to come up with.
10
BIGZ
12 Messages
•
344 Points
1 year ago
REVERT IT BACK This is the worst change IMDB has ever introduced, it's more complicated and confusing to navigate, you seriously need to listen to our views. Clearly no-one here even likes it. IMDB has gone downhill from this to slow contribution and stupid declined stuff not happy
1
mark_moore
10 Messages
•
172 Points
1 year ago
I checked my imdb page and all the info of the documentaries I have been in has disappeared. Is this a temporary glitch or will it be fixed? I assume this is happening to many pages and not just mine.
3
Col_Needham
Employee
•
6.3K Messages
•
167K Points
1 year ago
A quick general update not in response to any specific new feedback. First, thanks for all of the continuing feedback which is being read and weighed by the IMDb team. A reminder as described elsewhere in the thread that as with all redesigns, we expect the vast majority of feedback here to be negative since the people enjoying the changes have little motivation to comment. On the other hand: please be aware that the design was built in many rounds of consultation with multiple IMDb customer groups; we held an opt-in beta across the summer open to all customers and around one million people tried the design, resulting in complaints from less than one hundred of those one million; we have made changes to the design based on feedback in that beta; the updated design has been available for over a month and has been used by more than one hundred million customers, resulting in even a smaller percentage of complaints (again less than one hundred people). We appreciate that all change is hard, but we encourage you to give yourself time to adjust to the expanded features of the new pages.
The new name pages work across all device sizes; they are available in eight additional languages beyond English; they improve consistency with the rest of the site & our mobile apps; and they comply with the latest accessibility standards. All this is to enable IMDb to better scale and grow our audience into the future. The full launch will enable a further enhancement in terms of even faster page loading speeds once we are able to activate client-side rendering. We also have other enhancements in the pipeline which are now easier thanks to the new technology.
A reminder to read the FAQ at https://help.imdb.com/article/issues/GMWASETVPLJYXEZE/ and do take the time to explore the significantly more powerful options available to sort and filter credits. In particular, see the "All topics" menu in the upper right of the page and the blue filter symbol under the "Credits" heading. All of the old features / sorts / links / subpages are still available.
For those people seeking a quick route to view all credits in the older IMDb design, we have renamed "Text view" to "All credits" for clarity in the "All topics" menu as shown here (see red highlight to activate the menu and yellow highlight to access the all credits link):
The equivalent "Text view of credits" label in the filter menu will be similarly updated soon.
For much more detail on how and why the pages were updated, please see our replies across the eight pages of this thread; employee replies such as this one are tagged with a green badge and "Employee" under the name of the name of the person posting.
Hope this helps.
21
rhgrafix
8 Messages
•
166 Points
1 year ago
Please make an option to remain on the old format, it's way better.
2
urbanopolis
2 Messages
•
70 Points
1 year ago
Note: Please fire your designer, this new version blows. Straight out of 2005. Blinding white space amount, tiny text, impossible to casually navigate, no dark mode., and on and on.
Face it , it's terrible. I am sure IMDB arrogance won't change what they worked "so hard" on.
I'm out
0
pexu
3 Messages
•
350 Points
1 year ago
The funny part is that this is being sold as a slick and fast version while in fact each page load requires almost twice the bandwidth what it was with the good and tried reference view (it hasn't been a featherlight champion either for a long time, that must be said). Perhaps even funnier is that on a site, which is dedicated to moving pictures, of that transferred data only 30% is visual content.
While the above is just nitpicking, forcefully sticking to a single design, truth if you will, seems rather odd. People have different preferences, and so have had applications for many decades. Just because there are multiple options, or even themes, doesn't mean that the brand would be lost behind countless menus and selections.
I guess this is what this is all about. Users do not bring in the money, advertisers do. Having a compact text view automatically is good for the user but bad for the business. The world has very quickly shifted to service and subscription based model. I wonder when the next "design refresh" comes if there is even a non-subscription option left.
It has been a good 20 years with IMDb so far, but eventually everything good must come to an end I'm afraid. Not that previously all was better. Using a typical connection way back then it would have taken several minutes just to load the "new refreshed look".
0
urbanopolis
2 Messages
•
70 Points
1 year ago
Dear IMDB, 2003 called and they want their designer back. This new option blows.. Blinding amount of white space, impossible to casually navigate. tiny text, no dark mode, and on, and on.
We know you won't change it because you already wasted truck loads of money on it. but
really though, have a good look, it's bad.
0
jaimevermeulen
10 Messages
•
220 Points
1 year ago
how can i go back to the old layout view which was alot better for older people
1
gkoeppen
3 Messages
•
92 Points
1 year ago
This format SUCKS. How can I go back to the original format.
0
EricKapenstein
2 Messages
•
70 Points
1 year ago
Literally unusable. I'm flabbergasted by the utter incompetence of this latest redesign. Please, dear God, go back and FIRE whoever did this.
0
Kid_Shelleen
2 Messages
•
72 Points
1 year ago
I prefer the old format. This one seems awkward and difficult to navigate.
1
tombrennan_ymail
7 Messages
•
150 Points
1 year ago
Since (at least for me) all the other pages I regularly view have remained in the old style, when can I expect those to take on the new format and make me even more upset when using this great web site?
0
plur62
216 Messages
•
5.1K Points
1 year ago
I prefer phone version of View all credits, it's perfect (just like before):
5