Maxence_G's profile

4.5K Messages

 • 

71.8K Points

Tuesday, January 25th, 2022

No Status

0

Poll Suggestion: Slow Cinema

Which films tagged as "slow cinema" on IMDb is your favorite?

Note: The author took the liberty to exclude films that were unproperly labelled "slow cinema".

List: https://www.imdb.com/list/ls536841851/

I excluded Summer with Monika, Smiles of a Summer Night, Wild Strawberries and Hour of the Wolf. I have seen these four Bergman films and clearly the person who labeled them "slow cinema" hasn't.

Oldest First
Selected Oldest First

5.2K Messages

 • 

138.4K Points

4 years ago

Wow, the list really made me boil inside. Basically, according to the "tagger", Ingmar Bergman is a slow director. What a cliché!

Anyone who's watched Bergman's films will observe that they're far from the "arthouse-introspective-clinical-black-and-white film for pseudo-intellectuals" and the cliché mostly comes from some iconic scenes in his filmography.

For me, a slow film is a film that does take the patience of the viewer for granted, spends an eternity (and a day) to show something that could be wrapped up in five minutes, and where the plot takes forever to take off (if there ever is a plot). Now, I've seen these films, first, most of them are below the 100 minute mark, and just because the directing seems rather patient and meticulous or if some parts are too dialogue-driven that doesn't mean it's slow. Boring, maybe... but slow?

I would put "The Tree of Life" on the top of my list, or "Benjamin Button" (a nearly 3-hour adaptation of a short story), "Syriana" (a film I couldn't finish) "Paris, Texas", "Wings of Desire"... I'm even surprised "2001" isn't on the list... I would even concede that one of my all-time favorite movies "Once Upon a Time in America" has its slow moments.

Anyway, it was a good call for "Uncle Boommee" that's true Golden Palm movie winners can sometimes be very... special)

4.5K Messages

 • 

71.8K Points

@ElMaruecan82​ 

Wow, the list really made me boil inside. Basically, according to the "tagger", Ingmar Bergman is a slow director. What a cliché!

I used the tag to be objective, but I couldn't there were some films on the list that just didn't belong here. In my opinion, without knowing anything about them, someone just added everything made by Bergman, Antonioni, Tarkovsky, Tarr, Angelopoulos and Kiarostami.

I haven't seen The Seventh Seal, Persona, Cries and Whispers, Autumn Sonata, The Virgin Spring, Through a Glass Darkly, Winter Sleep, Silence and Fanny and Alexander so it felt wrong to remove them. From Bergman the only film I saw but didn't remove was Skammen (1968). Other films I watched but didn't remove were Andrei Rublev, La notte, L'avventura and Roma.

I must say I disagree with your definition of "slow cinema", though. Slow cinema isn't inherently pretentious and pointless like you seem to suggest. As I define it, "slow" is actually a quality, not a synonym of "drag". If I made the list myself, I would include The Tree of Life (a masterpiece) , Paris, Texas (another masterpiece) , but not Benjamin Button nor Once Upon a Time in America (I haven't seen Wings of Desire.)

(edited)

5.2K Messages

 • 

138.4K Points

Thanks for your reply, but just one small clarification: I didn't and I would never associate "slow cinema" with pretentious film-making, while many "arthouse" films happen to be slow, as a matter of fact, many movies I found pretentious were the antithesis of slowness (some Godard, Gilliam and Fellini films notably).

My definition of slowness is on a pure narrative level and it's got nothing to do with length, I've always loved Ebert's statement about a good movie never being too long and a bad one, never too short. I abide by that definition. Now it's possible that I unconsciously associate the lack of a proper plot with slowness but I guess it all depends on my initial expectations, I don't know...

I guess I just didn't like the way the author threw every known Bergman's film... he lost credibility when he (or she) put "Cries and Whispers", if there's one Bergman's film that is NOT slow, it's this one :)

Champion

 • 

15.7K Messages

 • 

344.4K Points

4 years ago

It's a bit contradictory to use the keyword as the only source while saying that it isn't accurate. Maybe there are better sources?

4.5K Messages

 • 

71.8K Points

@Peter_pbn​ 

I guess: https://www.bfi.org.uk/lists/10-great-slow-films is a possibility, but without the popular arthouse filmmakers such as Tarkovsky, Bergman and Antonioni, it would considerably reduce the popularity of the poll. I'm gonna try to find a better option.

(edited)