keyword_expert's profile

2.7K Messages

 • 

47K Points

Wednesday, December 28th, 2022 9:00 PM

No Status

15

Add the ability for contributors to cancel their pending contributions

Proposal: IMDb should add the ability for contributors to cancel their pending contributions. 

We've all been here before: just minutes after submitting a data contribution to IMDb, we realize that our contribution was in error. Yet the erroneous contribution may remain pending multiple days before it is acted upon. Only then can we try to reverse it.

Other times, we realize that we could have worded that plot summary or trivia item a little better, even if it is not exactly erroneous. Yet there is nothing we can do to clean it up while it is pending. In fact, if we try to submit an additional edit while the first edit is pending, that often "locks" the particular data item from any further editing. 

All of this seems like a lot of wasted time and effort (including on the part of IMDb staff), especially when we realize while the contribution is still pending that it's erroneous.

The problem could be solved by allowing contributors to cancel pending contributions.

This topic has frequently come up on this forum, usually posed as a question of how to cancel pending contributions, and at least twice posed as proposals to allow editing and/or deletion of pending contributions.

Help article: 

I made a mistake with a submission. How can I correct it before it goes live?

I made a mistake with a submission. How can I correct it before it goes live?
You won't be able to correct the error directly. However, you can send a new submission with the correct information. You may need to wait for the information to go live and submit a correction or deletion and tick the "provide an explanation to assist in processing this change" option to add a note for our data editors.

Other Idea Posts:

How about the ability to delete or edit a pending review or review edit?  (by @jonny_vee)

Contribution mistakes  (by @ugnieska)

Need to be able to delete pending contribuition that is wrong.  (by @r_dunn)

Example Threads:

Cancel Pending Contribution

cancel pending contrabution

How do I cancel a pending submission?

I have a pending contribution that is wrong. How do I to delete it?

How to delete something's that's pending approval.

How do I cancel a contribution?

Cancel New Title Contribution

Please decline the pending changes on the following!

Retracting an imdb correction

Please Cancel Contribution

Cancel contribution submissions

I made a mistake in my credit submission, how can I cancel or correct it? 

How do I cancel a submission before it is approved?

How do I cancel a submission before it is approved? [part 2]

Cancel submission

cancel submitted update

Request to cancel a submission

Mistake with a title correction to the wrong film

I make a mistake submitting a new title - I need to be fix

IMDb staff: Please approve this correction to a movie credit

Help delete pending submission

Delete pending review.

Change pending bio

Please, delete submissions without processing them

Champion

 • 

3K Messages

 • 

72.5K Points

2 years ago

How would this work for top contributors whose submissions are accepted within minutes? It seems like it would create a whole lot of conflicts.

Also, how often does one need to cancel a submission? I've made a few. It seems easier to wait until they are accepted and revert them manually.

10.7K Messages

 • 

225.4K Points

Maybe only items pending approval would be eligible for cancellation? Maybe newly approved items would be automatically reverted to their previous conditions if cancellation is invoked a few seconds after they go live? Conflicts? I'm not sure what conflicts there could be apart from things known as race conditions.

2.7K Messages

 • 

47K Points

@adrian

How would this work for top contributors whose submissions are accepted within minutes?

The cancellation option would be available only while the contribution is pending (regardless of how long it is pending). But once a contribution is approved, it will show up as as approved and the option to cancel it will no longer be available. 

As for contributions being approved within minutes, it depends on what type of contribution. For example, for Top Contributors, keyword contributions are (usually) approved within a few minutes, while more complex and serious edits, like name mergers, title mergers, birth and death info, edits to title release dates, edits to existing plot summaries, etc. typically take several days to approve, even for Top Contributors. And those are the types of edits that I have in mind with this proposal, since those are the ones that can lead to the biggest problems if/when they approved. At the top of this post I have linked to a bunch of threads where people have encountered these types of problems.

It seems like it would create a whole lot of conflicts.

Can you elaborate on what you mean by that? 

The idea is the exact opposite--to allow contributors to prevent conflicts that they belatedly realize might happen if their pending contribution is approved. If contributors are allowed to cancel their own edit (before it is approved) and then start over, how would that result in a conflict?

Also, sometimes when an erroneous contribution is denied by IMDb, that can make it that much harder for the same contributor to make the correct edit the next time around. Denied contributions seem to trigger an alert that can block further editing, especially by the same contributor. Allowing contributors to cancel their own erroneous contributions will prevent these scenarios as well. 

Other scenarios involve series of contributions that should be approved in multiple steps, and the contributor realizes belatedly that they submitted them in the wrong order, or they accidentally submit multiple steps before the first step is approved. Examples can include name mergers where the acting credits (character names and attributes) also need to be corrected.

I recently had something similar happen to me, and even though I saw it coming, there was nothing I could do to stop it. It's like watching a car wreck in slow motion that you caused and you can do nothing but watch it unfold, and even then you can't fix it.

Still other examples can be where two related edits are submitted to different parts of the same data (e.g. one contribution would change a release date for a movie while the other would change the type of theaters where that release occurred, such as nationwide theaters or a limited release). The system may detect these as duplicate submissions and deny them, and then also block any further edits involving the same data. 

Also, how often does one need to cancel a submission? I've made a few.

I suppose it varies based on the contributor. It has happened to me at least a few times as well. 

It seems easier to wait until they are accepted and revert them manually.

But sometimes that is not possible, as I've tried to explain with examples. And in still other cases, staff will presume that a contribution is valid, so when the same contributor wants to then reverse the same contribution after it has been approved, that may not always be allowed. Here is a recent example of that, in which an IMDb staff member expressly said in pertinent part "[a]n attempt to delete information that was originally added by the same person is always regarded with some skepticism." 

Also, why put IMDb staff through the time and trouble of reviewing a contribution even after you realize that the contribution is in error? The idea behind this proposal is to save that time and trouble for everyone involved, contributors and IMDb staff alike.

(edited)

2.7K Messages

 • 

47K Points

@jeorj_euler​ 

Maybe only items pending approval would be eligible for cancellation?

Yes, that is exactly what I had in mind. I provided more detail in my response to @adrian

Conflicts? I'm not sure what conflicts there could be

I agree that there would be no conflicts if a contributor is allowed to cancel a pending contribution. In fact, this proposal is designed to prevent conflicts. Again, more details and examples are included in my response to @adrian

2.7K Messages

 • 

47K Points

@adrian​ 

Here is another example, also involving release attributes, where an edit that attempted to correct release information was flagged as a duplicate and denied, and at that point the Top Contributor had no recourse other than publicizing the issue in this forum.

Although this example didn't involve a situation where anyone wanted to cancel a pending contribution, it is an example of what can happen from bad data. If a contributor realizes their data is bad while the data is pending, they should be allowed to cancel the contribution before it is approved. Otherwise, we will end up with conflicts like described in this thread.

Thread by @stefano_stefano:

The Italian tile for a film is wrong/made-up and IMDb refuses to fix it. Top contributor 2017-2022 getting sick of IMDb.

2.7K Messages

 • 

47K Points

@adrian​ 

I thought of yet another example: 

A few times I have accidentally submitted the same (or a similar) contribution twice before either contribution is acted upon. Only after the second contribution did I realize my mistake. In these circumstances I would like to cancel one of the contributions while they are pending, since I know that the system may auto-detect the contributions as duplicates and might "protect" the data from any further editing. Yet there is no way to do this. 

10.7K Messages

 • 

225.4K Points

I just thought of one hypothetical scenario that might constitute a conflict, and that would be when the IMDb data editors opt not to cancel a contribution understood to be accurate, non-duplicated and very much belonging in whichever part of the website it would go live. Maybe something like that wouldn't be hard to mitigate, though. Perhaps the system would quickly purge the record of the cancelled submission. I admit that I maybe don't understand part of what adrian expressed as a concern about the hypothetical implementation of the feature request. A conflict could be any one of or a collection of many things, e.g. contradiction or paradox.

2.7K Messages

 • 

47K Points

@jeorj_euler​ Can you illustrate this hypothetical conflict with some concrete examples? Because I'm still not seeing it. 

10.7K Messages

 • 

225.4K Points

I don't know! Well, I don't honestly see how an actual paradox could emerge. Maybe a conflict on IMDb is merely an editorial disagreement. So, a man managing his wife's public image, and she is standing over his shoulder becoming angry over the information he just submitted, something like an alias-related filmography item relocation (or something similar) that nobody else bothered to sort out for the past twenty years. He tells her that she shouldn't worry, that he can fix it, if he acts "quickly enough," so he pursues a cancellation, but an IMDb data editor sees that the information accurate, non-duplicated and very much belonging, therefore blocks the cancellation. I already suggested that such a scenario could be easily mitigated against. An interesting thing to note is that the situation is probably not all that different from what happens in the absence of a submission cancellation feature. Observe please how many times people have come to the forum to request deletion of content that is understood to be public information by IMDb standards. So, to clarify, I was mainly speculating as to the meaning of "conflict" in that earlier post by me. Back to the paradox thing, I should imagine that software can be designed in such a way that it doesn't behave in a dissonant or contradictory manner, yet sometimes software developers take years to eliminate a problem, even if it manifests as a bug.

2.7K Messages

 • 

47K Points

@jeorj_euler​ 

 so he pursues a cancellation, but an IMDb data editor sees that the information accurate, non-duplicated and very much belonging, therefore blocks the cancellation.

But I don't think it would work that way. If cancellations are allowed, then once a contribution is cancelled while pending it will be taken out of the queue and no IMDb data editor would ever see it.

The only possible "conflict" I can even think of would be if a specific contribution pops up in the queue for an IMDb data editor, and while the editor is reviewing and researching that contribution, the contributor cancels it during that exact brief window of time. Maybe that is what @adrian was referring to by mentioning "a whole lot of conflicts."

If that is what @adrian meant, this can be avoided too. Basically, make it where a pending contribution can only be pending in one place at a time, and it can only be cancelled while it is still in the queue.

So to summarize, a contributor would be able to cancel while the contribution is still in the queue and not yet approved (including both automatic approval and manual approval), but once it leaves the queue and is under review by IMDb (either by staff or by the review algorithm), then it can no longer be cancelled. 

Seems pretty straightforward to me. I invite @adrian to provide any concrete examples of where or how this might not work.

(edited)

2.7K Messages

 • 

47K Points

2 years ago

@jimntempe

Thank you for voting for us having this option. I had to thank you here, since your other thread has been closed.

18 Messages

 • 

376 Points

2 years ago

Yes, please. Very straightforward. All items in "pending" que should be delete-able.  

Once they are "in review" or "approved" they are untouchable.

Only new submissions to correct items allowed at that point. Simple logic. So much time saved.

51 Messages

 • 

782 Points

11 months ago

Any updates on this very interesting proposal? Happy New Year to everyone.

1 Message

 • 

64 Points

2 months ago

Would be an useful feature