Data Issues & Policy Discussions

There is a credit for the role of Chuck in The Beatniks for a certain Bob Wells, and it appears on the IMDB page for Bob Wells (https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0920119/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_3_tt_0_nm_8_in_0_q_Bob%2520Wells) but they're not the same person.

Based on this thread (https://community-imdb.sprinklr.com/conversations/data-issues-policy-discussions/photo-manipulationadding-stuff-to-photos/6810123a244f5d4b8ed6cf86) I thought photo manipulation is NOT allowed. Therefore I tried to delete this picture: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt9051908/mediav

Hello,I looked at our IMDb rating on our show yesterday and it was sitting at 9 stars +. Since then, it looks like we've had more positive 9-10 star reviews on our page, though overnight, the average dropped down to 5.7. Though the actual average is 8.2. Is someone from IMDb able to take a look at t

I have tried 3X to send to IMDB a correction to please delete a credit that was not mine posted on my website.It says in the automated response that they cannot delete this short film credit.Here is what they are saying: "Your contribution has been declined.We have been unable to verify your contrib

Hello, I am trying to summit a new title with all the necessary informations about the short feature; La paire de manches. How to summit this new title? Where is the Botton?

Of, sweet Swan Lake!251106-013124-754000Track Contribution2025-11-06 01:31:24 Tchaikovsky (1970)Keywords - 17 items addedGenres - 2 items addedTrivia - 2 items added

I'm a bit confused by the result on an image I submitted. It shows Approved and then Declined. Looks like the image was added, but the names of the two actresses were declined? The submission ID is #251104-171717-370202. Before I try to just add the names, was hoping for clarification.

Her obituary in The Telegraph https://www.telegraph.co.uk/obituaries/2025/11/06/pauline-collins-shirley-valentine-greece-upstairs-downstair/, which I cited in my submission 251107-094738-040000, says 6 November. https://i.postimg.cc/XvwsKcWX/Image1.png is a screenshot before the paywall kicks in. He

It was rejected even though I set forth why there is an uncut home video version. It's because of a more lenient certification board named SPIO-JK. Here's a link to the uncut Bluray edition:https://amzn.eu/d/hhTveAOYou can see the SPIO-JK seal at the bottom corner of the cover.

I’m trying to submit this accurate statement into the profanity section of a movie; but it keeps declining because of it being against guidelines. How on earth is this against it cause I’ve seen far worse ones“There is at least 327 uses of "f**k" and its derivatives.”