Employee
•
17.5K Messages
•
313.1K Points
IMDb Web Name and Title Subpages Redesign
We are excited to announce IMDb’s redesign of Name and Title subpages! In the coming days, IMDb will incrementally roll out its 9 redesigned subpages. We redesigned 8 Name subpages, which include a name’s subpage for bio, news, awards, and more. You will also notice a redesigned title awards subpage. The refreshed pages are meant to make your IMDb experience easier and more enjoyable by providing improved access to celebrity, movie, and TV content on any device and when on the go. The redesign follows ongoing site improvements and reflects changes suggested by IMDb customers, as well as our own in-depth research designed to enhance entertainment content, discovery, and navigation.
In the coming months, we will continue to update IMDb pages throughout the site. We hope you enjoy these latest and upcoming improvements, and thank you for continuing to make IMDb the world’s most trusted source for movie, TV, and entertainment content.
— The IMDb Team
Name Awards Subpage Name Bio Subpage
ACT_1
8.5K Messages
•
176.1K Points
2 years ago
@Michelle 😀
See the New look later ??
Ana de Armas
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm1869101/
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm1869101/bio/
March 14 2023
Wayback Machine
http://web.archive.org/web/20230314093508/https://www.imdb.com/name/nm1869101/bio/
EDIT
.
(edited)
7
0
dave_6813614
14 Messages
•
446 Points
2 years ago
Why does the biography page looks so different? It sure isn't as useful/helpful as before!
0
justin_6415368
154 Messages
•
2.6K Points
2 years ago
I noticed that the IMDB once again updated their webpage. However, it used to show under "Relatives" what they were, ie: Siblings, grandchildren, cousins, etc. Now they no longer show that.
For example: Actress Drew Barrymore has multiple relatives in her bio at https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000106/bio who have their own webpages on the IMDB, but they no longer say what relation they are to her.
Is this something that will be fixed or is this permanent?
2
jakub_7542677
15 Messages
•
226 Points
2 years ago
Hi. What is going on with the list where you can see nominations/win by actors/movie etc. It it complete mess right now. Non alphabetical order and the look is terrible...is there some way how to switch it back to the previous version?
10
mbmb
1.7K Messages
•
22.9K Points
2 years ago
When there are multiple mini-bios, only one is listed on new pages, is this intentional?
1
Horst
423 Messages
•
14.4K Points
2 years ago
I cannot find it, but wish to share my thoughts :)
0
Horst
423 Messages
•
14.4K Points
2 years ago
The new awards view is a catastrophe honestly. I mean you could probably make a point for the new design if you tried really hard enough in terms of how it is structured, but the worst is what has been added very recently I think that you include the photos?? This is just awful, clogs it up so much.Or that you have to click en extra time to display all the Oscar wins for a film (Hurt Locker for example), that it is not sorted by winners first, then nominations etc. Oh and the photo aspect also makes no sense for Best Picture at the Oscars because it shows one name only. In the aforementioned example, it would be Bigelow, but there are three other winners. It is just another awful change in view/design for this page. Pity. Although I am not even sure why I say so. It's not like imdb staff has cared in recent years what the users posted here on this comment forum. The only effect it will probably have is that you are gonna post all the producer pictures and make things even worse xD
2
Peter_pbn
Champion
•
14.4K Messages
•
329.9K Points
2 years ago
What determines the order of awards within the same year of an event? It seems inconsistent.
Here for the Oscars, a supporting actress nomination is listed first. For the Baftas, a supporting actor nomination is listed first.
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt11813216/awards/
Here Best Picture and Best Film respectively are listed first:
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0887912/awards/
Here Best Picture is listed first, but Best Film at the Baftas seventh:
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0110912/awards/
As Horst said, categories won used to be listed first. If you are not able to consistently list the most important categories first, then listing wins first might be more consistent. When you are only displaying five awards by default, the ordering seems important.
1
Ashvin
51 Messages
•
880 Points
1 year ago
VERY NICE
0
0
TheTigerInMe1980
155 Messages
•
2K Points
1 year ago
Hi there.
I would like to leave a comment on the new award design. To put it nicely: it plain sucks. It gives me eyecancer; I don't even look up won/nominated awards anymore because of it bad looks. I definitely prefer the former version. So could you please change it back, or give me an option to change it back on my display?
2
Peter_pbn
Champion
•
14.4K Messages
•
329.9K Points
1 year ago
What is the order of events on the awards pages supposed to be at this point?
Much of it seems to be alphabetical, though Satellite Awards stick out. Towards the end the order seems to be more random.
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0991810/awards/
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt4975722/awards/
2
plur62
278 Messages
•
6K Points
1 year ago
When will the Awards page be displayed in alphabetical order again? Is this a bug or another in a series of "improvements"? Why are you doing this, what's the point of making things more messy? I'm really curious.
1
Robita007
2 Messages
•
70 Points
1 year ago
I think it's easier to find the Winner this way. what do you think?
(edited)
0
jakub_7542677
15 Messages
•
226 Points
10 months ago
And still no changes have been made. Can someone give us some update? Still no alphabetical order, winners not listed first etc. Thank you.
1