IMDb Redesigns Parents Guide

Hi

This will probably be the first of many messages, as I progress though my two main projects of finalizing My MPAA/MPA Catalog Number list and boxing up my library, for a hopeful move, due to finding that almost $500.00 worth of disk had disappeared from my library while I was in the hospital for an operation and the house I share with other relatives was fully occupied by them, who ever did it took the time to shift what they did not take to cover up the large gaps that would have contained my Dumbo, Dune, Toy Story and Tower of Terror titles. Of which 7 were Steel Case 4K/BR's. At the moment of 202409120951, Shark Tail does not have the Catalog Number (041134 End Credits). May I suggest that under or behind the "Motion Picture Rating (MPA) Rated" you could put the Catalog Number, or with the United States Ratings. I have come across that other countries appear to also have catalog numbers for videos made in their countries, which would make the Catalog Numbers more appropriate for being listed with each countries rating areas. At least in my opinion. Thank you for this attention, and action on this matter. Well, for now tell later, have fun, someone needs to. Han

@Dominic Hi, Yes Go onto the site for ANY physical page across IMDB where something has a tag denoting that something was ‘cut’ or passed in an, ‘edited version’ and this problem persists into all information throughout However I will link a few visual examples below such as: Infinity Pool (2023): Original Attribute: Canada: R (Alberta), Canada: 18A (Alberta) (edited version), Canada: R (British Columbia), Canada: 18A (British Columbia) (edited version) Now:

@Domanic Bigil (2019) Original: Singapore: PG13 (edited version) United Kingdom: 12A (cut) United Kingdom: 15 (uncut version) Now:

These are NOT isolated incidents, this is the case anywhere on site where something has previously been listed as cut or edited it is now noted as a ‘re-release’ which is inaccurate. In addition to this, previous display of information (via attributes) is also formatted in less clear and concise manner throughout too Another example, this was originally laid out in this (taken from the Inbetweeners Movie - 2011, problem applicable throughout the site / site-wide) format: Original display (as) Netherlands: 12 (original rating, withdrawn), Netherlands: 14 (2024, re-rating) Now:

Here are a few examples of a problem / issue persistent throughout the site. Hope this can be of help. - Joseph

Hi, thanks for providing me with examples, I now understand what you mean. I will raise this with the appropriate team and reply here when I have an answer.

We are tracking this in ticket ref #D170831924

@Dominic​ Hi thanks for your response and for fixing the issue with regard to cuts and edited versions (reflected through attributes), this issue has now been resolved although there are still some issues with formatting of re-ratings as I mentioned before

Some are in full upper-case display (for example this attribute taken from The Substance (2024) )

Others out of order with how they were added, for example before this - from Poor Things (2023) - which originally read as both ‘original rating, withdrawn’ […] and ‘2024, re-rating’ is now formatted like this:

All were formally lower case and formatted in a fashion which was clearer and more grammatically accurate (This therefore may also be something worth looking into, as with the previous one this is also an issue which persists, across all relevant IMDB pages on the site) All the best Joseph

Hi, thanks again for pointing this out. There were related issues here. From you previous explanation I understood the first but overlooked the second. I have raise this for the relevant team now. (Tracking #D178754419)

@Dominic Alright cool Thanks The capitalisation issue is now fixed, however attributes under the certification section are still misplaced (out of their original order), example - the original listing stated ‘original rating, cut’ or ‘original rating, withdrawn’ or likewise ‘1976, re-rating, uncut version’ / ‘1985, re-rating, uncut version’ (for example), are now listed like this (ie. out of order):

Examples taken from Scream VI (2023) & Rebel Without A Cause (1955), but applicable across IMDB. With this issue fixed all should be resolved, I’m sorry to keep bringing issues to your forefront but I thank you for your continued help, as a contributor it is much appreciated All the best Joseph