Bethanny's profile
Employee

Employee

 • 

5.6K Messages

 • 

58.9K Points

Thursday, October 20th, 2022

IMDb Name Page Redesign

IMDb Name Page Redesign

Image

 

We are excited to announce the launch of IMDb’s redesigned Name pages! These pages are meant to make your IMDb experience easier and more enjoyable by providing better access to photos and videos, an upgraded view of an individual’s credits, and improved mobile navigation making it easier to view IMDb features on the go. These enhancements reflect changes suggested by IMDb customers, as well as our own in-depth research designed to enhance entertainment content, discovery, and navigation. More information is available in the FAQ on the help page.

We hope you enjoy these latest improvements, and thank you for continuing to make IMDb the world’s most trusted source for movie, TV, and entertainment content.

— The IMDb Team

 

English | Français | Deutsch | हिन्दी | Italiano | Português | Español

Oldest First
Selected Oldest First

3 Messages

 • 

90 Points

3 years ago

Why ruin the good thing you used to have? The new format is terrible.

Note: This comment was created from a merged conversation originally titled new format

4 Messages

 • 

104 Points

3 years ago

I just created an account on this community site so I can tell you to give us an option for the old IMDB site because this one is horrible

Employee

 • 

8.2K Messages

 • 

190.3K Points

@zvona2222You might find our update from last week helpful, particularly the point around the “All credits” view -> https://community-imdb.sprinklr.com/conversations/imdbcom/imdb-name-page-redesign/6351563ae7100d725d54c0bb?commentId=63878b2b038ef261b8f4b7fb

4 Messages

 • 

104 Points

@Col_Needham​ Thanks but I'm discontented with the option to every time I visit IMDB have to click on All Topics>All Credits

So if you don't bring it back unfortunately I won't use IMDB anymore to check on actors and directors, I'll go now in pursuit of another site ( luckily if there is any other than this )

I commented on this with friends and most of them are dissatisfied

11 Messages

 • 

170 Points

3 years ago

Your new layout is shockingly bad.  Pages don't load, directors pages are missing and and keeps saying 'problem, try again later'

I need imdb for my job on a daily basis.  Sort this out by going back to the old one layout.  Truly awful.  

Note: This comment was created from a merged conversation originally titled Page layout

Employee

 • 

8.2K Messages

 • 

190.3K Points

@Rake1204​ 

Pages don't load, directors pages are missing and and keeps saying 'problem, try again later'

Sorry to hear this.  Please can you provide some examples of directors pages which you describe as “missing” and details of what you mean.  Also the same for pages which do not load?  

You might find our update from last week helpful, particularly the point around the “All credits” view -> https://community-imdb.sprinklr.com/conversations/imdbcom/imdb-name-page-redesign/6351563ae7100d725d54c0bb?commentId=63878b2b038ef261b8f4b7fb

11 Messages

 • 

170 Points

I'm sorry but the new layout is not good or interesting and frankly, awkward to navigate.  There was nothing wrong with the old version.  

For example...

10.7K Messages

 • 

226.1K Points

Discerning IMDb's last generation software platform from the IMDb's new software platform isn't too difficult. Thus far, any page besides a base IMDb name page, a base IMDb title page, the IMDb home page or certain IMDb search results pages is basically generated on the older system.

7 Messages

 • 

150 Points

@xianjiro​ Exactly.  I'd bet people who (like me), tried the beta, hated it, and went back to the option of the old page, never had a reason to complain until the change was forced upon them.  That means the communication back to the designers had a small percentage of heavy critics, if any.  So if that's the public group the designers used to assure approval, it wasn't a very good way of polling.  Hopefully they will read through some of the comments here and rethink.  Until then, when I look up a name and want to see if that name is in a specific movie or show, now I need to scroll down, find the "See all" button, click it, wait, and then do ctrl-F in chrome to find the show I'm interested in.  Instead of just ctrl-F.  Then if I want to see the episode details... oh, don't start me on that programming fiasco.  Sure, the new initial page load saves bandwidth because it doesn't load the entire list.  But the only reason bandwidth became a problem was because they added unneeded pictures to each line.  What is it about people who see a pretty interface saying, "I really like it", even when usability is compromised?

And please don't respond to this with the repeated, "All Credits" post.  It's not the same thing.  Not anywhere near the same thing.

2.7K Messages

 • 

47K Points

@xianjiro 

@martin_695862​ wrote: I am also concerned that IMDB may start to redesign the layout of all its other pages as time goes on - that this is only the beginning of further reduction in usability and naff layout that looks good on a mobile phone for casual browsing but which is dumbed-down, cut into bite-size chunks, and generally worsened as a serious research/contribution tool.

Yeah, this is kind of my fear going forward as well.

Unfortunately, this is not just a fear, but reality:

When will other pages switch to the new technology and new design?

Currently, home/where-to-watch/photos/videos/title are already modernized on IMDb. We plan to modernize subpages next and eventually the rest of the site.

Source: https://help.imdb.com/article/issues/GMWASETVPLJYXEZE

Discussion of the impending changes: https://twitter.com/skogesT/status/1598954885461921792

(edited)

10.7K Messages

 • 

226.1K Points

For the most part, public outcry is not really a thing in regards to website redesigns. A few times before on this thread, the YouTube redesign of autumn 2022 has been mentioned, and while hundreds of millions of people noticed the design, only something like several dozen people have taken a little bit of time to post public opinions about it. Reddit is probably the only website in recent history that had website maintainers respond in an acquiescing manner to visitors' complaints. (In other words, the old Reddit layout exists but it is hidden.) Granted, YouTube has always been very gradual about its redesign processes, casual visitors won't even notice changes. IMDb unfortunately has seen numerous jarring changes since 2017, but even so, the various features (apart from the site-native message boards) forgone had a very tiny fan base, which sort of implies underutilization anyway.

263 Messages

 • 

5.2K Points

@jeorj_euler​ as well as the massive loss of enjoyment of this site which the catastrophic removal of the message boards caused, I also miss "Where Are They Now?", alternative names, and character pages.

The character pages were a wonderful idea, being able to instantly look at somebody like Sherlock Holmes, and see all the people who had played him, photographs, quotes, and wiki bios.  Crazy that a movie site has no way to study characters actually.  Not to mention all the work which people put into them which was instantly lost.

Champion

 • 

5.1K Messages

 • 

118.7K Points

@Rake1204​ 

Using the collaboration search for titles, I infer that the page of your  snapshot is for

https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000759/

and I don't have a problem viewing his credits.

What OS/browser are you using?

Mine is Windows 11 and Chrome 108 or Firefox 107.

1 Message

 • 

60 Points

3 years ago

Why must everything be so slow? Every redesigned page is much slower than in old design… how many JavaScript libraries do you need to display a simple movie list? And I don't talk just about download speed, there is slow-down just after download, everything is sluggish. It could be done so much better… simpler and quicker.

10.7K Messages

 • 

226.1K Points

Might be interesting to check the total amount of bytes of data is downloaded just to properly display a page on the new software platform. It's sure to be way over half a megabyte, which doesn't seem like much, until things add up. Even with a fast connection, a fast GPU and lots of RAM, delays will emerge whenever any of these things are somehow (and for whatever reason) operating at nearly capacity. There is a thing called virtual RAM too, or swap, and it is slower than raw volatile RAM.

2 Messages

 • 

72 Points

3 years ago

The credits feature has been ruined by the redesign. The thumbnail images of movies add absolutely nothing and make referencing anyone with a long list of credits an unnecessarily time consuming task. The old format was far more user friendly.

Employee

 • 

8.2K Messages

 • 

190.3K Points

@Hangerz22You might find our update from last week helpful, particularly the point around the “All credits” view -> https://community-imdb.sprinklr.com/conversations/imdbcom/imdb-name-page-redesign/6351563ae7100d725d54c0bb?commentId=63878b2b038ef261b8f4b7fb

10.7K Messages

 • 

226.1K Points

3 years ago

Here is a screen cap of an example of what I see most of the time whenever I click the "all topics" button:

"We are unable to load this content at this time. Please refresh the page or try again later."

11 Messages

 • 

170 Points

@jeorj_euler​ 

Yes, it's useless.  

Employee

 • 

8.2K Messages

 • 

190.3K Points

@jeorj_euler​ Please follow the advice in https://help.imdb.com/article/imdb/general-information/why-is-imdb-displaying-differently-on-my-browser/GF2ZAR69V859XLHF as you appear to be the only person reporting this specific issue. If you can reproduce it with a clean, modern, supported browser and operating system, off VPN, and without plug-ins, please let us know (a) which browser / system configurations were still broken like this (b) the results of a speed test from fast.com or similar (c) in which country you are located.  Thanks. 

10.7K Messages

 • 

226.1K Points

Right, but that is no excuse for designing the "all topics" to be dependent upon AJAX/fetch, which creates somewhat of an obstacle to forcing it to load automatically as the page loads. The reason for having all these third party scripts (all of my own design) in the first place is because of the terrible aspects of the design (or broken things) that have existed since apparently 2010. The situation is even worse now, because the new design is made in such a way as to "resist", so to speak, these corrective scripts. Because IMDb only party-way through the software platform migration, I'm inclined to wait until it finished before reworking the scripts.

11 Messages

 • 

170 Points

@Col_Needham​ 

You've got to be joking.  I've just read dozens of others complaints on here!  It is still doing it, and I can't even see a person's history now at all.  

Why did you change something that worked fine before? I won't be using this anymore.  Truly hideous layout and even worse service.  

1 Message

 • 

60 Points

3 years ago

nobody needed this change, like the last not so long ago. what's worse, it's a bad change. everyone's here to tell you. you're literally wasting money paying people to do a job that's not needed, but nobody's good enough to tell your bosses.

2 Messages

 • 

84 Points

3 years ago

Option in settings to switch to old format please?

Sorry, but this "improvement" is just...not. It's clunky, unintuitive, and not at all user friendly. No one wants to read a whole other page on "how to use" your site. Formerly you could see everything at a glance, or with a bit of scrolling if the credits list was long. You even have to search for the bio link now.

1 Message

 • 

60 Points

3 years ago

In general, I like it. But it would be very useful to see in the Credits section the Top 3 genres of each item, its rating and my rating without a need to click every time on the Info button.

Employee

 • 

8.2K Messages

 • 

190.3K Points

@Jeksonic​ Thanks -- is this is a request to make the detailed pop-up automatically open upon mouse-over vs. a click?  

2 Messages

 • 

70 Points

3 years ago

Please can you help me. Since page redesign I can't expand credits menu in edge or chrome browsers in regular mode, just in private mode. 

Note: This comment was created from a merged conversation originally titled problem with expanding credits

Employee

 • 

8.2K Messages

 • 

190.3K Points

@janeveleski​ Please see https://help.imdb.com/article/imdb/general-information/why-is-imdb-displaying-differently-on-my-browser/GF2ZAR69V859XLHF ... it is likely a plug-in such as an ad-blocker is incorrectly blocking the page content.  Please let us know if this solves the problem. 

179 Messages

 • 

3K Points

3 years ago

I've noticed that with the new format, the IMDB will show the birth date of people, but will no longer show where they were born.  For example, Yolonda Ross at https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0743931 shows that she was born on August 4, 1968 and doesn't list the place of birth.  But in her biography section at https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0743931/bio it not only doesn't show that, it also doesn't show her place of birth which is Omaha, Nebraska.  I know it is still in the database because when I checked her DOB when I tried to edit, the information was there.

Was this an intentional change to no longer show the place of birth or is it an error?

Note: This comment was created from a merged conversation originally titled The places of birth are no longer showing up on IMDB biographies.

Employee

 • 

8.2K Messages

 • 

190.3K Points

@justin_6415368​ 

For example, Yolonda Ross at https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0743931 shows that she was born on August 4, 1968 and doesn't list the place of birth.

Places of birth (and death if applicable) are in the Personal Details section, further down the page:

Our testing showed it was better to keep the display of the dates more simple at the top of the page, plus there are other considerations in the placement.  The birth location can always be included in the mini-biography text where interesting, and all automatically generated biographies include it where known, as is also the case with Yolonda Ross: 

Hope this helps. 

2 Messages

 • 

70 Points

3 years ago

Hate the new format.  Can't find what I'm looking for.  Rapidly getting off of the imdb habit!  And also don't appreciate the difficulties thrown at me as I've tried to criticize the new format.  Don't blame you for making it difficult, though.  I imagine you're getting mostly bad reviews!

6 Messages

 • 

120 Points

3 years ago

Not a fan of the new web design, but there are plenty of threads about that.

What I don't understand is why "Self" credits remain second-class credits here. A person with 20 "Self" credits and one "thanks" credit has the "thanks" credit as the main entry on their page, with users needing to click the tiny "Self" button to see those credits.

Why doesn't the category with the most credits get treated as the default category for any given person?

Note: This comment was created from a merged conversation originally titled Why are "Self" credits still treated as the lowest of the low on IMDb?

6 Messages

 • 

120 Points

3 years ago

New web design is terrible. Credit lists should be visible by default, at least for the category or two with the most credits. The buttons for hidden credits are so small, it's easy to miss them.

3 Messages

 • 

90 Points

3 years ago

I want to see movies vs TV shows rather than everything in a row

Champion

 • 

5.1K Messages

 • 

118.7K Points

@SteveG​ 

You can do that now. Click the blue down-arrow for Filter options, which begin with an option to sort by Project Type.