nightvision25's profile

16 Messages

 • 

392 Points

Thursday, July 18th, 2013 1:35 AM

No Status

7

Separate background actors/extras from regular cast on movies

I find the addition of extras/background actors to IMDb increasingly distracting. During the production phase most of them do not even add an "uncredited" but try to sneak in as normal cast member, even though they know they will not get a credit - and while doing so totally clutter up the cast list, making it incredibly hard to figure out who is actually ~in~ the movie.

And when the cast list gets checked at release time, they get demoted to "uncredited" only but are still listed. This totally dilutes the "uncredited" attribution in my opinion, and still clutters up the cast listing with people who have about the same value as the set deco (and nobody lists the furniture on IMDb, right?). Not to talk about the fact, that there is not even any verification if that person a) has even worked as an extra on the movie and b) is shown (versus got cut during editing).

I'm absolutely certain, that there are several "actors" on IMDb whose filmography is entirely fictional. People who add themselves during production and then get either an "uncredited" credit in the end, or sometimes even a real credit (in cases where movies get released without any IMDb or producers staff checking cast/crew lists against actual credits like this happens often with small indies). I know I've seen a few in the past which I was sure were entirely fake, and I have not even been looking for them.

My request: please create a separate section or page for background/extras, so they don't get mixed up with real cast at least; I mean, right from the beginning so there is never any question if they are speaking cast or extras. It should also reduce the temptation to add fake credits and help IMDb staff to identify actors who try to cheat with their credits when those people add themselves to regular cast but repeatedly don't show up in the actual movie credits. It might even help with unknown/little known actors who are trying to boost their filmography that way in order to manipulate their starmeter. Or, update your policies to make clear that extras are not allowed be added and remove them during a credits update entirely (instead of just updating their listing to "uncredited" which happens without any verification if that person actually was in the movie). I would prefer the latter but if not possible I think it would be very helpful for everyone to put them at least separate from the cast to avoid confusion.

Thanks.

16 Messages

 • 

392 Points

11 years ago

Now that IMDbPro Labs has added a new sorting option for cast, I think this is even more important.

Have you tried sorting by name? The list is now a mixed collection of actual cast and tons of extras - and you can't immediately see that they are extras, esp in the time until a movie is officially released most extras don't even have that uncredited attribute.

I think the way IMDb allows the use of uncredited right now, is devaluating the database. In its own guidelines it says "A typical example is when a famous actor has an unbilled cameo appearance in a film." - that's the right use.

But not for every single extra, who may or may not be seen in the movie. The submission guidelines even say, "For cast/acting appearances, you must be identifiable and featured on-screen in the final released cut of the film. In other words, it's not enough to have worked on a production: your scenes must be included in the final cut and it must be possible to easily identify your appearance.." but they get ignored. For one, almost all extras submit their credit WITHOUT the uncredited attribute initially (just check studio movies in post-production.... 90%+ are listed as full cast members). But secondly, no one checks if they are actually in the movie (and the extras can't even know if they make the final cut when they submit their credit during production in most cases).

And because of the unheeding allowance of extras (and the lack of verification on all projects so uncredited roles slip through as credited), there are TONS of really dubious IMDb pages consisting only of extra work (some even credited because they slip through) and being audience member in talkshows.

In my opinion, IMDb really needs to so something about the misuse of credits for non-credited work, and separating the extras out from the cast into a dedicated section would be at least a small step forward.

Champion

 • 

14.5K Messages

 • 

330.9K Points

11 years ago

I think your criticisms are well stated and your suggestion interesting. I want to mention that extras have also in the past been accepted in the Other Crew section. I recently had problems adding extra credits in that section and asked about it at the Contributors Help board, and a staff member said they would have a discussion about their policies. I posted a link there to your post here.

16 Messages

 • 

392 Points

Thanks for that. Perhaps I should check out the Contributors Help board as well.

Champion

 • 

1.9K Messages

 • 

92.6K Points

11 years ago

What they really need to do at once is enforce the current regulations. One of these states that the Character Name should identify the particular artist. Names like 'Extra' are specifically excluded, but still show up on the pages.

Characters like 'Man in Bar' is hardly helpful if the scene involves a crowded bar, or if the film has four or five bar scenes with different actors in each one.

If IMDb made an explicit policy that Contributors should submit deletes for (uncredited) cast credits that cannot be easily identified I think the problem would be significantly reduced.

16 Messages

 • 

392 Points

I think strictly enforcing the existing policies would be a good way too. I just would love for IMDb do something because it is becoming a real mess imo. Most extras give themselves a descriptive credit and some even a character name but they are still extras without any credit and I just don't think this is what the 'uncredited' attribute is intended for.

My suggestion of moving them into a separate section was mostly an idea how to deal with them if you can't eliminate them (which would be better).

227 Messages

 • 

11.3K Points

11 years ago

I have found that irritating too and most of these end up being manipulators who add fake credits to MAJOR titles and until it can be verified (after the film releases), they remain in the lead cast role section for many months during the filming...and the longer they stay there, the better their starmeter rankings are..

sleepingbeauty , you hit the nail on the head..that is true..they do. IMDb has no way of policing these "con people"..the thing is, when you are able to get your starmeter that high, sometimes your name will appear ahead of the MAIN LEADS of the movie, it has happened many times. e.g, this guy (http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2252255/) , he is a NOBODY background extra but his starmeter is high due to manipulation which means he will appear in the top 3 section of a major title until the film is released and verified and credit order added...

most don't even add the "uncredited" tag because they are using that movie to get more roles in others as they want their casting director to find their names on IMDb under a big banner/budget movie.

4 Messages

 • 

312 Points

If you go to St Vincent de Van Nuys, here - http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2170593/?ref_=rvi_tt, Alyssa Ruland - Student, is credited WAY above the lead, Jaeden Lieberher (who was pushed to the second page), but she was only an extra coming out of the school.  Ditto for her "roles" in Spiderman and Royal Pains -- where she is listed as uncredited.  Still ... to have the poster for Spiderman under her "Known For" section is misleading.  She is know Known For anything!  This chick has even been on local TV masquerading as a "Hollywood Star" - and the news people, who are too lazy to drill into her actual work get an easy news story out it it.  It's very frustrating for real actors and IMDB should set a higher bar for getting into the cast list.   

Champion

 • 

1.9K Messages

 • 

146.1K Points

On that title, the order is incomplete - the first three people are given the order: 3, 6, 10. Then nothing. The fix is to go to that page, edit the cast and crew, then add the whole order in - this should then put everyone in their right place. It doesn't look like this is anything the actress did wrong, it is the mess left behind my incomplete credit adding.

Champion

 • 

1.9K Messages

 • 

146.1K Points

11 years ago

See this more recent discussion:

https://getsatisfaction.com/imdb/topi...

Champion

 • 

1.9K Messages

 • 

146.1K Points

11 years ago

Also Peter has linked over here, so it makes sense to link back:

http://www.imdb.com/board/bd0000042/n...

I'm juggling the same problem, but won't put the time in until this issue is resolved (and it might require a new thread here or there to deal with the specific issues):

http://www.imdb.com/board/bd0000042/n...

Champion

 • 

1.9K Messages

 • 

146.1K Points

And this has now been resolved:

Extras are now, and have always been, listed as cast. Any previous
advice that they should go anywhere else was wrong and we've not been
accepting them in "other crew" (though I suspect some have slipped
through).


http://www.imdb.com/board/bd0000042/nest/216327092?d=221816361#221816361

14 Messages

 • 

340 Points

6 years ago

On episodic TV listings, it makes NO SENSE to list hundreds of uncredited background artists above crew from producers down ! WHy do I have to scroll endlessly to find the people that way more meaningfully actually make the show. Can you just list the first 20 or so cast and then have a “more” button ?
Note: This comment was created from a merged conversation originally titled Title Pages: Why are background extras listed above the crew and producers ?

10.7K Messages

 • 

225.4K Points

Hi, john brawley. Do you use reference view?

14 Messages

 • 

340 Points

In reference view you don't get any crew.  Once you go to "full cast and crew" it's a thousand backgrounders before you get to producers and below the line listings..aka the crew.

10.7K Messages

 • 

225.4K Points

The problem is that, with the exception of a one-line listing of key writers and directors, the cast is always listed before the crew.

14 Messages

 • 

340 Points

Why would an UNCREDITED extra in a single episode be listed before the director of photography, editor or production designer of the entire series.  It makes no sense at all.  A quick solution would be a "more" button on the cast after the first 30 or 40 listed ? If you want to see the HUNDREDS of cast that are listed over the lifetime of a series then go to a seperate page.  How many page down's do you have to hit before you find the crew, many of whom have worked for hundreds of episodes in key creative roles ?...https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0413573/fullcredits?ref_=tt_rv

10.7K Messages

 • 

225.4K Points

Each section should at least have its own fragment identifier, and hyperlinks to them should be at the top of the page.

2.4K Messages

 • 

81.2K Points

Hi, john brawley, let me put it the way I understand your issue:

You are a subscribed contributor, and in your preferences (https://www.imdb.com/preferences/general), you have ticked "Show reference view...", therefore you get the full cast and crew on one page. The cast is always displayed first, hence you may have loads of uncredited actors before even reaching the director.

If you untick "Show reference view", (if I remember right) your default display will list only the top 20 (?) actors, with a "Show more" link before displaying the director.
Is the latter what you are after ?

14 Messages

 • 

340 Points

Hello Vincent.

Thanks for responding,

I did have that selected.  Even unselected though.... you still don't have the top 20 selected ONLY appearing.

The behaviour is the same.

If you want to look up who the the production designer of a popular show is, you still have to wade through pages of single episode uncredited extras that are listed before the creatives that are on the whole season.  Go look up the production designer of Madman and tell me how many clicks and scrolls it takes you.

Go look up who did the special make up effects in the series The Walking Dead and there's pages of uncredited single episode zombie backgrounders instead of the team that DID the zombie makeup.

JB

192 Messages

 • 

7.3K Points

It worked as Viincent said for me. Did you hit the SUBMIT button and then do a new search for your movie?

Champion

 • 

4K Messages

 • 

244.1K Points

Edwin, no offense, but that comment is a personal attack and is quite offensive. Things like that will eventually get you banned despite being a valauble contributor since 1999. 

Why, of places, hold a grudge and stalk someone here?.. (Edit: Although, yes, why hold grudge and stalk anywhere for that matter). 

10.7K Messages

 • 

225.4K Points

Nikolay Yeriomin, he probably doesn't have much to worry about (for a while) as long as he only has one target, especially since the target is neither an IMDb company officer nor a long-time, polite Contributor Helper.

Champion

 • 

14.5K Messages

 • 

330.9K Points

A default title or episode page doesn't have any crew listed apart from the director and writers, so the point still stands that you must scroll past the cast list to get to the producers, etc.

10.7K Messages

 • 

225.4K Points

The following is a bookmarklet (or script code prefixed with a out-syntax scheme identifier) which, when used on a "Full Cast & Crew" listing page, will skip-scroll past the entire the cast listing.
javascript:
(
function()
{
var e=document.querySelectorAll("h4.dataHeaderWithBorder"),i;
for(i=0;i<e.length;i++)
if(/^ *Series Produced by *$/i
.test(e[i].textContent
.replace(/[ \xa0\t\n]+/mg," ")))
e[i].scrollIntoView();
}
)
()
If you know what a bookmarklet is, then you already know what to do, otherwise to "install" the tool, you would highlight the aforementioned source code (a JavaScript URI), copy it (to the clipboard) and paste it into URL field of a browser bookmark, whether already existing or newly created.

To use a bookmarklet, you "visit" it while having the particular webpage (in all of the Web) as the active tab in your browser. You don't need to understand JavaScript or any scripting language to use a bookmarklet.

The properly-encoded URI for that same source code is javascript:(function()%7Bvar%20e=document.querySelectorAll(%22h4.dataHeaderWithBorder%22),i;for(i=0;i%3Ce.length;i++)if(/%5E%20*Series%20Produced%20by%20*$/i.test(e%5Bi%5D.textContent.replace(/%5B%20%5Cxa0%5Ct%5Cn%5D+/mg,%22%20%22)))e%5Bi%5D.scrollIntoView();%7D)(); by the way. I previously presented this with line breaks and indentation to make it easier to read and thereby easier to understand, which in turn helps a semi-experienced individual screen it for malicious script behavior and errors in the flow of control that could unintentionally cause problems with resource allocation on any computer on which it is executed, meaning that trusting me would not be requisite for understanding that the script is safe.

14 Messages

 • 

340 Points

HI Nick. It doens’t seem to make any difference if this is checked or not, and yes I’ve hit submit, even, logged out and back in again on a different browser.

JB

14 Messages

 • 

340 Points

But reference view doens’t give me any of the below the line heads of department ? No designer, no editor, no DP, no sound, no music no costume, no VFX no SFX etc....

10.7K Messages

 • 

225.4K Points

That's a good point, john brawley. If I recall correctly, when the old Title Combined View was ditched in favor new Title Reference View, that new reference view briefly contained the below-the-line heads of departments, but it also included the entirety of the cast from the whole series, which was causing the titles pages to take a long time to load in reference view.

10.7K Messages

 • 

225.4K Points

Notice how https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0413573/externalsites has a "Jump to" index. That's an example of an application of fragment identifier hyperlinks.

8 Messages

 • 

142 Points

This is still a continued problem.   I understand people wanting credit, but we use hundreds of BG in a film / TV Show or whatever.  If you speak you get a screen credit (if it's SAG, not always the same for Non-Union) and could be checked by the end credit's.  If it's a star actor doing a fun cameo and it can be confirmed then that is fun.   There needs to be a solution, with the problem being you can't certify a BG person.  They are BG, which makes them "Cast" but more part of the Crew.   But since again you can't confirm this, then they either shouldn't be allowed in the "Uncredited" or set up a Background Performer section.   It really has become a little silly.   I have even seen people at comic con who are BG performers with no screen credits or a ton of "Uncredited" setting up a place for autographs.   I have worked with some and know they are BG and not a speaking cast member.    Please find a solution... I know there is another thread only started 10 years ago... so I guess we will see.

3 Messages

 • 

80 Points

5 years ago

" try to sneak in as normal cast member, even though they know they will not get a credit - and while doing so totally clutter up the cast list, making it incredibly hard to figure out who is actually ~in~ the movie."  Normal cast? "Who was actually ~in~ the movie? If they are on screen, they are actually IN the movie. And background ARE normal cast. Try doing a movie without them. 

8 Messages

 • 

142 Points

1 year ago

This is still a continued problem.   I understand people wanting credit, but we use hundreds of BG in a film / TV Show or whatever.  If you speak you get a screen credit (if it's SAG, not always the same for Non-Union) and could be checked by the end credit's.  If it's a star actor doing a fun cameo and it can be confirmed then that is fun.   There needs to be a solution, with the problem being you can't certify a BG person.  They are BG, which makes them "Cast" but more part of the Crew.   But since again you can't confirm this, then they either shouldn't be allowed in the "Uncredited" or set up a Background Performer section.   It really has become a little silly.   I have even seen people at comic con who are BG performers with no screen credits or a ton of "Uncredited" setting up a place for autographs.   I have worked with some and know they are BG and not a speaking cast member.    Please find a solution... I know this thread only started 10 years ago... so I guess we will see.

8 Messages

 • 

142 Points

1 year ago

I'm not understanding this flood of "Uncredited" names coming up in the cast?   If you had a line or were a Stand-In, or stunts, dancer then you get a screen credit.  Its confirmable.  But I have been seeing tons of "Uncredited" that are Background Performers.   I know some as it's movies I have worked on and know they are not speaking rolls, or specialty, just someone who created a name like "Class Teacher" and put it up.  I'm not unsympathetic, just there should be a fix.

This is still a continued problem.   I understand people wanting credit, but we use hundreds of BG in a Film / TV Show or whatever.  If you speak you get a screen credit (if it's SAG, not always the same for Non-Union) and could be checked by the end credit's.  If it's a star actor doing a fun cameo and it can be confirmed then that is fun.   There needs to be a solution, with the problem being you can't certify a BG person.  They are BG, which makes them a part of the film but more part of the Crew, not cast I feel.   But since again you can't confirm this, then they either shouldn't be allowed in the "Uncredited" or set up a Background Performer section.   It really has become a little silly.   I have even seen people at comic con who are BG performers with no screen credits or a ton of "Uncredited" setting up a place for autographs.   I have worked with some and know they are BG and not a speaking cast member.    Please find a solution... I know there is a thread only started 10 years ago... so I guess we will see.

I'm interested in hearing thoughts on this if you have opinions, but be open minded and kind.  Lets have a talk / discussion, not rudeness.

Note: This comment was created from a merged conversation originally titled Background Performers getting "Uncredited" credits

3 Messages

 • 

80 Points

@Alansmithee007​ I don't understand the "can't confirm" bit. Do you need to see a BG actor's pay stub? Do you need to see a frame capture? There is no reason why there cannot be an end listing in Cast that says: "Background:"and then lists the names of the background actors. But many films list them as what they were doing. Were they a shoe shiner? Were they a limo driver? This idea that if you are Brad Pitt in Deadpool 2 who's face is on screen for about 5 seconds with no lines you should be credited, but if you are not a well-known actor in the same situation you should NOT be credited is sheer ego. And background actors are not crew. We are in front of the camera acting as a character as directed by the DP. 

   I have performed as a background actor many times. I have done so in Feature Films like Year One where I was personally praised by the Director Harold Ramis, and I have done so in House of Cards. Unless you end up on the cutting room floor, if you have performed and are in the film you should be credited, SAG or not SAG. 

   I have been in independent films as a major character and have been in films where I was just seen in the background but "enhanced the scene" with a facial reaction or other performance as requested by the DP or AD. Don't denigrate my performance by telling me you don't like to see so many names in the credits. In some cases that may be all a BG actor gets for their 12 hour day in costume and on set. 

3 Messages

 • 

80 Points

Thank you @Alansmithee007 

8 Messages

 • 

142 Points

Thank you so much for a great reply.   I'm not trying to denigrate BG performers.  I'm one who works well with BG as a AD and always treat them as the actors they are.  Having said that, there is a difference between a speaking cast member and a BG player.   This is why even if you are a SAG BG you don't receive a legal Screen Credit.   Now we are not talking about commercials here where there is a different rule about On Camera Performer and BG.   But in scripted, BG is separate then a cast member.  We use anywhere from a handful to hundreds of BG in a sc, and when I say can't confirm that is what I'm talking about.  When I say it's more like crew, I'm trying to (and if you can help that would be great) find a better term, but the job of BG is to fill the space, I have heard many times the term "Walking Prop" or "Walking Set Dressing" and I don't think that is accurate.   The reason I'm posting is trying to find a delineation between speaking cast and BG.  BG are "Crew" as they are part of the team that make the movie, is how I meant it.  But being "School Teacher" in one sc. for a 5 sec pan to the kids (cast) sitting in chairs for their Sc, is not "Cast", on that note that same "School Teacher" is going to be a "business man" in the next Sc. walking on the street.  Nor should the "Classmates / Student" should be listed as "Cast" unless they speak.   Speaking is the main delineation and can be confirmed by End Credits.

I'm suggesting a Background Performer section where all the "Uncredited" can go.  And to touch on why I say can't confirm, I have done films with 800 BG that were in costume and all for a minimum 12hr day, and that is what the job is.  I think also if BG should talk with SAG and see about this.  What are your thoughts on 800 or so BG getting a Screen Credit when they work for 10-30 seconds on film.  I'm not talking the day it takes for the job or sitting and waiting for your sc.  How should we do when you are BG in 3 separate sc's doing walk by's or handling a coffee cart 2 blocks down the street from the Sc with the dialogue?  Should that person get "Cart Vendor"?   Genuine question.

On another note, BG are supposed to directed by the AD, if a camera person, cinematographer/DP or operator usually works with a BG they are trying to fill the space to track a BG for a camera move to Cast or cover up a light, or clear the space as they are in the way of the Cast and they should be working with the AD to direct that.  That is on a union show, Non-Union is a different world, but should be run with union rules for safety and better care of Cast & Crew.  Again being BG is an important part of story telling and a great way to learn about film making and acting as you work your way to a speaking roll.   I enjoy working with BG and creating stories for behind the main scene taking place.

(edited)