Taylor's profile
Employee

Employee

 • 

2.3K Messages

 • 

40.7K Points

Tuesday, May 18th, 2021

Closed

INTRODUCING: Updated IMDb.com Title page experience

INTRODUCING: Updated IMDb.com Title page experience

We are excited to announce the launch of IMDb’s newly refreshed movie and TV show pages! The renewed page is meant to make your IMDb experience easy and enjoyable, and its design represents the diverse interests of global entertainment fans. The refresh reflects IMDb customer feedback and research designed to enhance entertainment content discovery and navigation.

Please note, we are gradually launching the new design to a selection of IMDb customers. If you do not yet see the design, we expect to make it broadly available in the weeks ahead. Thank you for using IMDb!

For more information, check out this Help article.

Oldest First
Selected Oldest First

2 Messages

 • 

70 Points

5 years ago

Where is the Content Advisory Page? Why is it not there? Why did IMDB change the format? Why did they make a mess of it? When can we go back to the old style?

Note: This comment was created from a merged conversation originally titled New page layout

Employee

 • 

8.2K Messages

 • 

190.5K Points

5 Messages

 • 

100 Points

5 years ago

I am not able to add, from the title page, a movie to a list (or lists) that I have already created. Formerly I could just click on the "+" sign and now that doesn't work. Can you explain how I can accomplish this now?

Employee

 • 

2.3K Messages

 • 

40.7K Points

@ahaycoman You can add titles to your watchlist by selecting the "+" located on the top-left of the poster image. Additionally, you can select the "+ Add to Watchlist" button or click the down arrow on the right of the "+ Add to Watchlist" button to view, create, or add to your desired list. 

See screenshots: https://community-imdb.sprinklr.com/conversations/imdbcom/introducing-updated-imdbcom-title-page-experience/60a40631c1307254c6cc1b0d?commentId=60ac1c68b706e8535ffe3821&replyId=60ac1e1915e07e0d7a657c7a 

Employee

 • 

8.2K Messages

 • 

190.5K Points

@ahaycoman  In addition to Taylor's advice above, if the "+" on the poster is not working, please see https://help.imdb.com/article/imdb/general-information/why-is-imdb-displaying-differently-on-my-browser/GF2ZAR69V859XLHF and specifically check that plug-ins such as ad-blockers are not impacting the functionality. 

3 Messages

 • 

80 Points

5 years ago

Marketing must have thought: We'll make it nice and neat'.

I think: Another failed attempt to improve a GUI by simply making the fonts bigger, expand empty spaces, change actor's pics to a groooooovy round shape and so forth.

Bottom line for me: It lost the appeal to offer a quick look on movie details and leaves you lost in a black and white desert.

If you had instead put a liiiitle effort into making some real improvements (display the movie ratings in an actor's movie list, for starters), THAT would have deserved a cheer.

10.7K Messages

 • 

226.1K Points

Using Evan Peters as an example, there are the URLs https://www.imdb.com/filmosearch/?role=nm1404239&mode=simple&page=1&sort=user_rating,desc&title_type=movie and https://www.imdb.com/search/title/?title_type=feature,tv_movie,tv_special,documentary,short,video,tv_short&role=nm1404239&view=simple&sort=user_rating,desc&count=250. However, unfortunately only one of them is easy to reach by navigating from the IMDb name page about him. I'm so glad, name pages (and also title subpath pages) still have the Quick Links side bar! I sincerely hope that IMDb keeps that format forever, regardless of how mobile device operators feel about it! Given the trend that has been commencing ever since late 2016, I'm legitimately and soundly worried that the feature I so appreciate will be whisked away from us, leaving us to fend for ourselves! I'm thinking about creating a praise thread for it, just to get the jump on the prospective problem. I've predicted certain discontinuations before, and I may be able to predict some more. Why? Because IMDb has exhibited a pattern of behavior in upgrading the website that makes it predictable. Those of us who are critics of the latest redesign need to be thinking ahead, so we won't be disappointed.

1 Message

 • 

68 Points

5 years ago

No offense, but there is too much scrolling on the new site.  The old site was more compact and easier to navigate.  The size of the character photos and names has a lot of wasted space, as well as most of the other segments of the page.  I preferred the old page.

4 Messages

 • 

84 Points

5 years ago

I have been a regular user of IMDB.com for more than two decades probably and I am sorry, but I am saddened by your new format. I wondered if you might take a poll from your users/staff to consider your previous user-friendly format? Now, it's hard to immediately see the stars/Metacritic appears to be out of view or gone and the screen is so huge that you have to scroll through lots of stuff to get to the director, etc. At the very least, maybe you could consider putting the stars/ratings directly under the title of the movie as previously as the place the ratings are in now is an unfortunate place to put them. Thank you for considering taking a poll of your users opinions and this comment.

Note: This comment was created from a merged conversation originally titled Disappointed with new IMDB format.

2 Messages

 • 

62 Points

Same here. With imdb almost from the beginning, have contributed a few things as well, and voted for hundreds of movies and series. I which they would have asked regular users or would give us a chance to keep the old design - like reddit does with old.reddit - instead of just making it mandatory for all. So much worse than before.
Well, I guess that's Amazon for you. :(

4 Messages

 • 

84 Points

Oh my. I don't follow the community but it looks like almost every single poster agrees that the format is terrible. It's actually way more than terrible. It's useless. In addition to having to scroll all over the page to find various bits of information you are looking for, the website actually is so much slower to navigate because of all the ads and images that were included in this new formatting version. I get it about money, but I used to look up a ton of info in a short amount of time on IMDB for movies and because it's not functional anymore, I think I'm going to stick to Metacritic and look at the Google details on IMDB for the relevant information. So disappointed we can't have the option to use the old version.

3 Messages

 • 

80 Points

5 years ago

Terrible. Poorly conceived. Looks like something ten-year-olds might think is neat, but just annoying for anyone with a normal adult intelligence. Nowhere near as useful as the old version. Now I have to click around to find what used to be clearly displayed on the landing page. It's as badly thought out as a Microsoft product.

21 Messages

 • 

470 Points

5 years ago

Sorry for saying it, but every time IMDB decides to change the movie page  it is for worst.

Why impose what we must see instead let us to choose? 

Some people like to see technical infos about the movie instead people fan club things.  Is it a movie page or people page? 

At least put a "view old page" option for us.

2 Messages

 • 

92 Points

5 years ago

You guys woke up and chose ugly ,huh? Its not so much that we all hate change or afraid of change  its that you have made the site as un- user friendly, and ugly as possible. It is  frustratingly over sized and clunky.  So disappointing. 

5 Messages

 • 

92 Points

5 years ago

Please change it back

Note: This comment was created from a merged conversation originally titled Your new website design is horrible

5 Messages

 • 

92 Points

I'm not alone https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/nhk44v/imdb_has_changed_its_layout_to_something/

2 Messages

 • 

70 Points

5 years ago

Really? This "New Look" is VIRTUALLY UNUSABLE. It's useless! Seriously WTF

 

Whoever thought of / designed this / signed off on this crap should be taken out back and shot

10.7K Messages

 • 

226.1K Points

A permanent solution to a temporary problem? Also, that is just plain criminal and immoral, whereas the redesign of the title page experience is completely lawful. Those violent remarks are bound to be purged from the public eye.

5 Messages

 • 

92 Points

5 years ago

This is terrible, what a waste of space, looks horrible.

1 Message

 • 

60 Points

5 years ago

Takes longer to scroll through and is extremely unpleasant to use and look at. I never watch the trailer on imdb, so I don't like it so big. I only look at the rating, synopsis and trivia - that's it. But now the trailer, pictures, cast and "more like this" have been bloated up so it's very inconvenient to scroll past them. How does "more like this" section having bigger pictures make it faster and easier to use? It was fine before, now it's like an seniors' mobile phone with extremely large buttons. Website feels dumbed down, like a kids' cartoon home page. I wish there was an option to change back to the old interface, otherwise I'm just going to use the website a lot less and get the info I need from Wikipedia.

I assume the goal was to make it slower to use so that people would spend more time on the website? 

10 Messages

 • 

232 Points

@Diskreetne

I thought at first sight also it looks like a seniors mobile application.This is a trend and yes imo it is dumbing down sites & software. Windows XP was user friendly, functional and simple, you needed a bit of knowledge yes but with plug & play everybody could use it. Then MS continually dumbed the UI down so that every idiot could use it, huge icons, and blew up the OS at the same time, forced updates and interactions, it comes with all that baggage (nobody asks me if I want all that crap), a ton of processes running who use up almost half of your CPU.

1 Message

 • 

62 Points

5 years ago

As others have said the new layout takes up too much space and involves a lot more scrolling and clicking of links to find relevant information.

Fonts are too big as are photos and videos.

This just isn't going to be a case of getting used to something new, it really is harder to find what you want. Would really prefer going back to the original, more compact design if we could.

Champion

 • 

5.1K Messages

 • 

118.7K Points

5 years ago

My fear is that this new method for listing cast will be implemented on the /fullcredits page.

I, too, dislike all the extra white space on the title page, and the double columns for cast, but adopted it months ago for the increased utility of adding the title to lists. (I would frequently switch back for other things.) And I complained about these things immediately when the trial version of the new title page was made available.

Now I tend to click away from the title page fairly quickly to find other things I want, like who played character x, or what's the name of the character played by y.

If all sub-pages of a title (and perhaps the name pages too) are going to be implemented in the same fashion as the Home Page and the Title Page, then the IMDb site really could become unusable.

10.7K Messages

 • 

226.1K Points

I'm worried that the quick links menu will be removed and substituted with the absurd "all topics" widget, in addition to the layout of cast listings.

1 Message

 • 

66 Points

5 years ago

Please add a possibility to switch back to the old design.