Employee
•
16K Messages
•
297.4K Points
IMDb Web Title Subpages Redesign
We are excited to announce IMDb’s redesign of 6 Title subpages! In the coming days, IMDb will incrementally roll out Trivia, Goofs, Filming & Locations, Crazy Credits, Quotes, and Plot Keywords. These refreshed pages are meant to enhance the IMDb experience for all customers worldwide, improving the discovery and navigation with easier access to celebrity, movie, and TV content on any device. The updated experience reflects feedback and suggestions from customers as well as in-depth research.
In the coming months, we plan to continue updating IMDb pages throughout the site. We hope you enjoy these latest improvements, and thank you for continuing to make IMDb the world's most trusted source for movie, TV, and entertainment content.
— The IMDb Team
Title Trivia Subpage Title Goofs Subpage
Peter_pbn
Champion
•
13K Messages
•
314.9K Points
4 months ago
Keywords with only downvotes are not sorted lower than keywords with no votes. I wonder if this is intentional?
Example: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1727824/keywords
2
0
jordanbrown
3 Messages
•
92 Points
4 months ago
I don't know if this is the right place for a comment on the new Trivia format, but... it's a *lot* less dense. Please switch back, or at least make it an option to switch back.
0
mbmb
1.7K Messages
•
22.9K Points
4 months ago
I think it doesn't look good when an item with a shared link is duplicated on the page like this:
4
nobody
27 Messages
•
390 Points
4 months ago
I noticed the problem again today and came searching for this old discussion.
Here are just a few more examples of this still-existing issue.
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1745960/trivia/#cameo
[Missing Name] "Uncredited, as Carole Bradshaw, via archive footage."
[Missing Name] "Uncredited, as Charlotte 'Charlie' Blackwood, via archive footage."
[Missing Name] "Uncredited, as Nick 'Goose' Bradshaw, via archive footage."
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0117951/trivia/?item=tr0758464
[Missing Name] "as Mikey Forrester, Renton's heroin dealer."
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2788710/trivia/?item=tr2324935
[Missing Name] "appearance was shot during post-production..."
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2788710/trivia/?item=tr2329092
[Missing Names] "both appear in this film. ..."
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0167260/trivia/?item=tr0619321
[Missing Name] "Seen over Legolas's shoulder during the drinking game..."
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt3748528/trivia/?item=tr3321074
[Missing Names] "as the Death Star crew members manning the super laser shaft. ..."
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0081505/trivia/?item=tr0792965
[Missing Name] "In the party scene. She wore a black dress and sat on the right side of the sofa closest to the bar."
2
DanDud88
169 Messages
•
3.8K Points
4 months ago
Yea the bullet points for trivia entries aren't showing up now on the new version of the site.
2
lorenzo_avenali
28 Messages
•
550 Points
4 months ago
Hi,
Checking blooper page on the website for a FUBAR episode (https://www.imdb.com/title/tt18500790/goofs/?ref_=tttrv_sa_1) only TWO goofs are shown.
But on the App I see three.
The "missing" one has a "SPOILER" alert, maybe it's related to this?
4
0
samiam
2 Messages
•
70 Points
3 months ago
Let's make those categories at 'More from this title' at the bottom of a page a different color or faded like they were before when there isn't anything on that page. I check crazy credits on every movie I see and it is quite frustrating to click on it and then there is nothing there.
2
tboeckmann
2 Messages
•
70 Points
3 months ago
I just want to say that the new design of the Awards page is absolutely awful! I am a library cataloger, specializing in video cataloging, and use IMDb daily to help flesh out details in my records.
The previous design of showing each award in a grid, grouping winning categories together, made it very easy to quickly differentiate wins vs nominations. The new design has all the categories listed in no discernable order, and since some of the awards may be collapsed, I can't even count on using Control-F to find all instances of "winner".
In addition, the old design displayed the awards alphabetically (with the exception of the big ones (Academy, BAFTA, etc.) at the top). Since I need to track certain awards and not others, it was relatively easy to scroll through an alphabetical list and know approximately where to find them on the page. The order of awards on the new design appears to be completely random, making it extremely difficult to find what I need.
I'm not sure who thought this randomization of information would be helpful to anyone. I have been using IMDb to help with video cataloging for 20 years, and until this recent change, loved being able to find everything I needed in one place. I am seriously thinking about abandoning it for this purpose and visiting the websites for each award instead.
0
0
Bill_Saunders
2 Messages
•
70 Points
16 days ago
Why is only some of the trivia listed and I have to click to get it all? Why wouldn't it list all of it, and on what mysterious grounds do they show some items and not others? This is a good example of the Internet trying to reach the lowest common denominator. If I'm interested in the trivia, would I want to see all of it?
0
0