Wicked

Scott: As to the title, I'd prefer to interpret "Part I" as a subtitle rather than transcribe the typographical flourishes. Per https://help.imdb.com/article/contribution/titles/title-formatting/G56U5ERK7YY47CQB#,  "Subtitles are separated from the main title with a colon for English titles ...."

Putting tildes around the words "Part I" would be, in my opinion, an overly literal-minded decision, along the lines of what happened some years ago when somebody noticed that there were dots between the letters in the title sequence of "Friends":

... and then changed the IMDb title of the series to "F·r·i·e·n·d·s". (Yes, that really happened; fortunately, the decision was reversed soon afterwards.)

(If the dancers really are credited, then, yes, the (uncredited) attribute should be removed, but the IMDb staff will have to help with that.)

Hi @scott_l1zxrc3yyo2sw,

I can confirm the "(uncredited)" attribute has been removed from the dancer credits you're referring to, and that they've been moved to the appropriate department (out of the cast section), as they are not credited directly with the main cast on-screen.

Additionally, as @gromit82 has alluded to below, the title text for this page is currently displaying as it should per our formatting guidelines. We would not include such specific formatting such as the tildes here in the subtitle's text.

I hope this helps!