Sir_Launcelot's profile

11 Messages

 • 

292 Points

Thursday, March 5th, 2026

Answered

Who is the Distributor in this example?

Here are two sets of images for 2 'Castle Vision' VHS videos. For one of them, 'Castle Communications PLC' are responsible for the production of the title, the other - 'Casper', they are not. However, in both instances, both on the box and on the tape is the phrase "A Castle Communications PLC Release" alongside the more obvious "Castle Vision" logo. This is the case across most of their titles. (On Wikipedia it says Castle Communications' video imprint was Castle Vision). 

Now I'm not sure as to which form of their name I should go with as the Distributor. For example in both cases, should it read "Distributor: Castle Communications - Attribute Field: as Castle Vision"? I have read the guidelines and find I can make a case to go multiple ways about this. What's the precise input answer for this? And an explanation would be most appreciated as well. Thankyou in advance!

     

Oldest First
Selected Oldest First

11 Messages

 • 

292 Points

29 days ago

Hi, just to mention I initially accidently posted this onto the 'I need to know section' it went to 'private' and has now been edited over here to the Data Issues & Policy Discussions section. It has been live here for less time than what currently shows.

(edited)

Employee

 • 

7.2K Messages

 • 

75.5K Points

26 days ago

Hi Sir_Launcelot-

To answer your question, yes, this is the correct way to list the distributor on these films: 

Distributor: Castle Communications with the attribute "as Castle Vision."

Since the packaging states 'A Castle Communications PLC Release' the distributor is Castle Communications. While Castle Vision is a 'home-video label' used by Castle Communications rather than being a separate distrubuting company of these titles. 

Cheers!

11 Messages

 • 

292 Points

Hi, thank you for your helpful and informative reply.

I would like to add a line of reasoning I came up with. In this example, rather than just inputting Attribute: “as Castle Vision", which, if I understand correctly, could imply that “Castle Communications” does not actually appear as the distributor but rather that “Castle Vision” alone does, I believe that in this instance, as both do appear, it might better read as “also as Castle Vision." I think this is the clearest way of detailing this specific detail. (This of course means if people now search for this title's particular distribution they'll clearly know that both avenues could produce results, -depending on how it may have been listed.)

Please correct me if I am mistaken in any way. Thankyou.