The people verifying the contributions are incompetent

Hello! Today, fortunately, the changes were finally approved (I also did not change anything in my proofs). This has been going on since March 27, and every day my contributions were rejected, but only occasionally accepted. Maybe it's worth introducing some kind of reputation for users who add information? Why check my contributions if I've already made a lot of them all the time, and I've never made a mistake? Let them check people with little experience or unverified users. Here are my contributions: #250329-180646-056000, #250328-090602-083000, #250329-180646-056000, #250331-125421-627000, #250402-083354-199000, #250403-073936-135000, #250404-103303-596000

@MarStan- Thank you for providing the submission references! There were errors in the supporting links for these ones that were firstly rejected as the supporting links gave out an empty page (250328-090602-083000, 250402-083354-199000, 250403-073936-135000). But I can see, yes, that the re-submissions the links were working now and these were approved.

The links are empty because they were links to the hosting site where my proofs were stored. They had an expiration date of one week (which has already passed), so they were erased from the Internet and are now empty. At that time, the inspectors had all the necessary information, so that's not the reason.