738 Messages
•
15.5K Points
Should these entries go in Crazy Credits rather than Trivia?
For a TV mini-series, a series-level entry
"The same cast list in the closing credits was used for all four episodes, so many of the minor cast are shown as "uncredited" in IMDB." - submission ID 260707-191324-899000
For individual episodes, entries such as
"Opening caption: August 1973" - contained in submission ID 260707-155547-297000
All of these have been rejected as "Does not meet contribution guidelines." with not a clue which rule I have violated.
They relate to title A Married Man(1983– ) tt008768
I would have thought that noteworthy information which relates to how the opening titles and closing credits were displayed and what information was contained in them, would have belonged in the Crazy Credits section...
|
Maya
Employee
•
8.4K Messages
•
88.4K Points
17 days ago
Hi martin_695862-
Thank you for posting the references! Further reviewing, both of these won't fit on either of those datas.
For the first one, for example, this data is captured under the cast list section (showing the credited cast on each episode and uncredited cast) - so this would be redundant under 'Trivia.' Also, it is not a 'Crazy Credit,' unless this was phrased on-screen.
And as per the second submission of this text caption, it is just a caption to set the timeframe. It's not a credit that will qualify to be in the 'Crazy Credit' section nor it's 'Trivia.' This second one could maybe go under 'Quotes' as a title card, like for example, how this following text caption is under 'Star Wars: Episode IV - A New Hope.'
Cheers!
(edited)
0
0