Champion
•
3K Messages
•
72.5K Points
Should Alan Smithee exist in the database?
I noticed this while watching Death of a Gunfighter. Alan Smithee is a pseudonym and for the movie I'm watching, both directors are listed as long as Alan Smithee. These credits should exist on the people's name page, when known.
dan_dassow
Champion
•
19.3K Messages
•
475.6K Points
9 months ago
I agree with @adrian.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Smithee
Alan Smithee (also Allen Smithee) is an official pseudonym used by film directors who wish to disown a project. Coined in 1968 and used until it was formally discontinued in 2000,[1] it was the sole pseudonym used by members of the Directors Guild of America (DGA) when directors, dissatisfied with the final product, proved to the satisfaction of a guild panel that they had not been able to exercise creative control over a film. The director was also required by guild rules not to discuss the circumstances leading to the movie or even to acknowledge being the project's director.[2]
2
0
gromit82
Champion
•
7.4K Messages
•
275K Points
9 months ago
In this case, I disagree with Adrian and Dan. The "Alan Smithee" pseudonym is a notorious aspect of the film industry. Even though it is not a real person, I support keeping the page as an indicator of the films credited under that name, as an exception to standard IMDb policy.
3
eboy
2.5K Messages
•
69.2K Points
9 months ago
I don’t personally fully understand why ”Alan Smithee” should have a name page. If someone is credited with that name, it should be covered with ”(as…)” attribute. So you can use search and still find the name.
(edited)
0
Tonio_Fraga
153 Messages
•
2.2K Points
9 months ago
Are you kidding me? After I bothered to merge several clones of the original Alan Smithee (you know: II, III, etc.) a while back?
Good 'ol Alan Smithee is here to stay.
1
0
Michelle
Employee
•
17.2K Messages
•
310.3K Points
9 months ago
Hi @adrian & All -
Currently all credits or information belonging to a single individual should be listed on their page; we do not knowingly create multiple names or names pages to separate credits for a single individual, even if they used or were credited under more than one name.
With that being said, given the listing for "Alan Smithee", this is a collective name page exception (like those of a band or any other groups of performers) because the name itself refers to more than one person. So for this credited name, for example, if we know that a director has used the pseudonym “Alan Smithee” on a film, we will list the credit on that director's IMDb page in addition to being listed on Alan Smithee’s IMDb page.
I hope this helps clarify our policy!
10
Tonio_Fraga
153 Messages
•
2.2K Points
4 months ago
Right now, there are at least 16 unaccounted for, rogue clones of the original Alan Smithee:
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm16071720/
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm3446869/
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm3954698/
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm4333338
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm5319956
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0810810/
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm2947713/
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0810465/
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm11343283
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm3955350/
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm14411374/
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm3809075/
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm5043179/
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm1943831/
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm9161613/
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm5144766/
But for some reason, when I try to merge all these unnecessary clones into the original one, no matter the lengths I go to explain the Smithee phenomenon in the submissions, all get declined.
I implore you to merge these 16 slight variations and clones of Alan Smithee into the original one.
Makes no sense to allow the proliferation of slightly different spelled variations and clones of the same pseudonym used for the same reason: to hide the real identity of the person in question.
Thanks.
(edited)
8
0