Reviews rejected without helpful explanation

I understand IMDb is a private company and they can do what they like. And like many, some of my reviews have been rejected. But what's frustrating is the lack of feedback. How hard is it to specify which word, sentence, paragraph or rules are the issue? Most of my reviews are accepted. I often write 10 or more paragraphs. I didn't even realise how many of my reviews had been rejected because you don't get a notification and over time I forget what movies I've reviewed so I don't notice the ones which are missing. That's annoying in itself. To find it months later and see "declined" with nothing else is frustrating. There's nothing constructive about it.

Whatever the process is for rejecting, it's terrible and should be more specific. And that should be easy to implement! In the time it takes to find an issue, you can then SPECIFY the issue. Highlight the "offending" parts! I don't mind making mild compromises to comply with IMDb. At the same time, I resent the level of control or "censorship". But I accept it in the sense that IMDb is kind of publishing these reviews. Fine, it's a trade-off. But please, why can't they be more specific?

For example, is the word "woke" outright banned? Are there any other words which are banned like "stupid", "dumb" or "retarded"? I just need to know. If I knew which words or which paragraph was the problem, it would be so much easier to edit my reviews and at least get them accepted, to mutual benefit. It also helps to specify which rules have been broken. Why make me guess? I don't think I mentioned other reviewers, I don't think I strayed too far from the subject matter, etc. Why not just say "paragraph 6 breaks rule 14"? That's so simple and far more useful.

Otherwise, I have to keep guessing, usually incorrectly, and then resubmitting and wasting more time for everyone.