Review for Attack of the 50 Foot Camgirl declined twice

Hi! As the title says, my review for Attack of the 50 Foot Camgirl has been declined twice. The first time the reason I was given was "Does not meet contribution guidelines", which I took to mean that it was flawed in several ways. I completely rewrote it to try and ensure that I had covered all my bases in removing anything that might be objectionable about it, but then it was rejected for being "Badly Formatted". I have no idea whatsoever what aspect of the formatting is badly done. Can I get some help refining it to get it approved, please? The review in question is below.

Summary: Like a porn parody, without the sex

Body:

This movie didn't have to be bad. Derivative, yes, but not bad. After all, the same general formula has been used before in Attack of the 60 Foot Centerfold and Attack of the 50 Foot Cheerleader, both of which were surprisingly entertaining. When comparing Attack of the 50 Foot Camgirl to those films, the plot makes even less sense (starting from an already low baseline), far fewer of the jokes land (almost none, in fact), and the acting... Well, the acting is a serious contendor for the worst I've ever seen.

The fatal flaw of this film, however, is the fact that none of the characters are at all likeable. They're so awful that it takes the experience from boring to unpleasant. It's obvious that we're supposed to hate our protagonist's 2-timing slimeball husband, and his sadistic, envy-stricken mistress, but even the protagonist herself is vile! On top of just generally being mean and dismissive to all the other characters, she's portrayed as incredibly arrogant, going as far as to monologue about how she will be worshipped as a god the world over. Meanwhile the side-characters are just obnoxious and gross.

At the end of the day, if you're looking for a good giantess film, you have lots of options... and this is the worst one. You can safely skip it.