106 Messages
•
1.9K Points
Reliable Sources Dismissed By Some Incompetent Editor
Hi,
Lately, I have been shockingly observing weirdly declined birth date and birth name submissions of mine in spite of copied and shared as a screenshot via the solid, verifiable public records in addition to social media posts. I also come across this in some pending keywords. So, most of the time I have to submit again hoping them to be processed by a competent editor who knows what he is doing. If the same person processes them, you know the answer and my dismay.
I have been a constant contributor in these data types, so lately this situation has been highly unfavorable.
Unless the editor or editors in question has been warned, I am going to stop contributing them on a regular basis.
1 - Here, that person deleted the birthday and partially approved the submission despite the day is in the second link (submitted again, now approved):
4 - Declined these keywords randomly:
6 - Declined the birth date & place despite the public record evidence in addition to social media (submitted again, now approved): #241126-235621-899000
7 - Declined the birth name despite taken from a public record: #241119-005324-399000
8 - Didn't bother to check the second page for the birth name in addition to a public record:
13 - Declined the birth name despite taken from a public record:
jabrenner
106 Messages
•
1.9K Points
28 days ago
Some recently re-submitted ones have been approved now, probably by another editor. However, the overall problem still needs to be addressed.
I am waiting for a reply from the staff regarding this situtiaton.
On a similar note, #241127-160036-272000 still declined despite the same source of evidence.
(edited)
0
0
Bethanny
Employee
•
5.6K Messages
•
58.9K Points
28 days ago
Hi @jabrenner -
In most of the cases I can see our editors were unable to verify the records belonged to the same person, I created the ticket V1595380419 to investigate all submissions.
Cheers!
1