FeRDNYC's profile

105 Messages

 • 

2.6K Points

Saturday, February 7th, 2026

Solved

"Random" (and misrepresented) images in Photos collection for Tarzan: The Epic Adventures

This is something I've never seen before. I'm not sure what to make of it.

Tarzan: The Epic Adventures was a largely forgettable late-1990s TV series in the "UPN Saturday afternoon" vein. It ran for just a single 22-episode season and starred Joe Lara, who died in 2021.

But the odd thing is the IMDb photos collection for the title:

  •  All of the first twenty-five title photos (of 62 total) are images of actors from the series cast list.
  • Each one is labeled the same way, "$NAME at an event for Tarzan: The Epic Adventures (1996)".
  • All of them are clearly just random headshots of those actors, not taken at any event whatsoever (much less one for this particular series).
  • All 25 images have no relationship whatsoever to the title, other than the fact that the actors pictured were part of the cast.

Here's what the thumbnail grid looks like for the first few (of, again, TWENTY-FIVE):   

Why are those images there, attached to that title? Are they valid title images that belong there under IMDb policy? And who is putting in the effort to submit all these photos, falsely claiming that they were taken "at an event for $OBSCURE_1990S_SHOW", when it's far more likely they were taken from the Google Images search results for each actor's name?

Oldest First
Selected Oldest First

Accepted Solution

Employee

 • 

7K Messages

 • 

73.2K Points

1 month ago

Hi FeRDNYC-

Thank you for reporting! Further reviewing, this has been corrected and the changes will be live on the site shortly.

Cheers!

Champion

 • 

16.1K Messages

 • 

348.7K Points

It is interesting that the title was untagged from the images, but (at least some of) the images are still listed and can be seen in the title's cast list since they are headshots for several of the cast members. My guess is that this was the main purpose of these image uploads, which must have been made by someone with special access. I have seen the same pattern on other titles in the past. As a user I can't really have a problem with names having headshots, but I'm a little surprised that IMDb allows it.

105 Messages

 • 

2.6K Points

@Peter_pbn​ Yeah, someone has clearly twigged to the potential for the phrase "at an event for" to serve as a magical passkey, one that lets them submit any photo of an actor to any title. If successful, it bypasses messy considerations like whether the actor is in costume, or has visibly aged from their appearance in the role, etc. Hopefully staff will try to tighten the acceptance criteria for those submissions a bit.

I confess I didn't look closely enough, before this was corrected, to see whether the pictured actors' headshots were supplied by the uploads to this series, but... I doubt it. While I'm not intimately familiar with the process, AIUI there are better ways of submitting a photo for a name page. I suspect this went in the other direction — someone harvested the actors' headshots from their IMDb pages and re-submitted them as title photos. I still don't understand why they'd do that, but I doubt I ever will.

Champion

 • 

16.1K Messages

 • 

348.7K Points

@FeRDNYC​ 

I did check, and the headshots are the same image uploads as the ones in the title gallery — they have the same media numbers. If you don't take my word for it, you can see some of the images and their URLs on this archived page:

https://web.archive.org/web/20260105002213/https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0115385/

For example

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0115385/mediaviewer/rm1827735553/

is the same as

https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0135131/mediaviewer/rm1827735553/

Usually the only way to submit a photo to a name page is to pay for IMDbPro and claim the page as a representative. It is possible the images were submitted by someone with special access to name pages (but then why tag the title?)

Anyone can submit images to a title page, but a regular user did not submit these as they would not have appeared atop the gallery like they did, nor would they normally be added to name pages. But IMDb also lets associated companies representatives submit images through a feature called Scorecard.

105 Messages

 • 

2.6K Points

1 month ago

(...And, changing gears, why is my question set Private?)

Employee

 • 

8.4K Messages

 • 

193.2K Points

@FeRDNYC​ Ah, all posts containing images are automatically set to Private by the Sprinklr software to protect against spam posts; any such posts which are not spam will be manually set to public the next time an IMDb team member sees the thread (as is the case here :-). 

105 Messages

 • 

2.6K Points

@Col_Needham​ Given the topic of my inquiry, I can't deny the prudence of that approach!