tom_wake's profile

461 Messages

 • 

7.6K Points

Thursday, March 30th, 2023

In Progress

"producer" attributes in cast credits

I've just had to remove some producers from a cast list. This has happened before (though it still escapes me as to why anyone does it in the first place), but the strange thing about these was that they were using the IMDb-approved cast attributes "producer" and "executive producer".

Is there any legitimate reason for keeping these attributes? And if not, could they all be deleted please? Considering how limiting the cast attributes can sometimes be, it seems extraordinary that multiple ones could exist for an entirely different department!

Hopefully, if the attributes are removed it might also stop some of the people who insist on submitting every crew credit to the cast lists...

Oldest First
Selected Oldest First

186 Messages

 • 

2.7K Points

3 years ago

Just to clarify - you're talking about attributes, and not characters descriptions (e.g. "Self - Producer")? If a producer actually appears in a talk show or documentary, then a cast entry is appropriate. But if you are, in fact, talking about an attribute, I'd be interested in knowing what the character entry is.

461 Messages

 • 

7.6K Points

@scgary66​ Yes, it was an attribute; I've since removed the credit and re-added them in the producer category, so can't supply the link, but it was essentially just a regular cast credit with "(producer)" in the attribute field.

Speaking of character descriptions, I've always wondered about that as well. Usually they are used for describing that person's role IN the talk show, documentary, whatever - so, "Self - Host", "Self - Narrator", etc. But I have also noticed them used to transcribe the subtitle in talking head documentaries, e.g. "Self - Director". But then, taking those other credits as a precedent, the implication is that those people perform that particular role on-screen; otherwise, there's a complete inconsistency about how these roles are credits. Granted, there won't be many situations where there's much overlap or confusion, but it certainly does happen. (For example, I have seen "Self - Host of [game show name]" in both documentaries, and kid's entertainment shows with a game show strand. Or "Self - Producer" or "Director" in talk shows or game shows where they walk onto camera for whatever reason.)

It seems to me that "Self - [role]" should only be used where those people are performing that role IN the title, otherwise we're trying to have it both ways. But I'm probably in a minority, judging by how many of those types of credits already exist.

(edited)

Champion

 • 

15.7K Messages

 • 

344.2K Points

@tom_wake​ 

I agree there is such an inconsistency. To resolve it would probably require a guideline update: While the main guideline says to describe "their role in the title," the more specific guidelines here also say, "For news and current affairs programs/documentaries, the description given in the subtitle when the name appears on screen is preferred." And those descriptions are often not about their role in the title.

(edited)

186 Messages

 • 

2.7K Points

@tom_wake​ Was the character field for the producers blank? Still curious. As for the general formatting issue, in cases of a documentary in which someone is interviewed, or appear briefly for some other reason, I've got no problem with a descriptor which indicates why they're appearing (e.g. Self - Childhood Friend, Self - Rock Music Critic, Self - Murder Witness, etc.). For most non-fiction series (game shows, talk shows, news programs), their function is usually more standardized and discernible from the type of program.

(edited)

461 Messages

 • 

7.6K Points

@scgary66​ The character field just repeated the person's name, with "producer" or "executive producer" in the attribute field.

I watched the thing itself, just to make sure, but they did not appear on camera, only in the credits as producers

186 Messages

 • 

2.7K Points

@tom_wake​ Apparently similar to the way producers, directors, etc. get their names attached to photos and videos even when they don't appear in them.

186 Messages

 • 

2.7K Points

@Peter_pbn​ And regarding descriptions below names - quite often, more than one description is used (contributor, newspaper editorial board, institute fellow, author). If it's someone with an established page and numerous credits, I don't think a description is necessary; if it's a new page for a person, or relatively few credits (and particularly for a common name), I'll usually add a description to their bio page, and ideally an external link or two.

2.5K Messages

 • 

69.2K Points

3 years ago

I personally add the role, if it’s listed with the name ("Self - [role]"). I would think that the word ”Self” explains the situation. To be honest, it’s not really my problem if some people still confuse it with ”acting” role.

The role (director/teacher/prime minister/etc) could actually be quite important in the long run, especially if there are different people with the same (or very similar) name (to identify different people).

(edited)

Employee

 • 

18.2K Messages

 • 

321.3K Points

2 years ago

Hi @tom_wake & All -

Concerning the listing of "producer" and "executive producer" within the Attribute selection menu when submitting cast credits, I have filed a ticket to the appropriate team to review and consider removing these listed options.

For the other inconsistency issues discussed (i. character name descriptions, self credits, etc.), I will be raising these call-outs with our policy team for visibility.