Problem displaying data on the rewards page (most likely some internal technical problem)

@Michelle​ According to rejected applications, there was a link with a proof (the official site of the award) - since it is precisely those sections of the awards that include several films (the Young Hope nomination, where personalities and films noted by the organizing committee are awarded).   As for the technical problem, it covers not only 2019, but also 2022 and 2021-1. For example, in 2021, these are sections of make-up, short films (fiction and documentary).

@Michelle​ Number five, I had Art Direction. This one didn't pass.

@Michelle​ And another question, is there a technical possibility to change the name of the award in the years 2007-2018 from the Gopos Award to the correct Gopo Award? Then I would have been able to manually correct the names of the nominations over time - with the same Romanian names as I did for 2023-2019. Thank you.

@Michelle​ Instead of 230518-184113-606000 230518-185319-584000 , I sent a request again to add #230523-114022-425000

Hm.Rejected again. Well, I don’t know what other proofs need to be added so that it doesn’t reject. Because it is more official than the official site of the award ....

@Michelle​  On the first point: in this category, both personalities and films are awarded (it can be one film or maybe four at once), but there is one slot - personalities in the first place. That is, if you leave only the personalities, then it will be necessary to remove all the films of all recipients and nominees for all the years in the same order - this is how the "architecture" of this category is now built on the site. The most surprising thing is that just the option is only a person, and films in additional information - IMDB stubbornly does not accept when I somehow tried to do just that. In the Supplementary info section for this category, it is indicated what position the nominee occupied, since this is a category for novice artists and filmmakers, there are actors, directors, editors, etc. there. (some even in multi-personal roles, for example, a person can be nominated as an actor, screenwriter, director - in a one-man show, and this is what highlights her achievements as a young talent). For clarity, I’ll show you how it looks on the Gopo Awards website (alas, it’s in Romanian): On the second point I will write a little later, now there is no technical possibility. On the third point. The name has not changed. Initially, the name of the award was spelled incorrectly in English by the contributors. As a result, it turned out that now there are two versions of the name. The correct for all award years would be: "Gopo Award". Yes, Gopos just listed incorrectly.

Hi @den_budanov​ - 1) Thanks for confirming those details.  In the meantime I have communicated the issue at hand with our editors and confirmed that we do allow these submissions in the format you provided when an individual is awarded for a body of work and this is recognized on the official festival listing.  I have now approved these Wins and they are now listed on the site. 2) Yes, let us know the details if this is still an issue. 3) Thanks for confirming the spelling error.  I filed a ticket (#P91503174) for the clean-up. Thanks again for your patience!

@Michelle​ Greetings. Yes, the "second point" is no longer a problem, cheers. The technical error has been corrected and I see that the information is already fully and correctly displayed. In turn, I added small "cosmetic" additions to bring everything to the uniformity of design and full display of information, according to the official site of the award. Here is the tracker of the number (I hope there will be no problems with their confirmation and you won’t have to confirm the same thing a thousand times)))): 230616-190316-270000 230616-190652-452000 230616-191844-299000 If everything is confirmed, then the period of the award for 2019-2023 will be correct. And after correcting the wrong name for previous years, I will be able to periodically correct past editions of the award - since there are incomplete data, some nominations are written with errors, and there are errors for some nominees / winners (for example, the last contributor erroneously indicated directors as nominees for best film, although according to award regulations, this category is for films and their producers). Thanks again for your help. It took a long time, of course, but I understand. Thanks again.

@Michelle​ I apologize for a small off-topic, but in order not to create a separate topic, I thought that this issue can be resolved immediately here. The fact is that I am contributing this festival: Docudays UA International Documentary Human Rights Film Festival And when I did the first edits a few years ago, I mistakenly accidentally made a small mistake in the name of the nominations, adding in brackets information from the regulations, however, which actually does not appear in the name of the official nominations and may vary from year to year. When I tried to fix it, the site and moderation didn't skip edits, because they thought that since the category name already exists, it cannot be corrected. Now the category names look like this: DOCU/SHORT (the international competition of short documentaries which are up to 30 minutes long) DOCU/UKRAINE (the national competition includes documentaries of varying lengths, created in Ukraine or in co-production with Ukraine) DOCU/WORLD (the international competition of feature- and medium-length documentaries which are longer than 30 minutes) Is it possible to correct the name of the award and remove what is in brackets (emphasized that it should be removed from the name of the awards)? That is, the correct names of the awards are: DOCU/SHORT, DOCU/UKRAINE, DOCU/WORLD We are talking about 2023-2014. In justification and as a proof, I bring a screen from the official page of the festival Thx

@den_budanov​ Hi- I can confirm that I have now corrected the names of these Awards and removed the information within the brackets. The changes are already live on the site.  Cheers!

Great news. Yes, everything is super (about Docudays)!

@Maya​ Thks. Yes, I see that all the changes have been put into effect. This is cool. There is one detail left. The third time I add an edit and it is constantly rejected. It's about additional information displayed. It is simply strange that in all other cases for this category the information was accepted, and in this case they are stubbornly rejected, although I gave justifications when adding. Here is the tracker number of the last contribution: 230620-162230-868000 But in general, I noticed such a feature that when Supplementary info is initially added to 95%, the moderator rejects it, which greatly complicates and increases the process of contribution. Because in the case of Goppo, these are two categories - the Best European Film and the Young Hope Award, where this section must be filled out. Because of what it is necessary to propose editing several times before it is approved. UPD: 230620-162230-868000 - approved, the information is already displayed. Thanks again.  

@Maya​ Another such question. If the film award will award awards for two different years, how to arrange it correctly? In this case, we are talking about the awards of the Ukrainian Film Academy. Due to the war, no awards were presented last year. This year, the awards will be presented in two separate years, that is, all categories will be duplicated for 2022 and 2023 (a new category will be added in the 2023 slot, and it will not be in 2022). That is, the awards will be presented in two years, but most likely at one ceremony (the organizers have not yet made a final decision). Do I understand correctly that it will be necessary to make awards 2023 and 2023-1?

@den_budanov​ Hi-  Apologies on the delayed reply.  Correct it will be be necessary to have both 2023 and then for the other, add the dash for the same year but instead of 1, it will have to be 2023-2.

@Maya​ ok, thx