Misogynous reviews from one user

Hi. I was reading user reviews for the series Fifteen-Love and came across one I consider particularly offensive. The series deals with the sexual abuse of a teenage tennis player by her coach. In his review, the user posits that the series missed "the opportunity to do something actually brave — provide an example of a FALSE allegation of assault" and suggests quite openly that not "ALL women tell the truth about sexual assault and violence" (both sets of caps are his).

Curious to see whether this user had made similar comments in other reviews, I looked him up. I found that he's been an IMDb member for seven months (at least under the username unator) and that the five reviews he has posted in that time are negative, always based on his denigrating and contemptuous opinion of women.

In his review of the series Hijack, he writes of the protagonists:

Needless to say, they are both 'powerful' women. (Follow the formula — 'strong women' or no series!) And the audiences continue to swallow this rubbish.

His review of the series The Diplomat, in which a female career diplomat lands in a high-profile job, is similarly dismissive of women:

The role of the protagonist mirrors Wonder Woman. The smartest, toughest, you name it and this girl can do it! As a spoof it would be entertaining. As a serious take it is laughable.

The 2017 coming-of-age French film Ava has several nude scenes, portraying as it does the sexual awakening of a rebellious teenage girl. Here is unator's take on this:

The male nudity especially appears to have been included by the (female) writer and director to titillate. What is it with female writers and directors and their desire to exhibit full frontal nude males? If I took a guess I would have to say they are trying to emasculate under the guise of 'edgy'. It is simply a sad reflection on their own psychological hang-ups.

The user also pans Minx, in part for being "more of the 'women as victims of the evil patriarchy'," although he does admit this would be "bearable" if only the series were well done. Strangely, the large amount of male frontal nudity doesn't seem to bother him as much here. He dismisses it as "look[ing] like it has been included to draw attention away from how bad the series is." Could this have something to do with the fact that nearly half of the episodes were directed by men, who surely have no desire to "titillate" or, god forbid, "emasculate" anyone? Given that the female protagonist is a feminist, I’m also not surprised the user didn’t like this series.

So, here is my question: Is misogyny and woman-bashing something that IMDb moderators can be counted on to root out of user reviews?