Low resolution screenshot used as primary images need to be deleted

Yes, and poor quality and resolution are on the criteria, and they all pixel up. Especially #210321-192920-766402  Screenshots are not Still frames. There are two Wikipedia articles about one and the other. Still frames made out of screenshots are bound to be pixeled up and of low quality. This is clearly made by someone who paused a YouTube video, not a proper video capture with the proper equipment as per explained in the Wikipedia article. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Film_frame https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Screenshot

Hi, ACT_1. Why are you shoehorning into this thread your rhetorical and possibly-sarcastic questions about film/video frames uploaded as images that cannot automatically crop meaningfully in thumbnail image form? Why won't you simply create a new thread about how frustrated you are about specific IMDb name page thumbnail images? Also, I sincerely doubt that you by now still don't know that there are some unclaimed name pages that have images in their respective galleries, even in the profile picture slot. C'mon! Let's be serious please.

Michelle, I understand the rules of IMDb, and respect your devotion to them. But this a poor depiction of two men. I must say I want a serious conversation, but Act_1 really made me laugh with this one.  Victor Adamson  https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0011535/ Which one is Victor Adamson ?? Now imagine how Mr. Adamson would feel if he was alive and saw that his profile was horse's face...  In my case is a badly paused screenshot to represent the thumbnail. All pixelated, some more than others.  On their profile, both guys who are performing a song have their mouths wide open and look completely ridiculous. One of them is so bad it's like when you pause a video of your friend find his worse facial expression and send it to him as a joke. Anyways I made my point. No biggie. Hope everyone had a nice day.