388 Messages
•
8K Points
Keywords with sexual themes is often declined.
Hello.
This happens often.
Latest example: 2 declined of 30 keywords on:
#260914-134357-262000
This is on title:
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt45846697
Which is called "Wet Hot Boys" , (cheesy soap opera, LOL, not an "adult" movie) , now the title and the poster itself, should be enough to make it likely that the Keywords I added would be in this TV series.
Since I know thees words often gets declined i now also added an "explanation" , still it got declined
So can someone tell me what sort of evidence I should provide?
There is no option to load pictures with the subtitles, and this is a series you need Subscription to see, so a link to the show would not work since i don't think IMDb have access to the hundreds of subscriptions that exists.
Also the Micro Drama's are Mobile Phone shows, so there are no regular URLs to put in a browser.
Se my comment for the 2 words declined.





Kristin
388 Messages
•
8K Points
22 days ago
KeywordAddition
queer plot-detailYour Comment
“ Character says he is a queer ” ReasonUnable to verify.Your contribution has been declined.We have been unable to verify your contribution.
Unfortunately, we were unable to accept your submission as we were unable to verify the information provided.
If your submission was placed via the IMDb.com Desktop title or name page submission form, you now have an option to provide evidence with your additions, as well as corrections or deletions. Please go to your Contribution History, re-load the submission reference and tick the box “provide an explanation to assist in processing this submission” and “check these updates”. The field will become available in the submission form. Please include evidence, or provide a URL which contains supporting evidence within this field.
For all other submissions, please see our Help Site for further information or details on how to contact us.
KeywordAddition
reference-to-an-erection plot-detailYour Comment
“ someone putts viagra in a characters water bottle and it has an effect... ” ReasonUnable to verify.Your contribution has been declined.We have been unable to verify your contribution.
Unfortunately, we were unable to accept your submission as we were unable to verify the information provided.
If your submission was placed via the IMDb.com Desktop title or name page submission form, you now have an option to provide evidence with your additions, as well as corrections or deletions. Please go to your Contribution History, re-load the submission reference and tick the box “provide an explanation to assist in processing this submission” and “check these updates”. The field will become available in the submission form. Please include evidence, or provide a URL which contains supporting evidence within this field.
0
0
Kristin
388 Messages
•
8K Points
22 days ago
Same thing/word on :
#260827-214452-380000
0
0
Kristin
388 Messages
•
8K Points
22 days ago
calling-someone-a-bitch
#260814-051648-548000
0
0
Maya
Employee
•
9.3K Messages
•
97.5K Points
22 days ago
Hi Kristin-
Thank you for posting all these references! After further reviewing, we will pass this report along to the respective team for visibility. These have been re-submitted and approved. The changes will be live on the site shortly.
Cheers!
0
bradley_kent
1.8K Messages
•
29.5K Points
22 days ago
This is all part of a bigger issue that needs (but probably won’t get) attention. IMDb apparently uses some kind of morality filter for keyword that not only have to do with sex, but other supposedly “sensitive” subjects, too. (Including “jew,” but not “christian”!)
“masturbation” and “fellatio” are always flagged, only to sometimes be rejected or sometimes be delayed.
“butt” is one of these supposedly sensitive keywords, BUT also flagged is “head-butt.” Curiously, “buttocks” is acceptable.
Unbelievable.
Yes, profanity should be flagged, and there are other words or phrases that can be used instead of profanity, I.e. “c-word” instead of “c--k” or “c--t.” In the past, even the inappropriate “boobs” has been accepted.
Sometimes, I am just submitting a category for an already existing “sensitive” keyword and it gets rejected or delayed.
IMDb has seemingly appointed itself as some kind of moral arbiter. If a title has a rape in it, “rape” is an appropriate and accurate keyword.
Here’s a prime example (a resubmission) where “sensitive” keywords were denied when they are an intricate and extremely important part of the title:
Track Contribution
Keywords - 3 items added
Where has objectivity gone?
Bring back facts instead of editorial opinion.
(edited)
3