112 Messages

 • 

3.4K Points

Tuesday, December 24th, 2024 10:27 PM

In Progress

Keyword Rejection Query

I would be interested to hear from a list manager why 5 of the 20 keywords in update 241221-185553-704000 were rejected. I watched the movie, updated the cast and the bulk of the missing image tags, and submitted the keywords in question, all of which are elements of this TV-MA title. The runtime is also off by a minute but I'll fix that after posting. Now, it could be argued that one of the rejected keywords should be categorized as a "Plot Detail" instead of the category I chose. And one rejected keyword isn't a clinical term. All of the rejected keywords are currently in the database, and none is a Special Keyword. If there's a new policy not to display certain keywords (i.e. risqué), even for titles dealing specifically with sexuality/sexual matters, then so be it, I'll keep that in mind going forward.

Employee

 • 

2.6K Messages

 • 

28.2K Points

3 months ago

Hi carter_hayes- Thank you for providing the submission reference number! After further investigation, we have re-submitted one of the 5 keywords on your behalf and approved it. As per the other 4, we are consulting with our policy team and we'll reply once we have further information. Cheers!

112 Messages

 • 

3.4K Points

Thanks, Maya. Will await further information. In the meantime, have a happy holiday season!

Employee

 • 

2.6K Messages

 • 

28.2K Points

@carter_hayes​ Your welcome!  Happy Holidays as well! 

1.4K Messages

 • 

25K Points

What is the title in question?

112 Messages

 • 

3.4K Points

Sorry, Bradley, I missed your post. The title is John (2023/II).

1.4K Messages

 • 

25K Points

There were problems with Categories. I have submitted corrections. Also, IMDb is vey hesitant about any keywords that have anything to do with sex, and their processing is usually delayed a day or two.

1.4K Messages

 • 

25K Points

“fellatio: is the final keyword that IMDb is hesitant to process!

112 Messages

 • 

3.4K Points

The keyword rejected in 250105-210608-478000 also appears to be on the "hesitant to process" list, even though it's what prompted the British star to write the short film based on a real-life experience in the modelling industry.