Incorrect, deceptive credit of plot authorship

@Michelle

Um, no. Not acceptable.

I wanted to keep this kind of anonymous, but I'll go ahead and say it here: I am the original writer of the item in question. I am the former LazyBastardGuy, now going by the handle ICantTell. I am NOT ahmetkozan, and I have the update ticket number to prove it:

130921-044343-910000

THAT is the original item I submitted. ahmetkozan did spruce it up, which I do appreciate, but now is credited as the sole author of that blurb. It's not that I take such pride in this piece of work that I want recognition for it, it's just that I happened to notice that someone who EDITED it was wrongly credited for having written the whole thing to begin with. This is purely an ethical problem. As further proof of what I myself orginally wrote (and was accepted), I'm including a screencap of the page from my account. It even still has my original name on it.

This is why having more of a wiki structure like Wikipedia itself would be best for IMDb. The site clearly makes it too easy for people to wrongfully take credit for things they did not do. If this is truly a user-generated, collaborative, open effort, it must present itself as such. Every last edit on Wikipedia is credited to someone, somewhere, no matter what it was or whether that person ever edited again. Even vanished users, those who invoke what they call a "right to vanish" and have their accounts scrubbed by admins, still receive credit through a garbage username that no human being would ever use and that replaces the vanished user's original handle in the edit history of whichever page(s) they edited. Viewing edit histories never requires logging in either, even if a page is locked so only an admin can edit it.

As for how IMDb could be fooled into thinking I would have edited a plot summary of my own making under a different username, I'm simply at a loss. This shouldn't even be possible through the software. If it is, that is a serious oversight that IMDb needs to correct. An edit history with all contributors, including timestamps of who did what when, is essential to a collaborative project such as this one. I thought it even had such a feature, as I recall at least being able to list who had edited a particular item, and I do realize that IMDb is overhauling itself, but based on what Michelle just said, this isn't a problem concerning IMDb changing to new software. I admit I did see this incorrect attribution problem a very long time ago, but I did nothing as at the time I did not feel it would accomplish anything. But now I figure it could.