I don't think it's right to reject contributions for no other reason than:

Since the summary was not accepted and everything that is currently being said about the film “Predpolozhim, ty – kapitan” is “The adventures of the Soviet pupils,” I have decided to submit a PLOT SUMMARY ADDITION February 12, 2026 #260212-131602-070000 which is still pending. The goal, with the reviewers' permission, is to help film lovers really understand what the movie is about.

@Pmoran- Thank you! I have taken a look at it and please note that the first comments on the summary are not valid. Regarding your submission issue explanation, this does not belong there which is why it has been declined as such. 

You will have to re-submit it according to our guidelines. 

If you need to put a further explanation or supporting evidence on your contribution, you can do so by providing this information on the 'Provide an explanation to assist in processing this submission' box instead. 

Indeed, the first lines were a critique of the reviewer who rejected my contribution without any reason. What is important here is the quality of the information provided; to which those of us who contribute altruistically add our best intentions. I have sent another contribution, removing the first lines. I hope there are no problems this time. February 12, 2026 #260212-183124-129000

But what seems clear is that reasons should be given explicitly and very clearly to reject contributions, out of simple respect for the person making the contribution.

@Pmoran- I can see that this was already approved.