2.7K Messages
•
47K Points
How to Know If Your New Keyword Might be a Bad Keyword
How do you know if your newly created keyword might be a bad keyword?
Well, one red flag is if your keyword does not yet apply to any other titles, and you either can't think of any other titles to apply it to, or you don't even take the time to try to think about that. A second red flag is if your keyword is super long and/or describes more than one thing in a single keyword. And a dead giveaway is if your keyword is, truth be told, just an unnecessary spinoff of a much more popular and perfectly suitable existing keyword. Under these conditions, your keyword is probably a bad keyword.
Case in point. First, consider the popular keyword that would probably work for most, if not all, of these titles:
damsel-in-distress (5170 titles)
Now consider the newly created bad keywords:
damsel-in-distress-more-than-four-times (1 title) | |
damsel-in-distress-multiple-times (1 title) |
baby-damsel-in-distress (2 titles) | |
fake-damsel-in-distress (1 title) | |
old-damsel-in-distress (1 title) | |
nude-damsel-in-distress (1 title) | |
dog-damsel-in-distress (1 title) | |
irate-damsel-in-distress (1 title) | |
damsel-in-disdress (1 title) | |
mansel-in-distress (1 title) | |
distressed-damsel (13 titles) | |
more-than-one-damsel-in-distress (2 titles) |
tough-little-damsel-in-distress (1 title) | |
devious-damsel-in-distress (1 title) |
distressed-damsel's-uncle-in-distress (1 title) | |
distressed-damsel-is-a-man (1 title) |
depressed-distressed-damsel (3 titles) | |
highly-distressd-damsel (2 titles) | |
baby-distressed-damsel (1 title) | |
two-distressed-damsels (1 title) | |
distressed-damsel-rescused (1 title) | |
distressed-damsel-undressed (1 title) | |
damsel-in-dire-straits (1 title) | |
distressed-damsel-in-tight-shirt (1 title) | |
distressed-damsel-in-tight-pants (1 title) | |
distressed-damsel-gets-more-distressed (2 titles) |
These are the sorts of keywords that I spend a lot of time cleaning up through manual editing. Unlike our resident keyword-fighting warrior @bradley_kent, I do not have the mental stamina or sufficient free time to churn through thousands of keyword edits in a single sitting. But I do end up spending a fair amount of time cleaning up smaller keyword messes like this.
I just thought I'd share this particular one, because the problem is laugh-out-loud obvious. Whomever is adding these keywords does not seem to understand the purpose of IMDb keywords!
Accepted Solution
Michelle
Employee
•
17.5K Messages
•
313.3K Points
3 years ago
Hi keyword_expert & bradley_kent -
Thanks for the report and comments regarding these identified keywords. I will start going through the list to clean-up any remaining keywords from the above list, I have also identified the contributor and will send a direct outreach regarding our current Keyword criteria.
1
keyword_expert
2.7K Messages
•
47K Points
3 years ago
BTW, the same person also came up with these master-level keywords. (I am being sarcastic here.)
Keywords
Huh?
(edited)
0
bradley_kent
1.3K Messages
•
23.4K Points
3 years ago
I am really trying to curtail my contributions to IMDb, but I feel that I must respond to this posting. The keywords in question (which, I agree, are bad keywords) are apparently the work on a longtime, early and valued contributor who is ONE of the world's, if not THE world's, expert on American films of the teens, 20s, 30s, 40s, 50s, 60s and early 70s, specially grindhouse and "b" movies. Out of respect and courtesy, the IMDb staff should contact this contributor about these and other questionable keywords. (If you would like, e-mail me, and I can help you identify this contributor with other specific and unique keywords that are a part of his contributions.)
I would also like to know If
keyword_expert
is a staff member, or has this person just appointed himself/herself as THE keyword expert. This person is making a lot of definitive statements and directives that, I feel, are best left to the staff.
(edited)
1
bradley_kent
1.3K Messages
•
23.4K Points
3 years ago
Just to note. "damsel-in-distress" was acknowledged as a valid keyword in the past, although I have always preferred then more modern and less prosaic "woman-in-jeopardy." I can see where "damsel-in-distress" can be quite useful for fairy tales, and certain action, adventure, sci-fi, western, serials, etc. titles, especially older ones.
(edited)
0
bradley_kent
1.3K Messages
•
23.4K Points
3 years ago
P.S. You should also communicate with this valued contributor about his keywords that begin with "more-than-" and "no-." I have visions of him painstakingly counting for the "more-than-" keywords, and the "no-" keywords seem absolutely unnecessary (except for keywords like "no-opening-credits)." The "more-than-" keywords seem like a way to "get around" the guidelines for keywords to usually be singular rather than plural. (There's another contributor who likes to use "multiple-" and "-many-times," who should also be notified.)
These unnecessary keywords could lead to absurd situations like: for Ben-Hur, "no-spaceships," and, instead of "army," using "more-than-one-soldier," "more-than-twenty-soldiers," "more-than-three-hundred-soldiers," "more-than-four-thousand-soldiers,"etc.
And, of course, his subjective judgements as to what is "normal" or "abnormal."
(edited)
1
0
ACT_1
8.5K Messages
•
176.2K Points
3 years ago
Add this here ??
Law & Order (1990–2010)
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0098844/keywords
Plot Keywords ??
https://www.imdb.com/search/keyword/?keywords=ampersand-in-title : 913 titles
https://www.imdb.com/search/keyword/?keywords=ampersand-in-series-title : 48 titles
https://www.imdb.com/search/keyword/?keywords=punctuation-in-title : 5,410 titles
https://www.imdb.com/search/keyword/?keywords=punctuation-in-series-title : 90 titles
https://www.imdb.com/search/keyword/?keywords=famous-opening-theme : 263 titles
.
0
0