plur62's profile

340 Messages

 • 

6.8K Points

Thursday, February 19th, 2026

In Progress

Feature Request: Smart "Report for Deletion" button for low-data/ghost titles

Hi,

​I want to propose a more efficient way for the community to help clean up the database, specifically targeting "ghost" or "phantom" titles that lack any verifiable information.

​■ The Problem:

Currently, when we find a page that is clearly a mistake (e.g., a title named just "." or a random string of characters with no cast, crew, or release date), the "Title Deletion" option is often missing from the "Edit Page" menu. This leaves contributors in a dead-end with no way to flag the page for removal.

​■ The Solution:

I am proposing a "Smart Reporting" system.

I am NOT suggesting this for established films like Psycho or Citizen Kane. Instead, this feature should be triggered only for:

● Low-data pages: Titles with no credited cast, crew, or production companies.

​● Placeholder titles: Titles consisting of symbols, dots, or "TBA".

​● Abandoned test pages: Pages that have existed for months/years without a single update.

​How it would work:

If a title meets certain "low-integrity" criteria (lack of metadata), a "Report as Non-Existent/Junk" button should appear. This would allow users to quickly alert staff to a page that shouldn't be in the database, without having to navigate the complex (and often missing) "Edit Page" deletion workflow.

Thanks

Oldest First
Selected Oldest First

Employee

 • 

8.4K Messages

 • 

194.1K Points

3 months ago

@plur62 Thanks for the suggestion, however, this is already how the existing title deletion option is supposed to work.  It is not available on all titles to protect established titles  (as you note) but it should be available on the types of titles to which you are referring here.  A better approach would be for you to post a list of titles which lack the delete option and we can look at adjusting the criteria in the current system vs. building a duplicate system.  We would need around 5-10 example titles which need to be deleted in order to build an understanding of where the current system is failing.  

Aside from the above though, is the system for titles which do not have a delete option in the contribution interface really that difficult?  As you can see in https://help.imdb.com/article/contribution/titles/title-corrections/G7J57QHX9CAN989N?ref_=helpsrall#deleting all you need to do is follow the specific link which takes you directly to the appropriate contact form at https://help.imdb.com/contact?deepLink=delete_title&disableLoginPopup=true and provide the required information (which needs to be provided via the other route anyway).  The only real difference is that in the contact from you have to include a link to the title page which you are trying to delete. 

Hope this helps. 

3.4K Messages

 • 

94.3K Points

@Col_Needham​ Using the list of the keywords video-collection (https://www.imdb.com/search/title/?keywords=video-collection) and cartoon-collection (https://www.imdb.com/search/title/?keywords=cartoon-collection) I found the following titles that have very little data on them and yet no title deletion function while I think they should all be deleted on account of them being compilations and not featuring (any) new material:

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt37533238/reference/

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt37388100/reference/

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt37393651/reference/

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt37393165/reference/

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt37393134/reference/

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt37413489/reference/

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt37543437/reference/

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt37319720/reference/

By the way, judging from the tt number, it seems they have been roughly in the same time period. Perhaps by the same contributor? It might be wise to check what this person has added beyond the titles listed here.

(can someone remove the Solved tag please?)

(edited)

Employee

 • 

7.6K Messages

 • 

79.9K Points

@Marco​ - You can submit the title deletion requests via the Contact form as linked by Col above, if these titles don't have a 'Title Deletion' request on the contribution form.

Once submitted through the Contact form, these will be reviewed respectively.

(edited)

3.4K Messages

 • 

94.3K Points

@Maya​ Thanks for your response, but that's not why I posted this. In his post, Col said that if a list of 5-10 titles that don't have a 'Title Deletion' option are shared, you guys might be able to update the current system a bit. 

Also, I said that maybe all these titles were added by the same contributor and it might be worth to check out if this person added more information incorrectly. 

(can someone remove the Solved tag please?)

3.4K Messages

 • 

94.3K Points

Is it too soon for a bump?

340 Messages

 • 

6.8K Points

@Col_Needham

The core issue here is the logical impossibility of "proving a negative." While IMDb makes it incredibly easy to add data, it makes it nearly impossible to remove titles that shouldn't be there in the first place.

​If I want to add a credit, I can provide a screenshot or a link. But how do I "prove" that a 30-year-old project like Red Angels (1994) doesn't exist? My only "proof" is that it is absent from national film archives, festival catalogs, and trade publications.

​There are likely thousands of these "ghost entries"—abandoned scripts or working titles from the early digital era—cluttering the database.

Requiring a manual email or a help desk ticket for every single one is an inefficient hurdle that discourages contributors from cleaning up the site.

​We need a streamlined way to flag "Low-Data/Ghost Titles" directly on the Edit page. If a title has had zero updates, no cast, and no verifiable distribution for over a decade, the burden of proof should shift back to those claiming it exists, not to those of us trying to maintain a clean and accurate database.

EDIT:

To illustrate the absurdity of the current system: I frequently encounter entries where there is zero evidence of the film's existence in any form. For titles like "Red Angels (1994)", I have submitted requests to change the Title Type to "Video"—essentially using it as a "trash bin" for these unverified titles—and these requests are consistently accepted within 24 hours.

​This proves the paradox: IMDb's system will readily accept "corrections" to the metadata of a ghost entry, yet it provides no direct mechanism to report that the entry itself is a fiction.

​It is far easier to pivot a ghost title into a different category than it is to prove its non-existence. This "edit-but-never-delete" policy leads to a database filled with correctly categorized but completely imaginary projects. We need a way to flag these titles for verification without having to resort to individual emails for every single ghost in the system.

(edited)