Credit list order correction accepted: but it doesn't work!

My submission: #250618-182442-179000 Walden (2023) 43 items Actress, Actor Approved (42) Declined (1) Actress Edit Before Raymonde, Tania Detective Sally Hunt 4 After Raymonde, Tania Detective Sally Hunt 6 Your Comment “ Correct credits order ” Reason Unable to verify. Your contribution has been declined.We have been unable to verify your contribution. Unfortunately, we were unable to accept your submission as we were unable to verify the information provided. If your submission was placed via the IMDb.com Desktop title or name page submission form, you now have an option to provide evidence with your additions, as well as corrections or deletions. Please go to your Contribution History, re-load the submission reference and tick the box “provide an explanation to assist in processing this submission” and “check these updates”. The field will become available in the submission form. Please include evidence, or provide a URL which contains supporting evidence within this field. All well and good, you say: 42 accepted, 1 rejected. Except: 1. I didn't provide any evidence for the 42 correct answers either. 2. The cast order on the site now contains multiple repetitions of cast list numbers; specifically, two actors at #4, two at #11 and two at #35. The upshot is: IMDb did not accept all 42 of my cast number corrections, as they said. If they had accepted them, the list would run smoothly from #1 to #43. (The actual numbers were copied laboriously from the DVD end credits. They are genuine.) The fix is simple: one of the #4 actors should go to #6 (which is missing as the cast now stands), one of the 11s should go to #15 (blank) and one of the 37s should go to #35 (also blank). Furthermore, the actor at position #18 (Sean Freeland) is not in the end credits at all. This is because he only appears in 2 deleted scenes. This would shift all the subsequent cast numbers up by one. Never mind, just follow my numbering and you will have an accurate list. The point is: I already did all the work. Isn't that what a wiki-site is good for? You can't be checking and overchecking, to the detriment of accuracy, when your contributors are willing to do the work ... isn't that so? Frankly, I was more than half-expecting a blanket refusal, since you only had my word for all those corrections. I have been burned in this way before. But instead, you half-accepted them, and messed up the whole shebang. Please correct and rearrange. I've already spent much time on this. hutch48