"Bug" report: DIRTRADE sintax not detected after a SPOILER tag

Hi, everyone!

I was adding some timestamps to the trivia and goof items of Christian Alvart's Case 39 (2009) when I noticed that there is an entry in which both the SPOILER and DIRTRADE tags are combined.

The item is apparently well-formatted and, since the spoiler tag appears at the beginning, it is properly detected as such and added to the bottom of the page. However, the dirtrade tag is ignored. Probably, if I reversed the order of the tags the result would be that the entry would be deemed as a director trademark, but not as a spoiler, because I suspect that the tags cameo, dircameo, dirtrade and spoiler are mutually exclusive and only the one that appears at the beginning of the entry applies. I also suspect that this behavior is intentional, hence the quotation marks in "bug", and in the end I'll remove the spoiler tag for this particular instance, because it is not really necessary, so no problemo.

Nevertheless, I thought it appropriate to explain here how the system works to suggest a minor change. Since IMDb, naturally, seems to prioritize the spoiler tag over the others (in fact, there is a yellow warning implemented to indicate that this tag should appear at the beginning of the entry, something that does not exist for the other three tags)...

Thank you.

P.S. While searching GetSatisfaction to see if any thread had previously made reference to this issue, I stumbled upon my old post about director trademarks. OMG! 6 years have passed already... we're getting old....