Big Data -vs- Individual Rights
IMDb is intentionally engaging in deceptive practices with strong negative implications. IMDb poses as a database however, there are regulatory databases that undergo factual analysis in compliance with legal protections and the law to protect individuals from companies like IMDb that are not seeking to perform services for the good of the public. IMDb is a private company engaging in its actions for profit. IMDb has an unfair advantage and a monopoly in the industry.
IMDb is no more than a “social” engagement and networking site for individuals within an industry, much like LinkedIn is. By biding people in perpetuity to being featured on its site IMDb is violating individual rights and challenging while threatening the fundamental protections guaranteed to individuals under the first amendment.
See the below links to the voices of people who just want to be removed from this social site that wishes to be a database. There are people who have incorrect credits listed that want them removed. There are people who have moved on with their lives and want to be disassociated with the industry. Again, IMDb is not a regulatory agency. It is private company, deceptively holding people’s image, name, and identifying aspects within its private database for its own gain - to build its company, its website, its monopoly, and its own personal database.
When individuals express that they do not agree to the terms of the use of service that IMDb requires of its users and do not wish to be featured on IMDb they should be able to have themselves removed from this social platform regardless of what projects they have actually or factually been featured in or not.
IMDb is a for profit company which, from public information, generates revenue from paid memberships and advertisements. It does not engage is public services for public good.
1 year ago
At the end of the day, IMDb is an historical database and definitely for ”public good”. Sure, it serves as a resume/CV for many, but every name page becomes part of the history at some point.
1 year ago
No one, including IMDb, has a "monopoly" on public information. Perhaps, you should spend some time researching the terms you misuse before posting a rant? If you were part of the industry at some point, why should history forget that?