angelo_pilla's profile

153 Messages

 • 

7.5K Points

Wed, Oct 31, 2018 1:00 PM

IMDb new advanced title search

Now the results on IMDb advanced title search appear with bizarre descriptions, like "Released between 1950-01-01 and 1959-12-31 User Rating at least 7 Rating Count at least 5,000 Not Classics.". Why change something that was ok? At least now when we look for films in IMDb rating order, the movies with the same rating number are not appearing in popularity order anymore. They are appearing in US RELEASE ORDER. Why can't we simply have an accurate IMDb rating order search result anymore? Why? Why?

Responses

Employee

 • 

4.4K Messages

 • 

144.5K Points

3 y ago

This is the new search technology which replaces the old system and fixes many bugs in the old one, including the removal of the limit on 10,000 results, and it also adds support for the "!" operator to remove more result sets (for now by hand editing the URLs).   This is intended as a drop-in replacement for the old system.  If you are experiencing problems with the new system, please let us know:

1. The URL of the problem search result 
2. The location of the link to this result on IMDb.com (or whether it is a bookmarked search). 

Note it is not always easy to generate the perfect English description for every combination of parameters, but if you provide specific examples, we can take a look at fine-tuning the wording. 

For example, although you have always been able to do: https://www.imdb.com/search/title?title_type=feature&release_date=2018-01-01,&languages=en you can now do the opposite query: https://www.imdb.com/search/title?title_type=feature&release_date=2018-01-01,&!languages=en

8.1K Messages

 • 

184.5K Points

Nice.

Champion

 • 

9.3K Messages

 • 

274.8K Points

Perhaps the search parameters in the descriptions could be separated with commas.

8.1K Messages

 • 

184.5K Points

Meaning?

Champion

 • 

9.3K Messages

 • 

274.8K Points

"Released between 1950-01-01 and 1959-12-31, User Rating at least 7, Rating Count at least 5,000, Not Classics"

instead of

"Released between 1950-01-01 and 1959-12-31 User Rating at least 7 Rating Count at least 5,000 Not Classics"

8.1K Messages

 • 

184.5K Points

3 y ago

Hi, Angelo Pilla. Could you clarify the problems with the ordering, by presenting an example?

153 Messages

 • 

7.5K Points

3 y ago

Now it turns back to normal again, thanks. 

153 Messages

 • 

7.5K Points

3 y ago

And now it's bizarre again. Why IMDb keep changing things for worse, always?

8.1K Messages

 • 

184.5K Points

The setbacks are intended to be temporary, since parts of the site are being renovated from the ground up, in the migration from the old platform to the new. For one reason or another, the new software could not be made before the old software was taken offline.

82 Messages

 • 

3K Points

3 y ago

Please STOP this experiment, everything was fine week ago. Advanced title search is pretty useless now.

Employee

 • 

4.4K Messages

 • 

144.5K Points

The new search is designed to be a plug-in replacement for the old one, except with the known bugs and limitations fixed.  If there are specific queries which are now useless, please post links to the search results and we will take a look. 

82 Messages

 • 

3K Points

Yes. Sorting titles by year, user rating, alphabet, running time ... is not possible when we pass the first 50 results, it always returns us to the first page. Hope this will be fixed soon.

Thanks for answer.

Employee

 • 

4.4K Messages

 • 

144.5K Points

Please provide a few URLs of broken searches. 

We cannot reproduce this, sorry.  For example, here are 1940s movies with > 10K votes, sorted by year -> https://www.imdb.com/search/title?title_type=feature&release_date=1940-01-01,1949-12-31&num_... and clicking "Next" takes you to https://www.imdb.com/search/title?title_type=feature&release_date=1940-01-01,1949-12-31&num_... as expected. 

82 Messages

 • 

3K Points

Example: Feature Film (Sorted by Popularity Ascending) 5,001. - 5,050. results https://www.imdb.com/search/title?title_type=feature&start=5001&ref_=adv_nxt and clicking "Runtime" (or Year, A-Z, whatever), we are back on the first 50 results, not (5,001. - 5,050.) https://www.imdb.com/search/title?title_type=feature&sort=runtime,asc
 
?

Employee

 • 

4.4K Messages

 • 

144.5K Points

I see, so your point there is: on https://www.imdb.com/search/title?title_type=feature&start=5001&ref_=adv_nxt when you click "A-Z" in the header, you are now taken to https://www.imdb.com/search/title?title_type=feature&sort=alpha,asc whereas you are expecting it to go to https://www.imdb.com/search/title?title_type=feature&sort=alpha,asc&start=5001 instead? 

I think we could argue this both ways.  By clicking the option in the header, the customer is changing the sort so it's actually better to return to the first page as we have implemented today. Are we missing a use case here for your suggestion of retaining the pagination point in the new sort?

82 Messages

 • 

3K Points

By returning to the first page, we must click "Next" for 100 times to go on 5001 results, because clicking on URL numbers also does not work anymore.