40 Messages
•
1.4K Points
Poll Suggestion: Unnecessary Sequels
Sometimes sequels aren't necessary but get made any ways, whether you like it or not. Just one movie or a few can tell a story perfectly until someone decides to continue it. These are movies you may wish never existed. You may wonder why (other than a simple nostalgic cash grab) they were even considered to begin with. Which sequel was the most unnecessary (and thus negating any subsequent sequels)?
https://www.imdb.com/list/ls092090364/
https://www.imdb.com/list/ls092090364/
MyCatDuffyTookMyLaptop
4.4K Messages
•
124K Points
5 years ago
To me, Dark Fate was an unnecessary sequel. Although it wasn't as bad as I fearrd, it was wasn't too wonderful, either. Terminator: Genysis wrapped everything nicely; we didn't need to come back in with more future drama. :D
0
MykolaYeriomin
Champion
•
4K Messages
•
244.1K Points
5 years ago
Highlander II: The Quickening (1991) (although I love this movie, it's hard to deny that original was supposed to be standalone and whole existence of this is an anomaly. Although I'm also glad it started a franchise.)
My vote would likely go to Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines (2003). The more I encounter it with age, the less appeal it has to me and it might be one of the most soulless cashgrabs of a sequel I've ever seen. Each of the following sequels, no matter how panned, clearly at least tries something and takes risks. This one was a studio product to such a blatant extent, it hurts.
1
0
m_curry
40 Messages
•
1.4K Points
5 years ago
0