george_loomis's profile

110 Messages

 • 

2.8K Points

Tue, Nov 27, 2018 7:14 PM

Receipt #181119-182028-719000.

Hello IMDb!

As mentioned, I'm not in Lifetime's "The Bling Ring" title. I am not in it in any capacity. Their producer, Philip Harrelson, is confirming this to you all with an update. He is a producer of the title. I appreciate commitment to accuracy, and this update has been mishandled. Many people have their IMDb handled by management, at certain times, and mistakes happen. Let's kindly resolve this for good.

Please look out for Philip Harrelson's update. Mine is #181119-182028-719000. I'm looking forward to clearing this up so your site is more accurate, as you say is IMDb's main objective. Thank you!!!

GL

Responses

Champion

 • 

829 Messages

 • 

46.2K Points

3 y ago

Hi, George:

I'm going to be sincere. This is what sounds strange to me (and perhaps to as well and that may be the reason why they're reluctant to accept your corrections). There are titles listed in your page for over 8 years and we've never heard any complaints about them...


...but now that those entries are marked as (uncredited), presumably because your name doesn't appear in the on-screen credits, suddenly you claim that you have absolutely nothing to do with those titles; not only that you weren't billed on screen, but that you weren't in them in any capacity...

No offence, but the conclusion is that either you've been falsely enriching your resumé for a long time, or that you're intentionally trying to clean it up of valid (uncredited) entries (on the false belief that they're just extra roles).

What would happen if some staffer/contributor watched The Bling Ring (as you challenged) and spotted you there? You risk losing your reliability for future updates...

Champion

 • 

829 Messages

 • 

46.2K Points

3 y ago

George, just a brief recap (including the other thread)...
I have nothing to do with this title [...]
This is the second time you all are fighting me on something in a week.
It’s unprofessional. [...] Now you’re insisting that I’m in a film that I’m not in.
Do you want to watch the film and get back to me? These responses are unacceptable. I’m not going to back down or understand why you’re flaunting passion for accuracy
[...] I will keep submitting proof that I’m not in this movie
[...] I was not in that Lifetime film years ago. That's not up for debate
if someone were to watch The Bling Ring looking for me, I would love that! I'm not in it.
I've been able to watch The Bling Ring... actually, only the first 14 minutes... Now that I know the truth, what do you think I should say?

Sometimes skepticism is not a bad thing...

5 Messages

 • 

246 Points

3 y ago

Escribe una respuesta